Yay now I can finally add those other 3 R9 290x Lightning's to my rig.
Interesting product, but also not really a new concept.
I mean heck its already semi-common to use one PSU on its own to run multiple GPUs if you have 2 small PSUs and don't or can't afford a big one.
Is this a better implementation? Absolutely.
[QUOTE=S31-Syntax;50126478]Interesting product, but also not really a new concept.
I mean heck its already semi-common to use one PSU on its own to run multiple GPUs if you have 2 small PSUs and don't or can't afford a big one.
Is this a better implementation? Absolutely.[/QUOTE]
Yeah you won't have to manually jumpstart the GPU one and hope you get the timing right :v:
with the right tower you LITERALLY could run two PC's in the same tower
lmao fucking amazing
[editline]13th April 2016[/editline]
I hope that cross PC HDD's are a thing
this way both PC's use the same HDD for something
Honestly having two computers in one case would be ideal for me. I could run my home computer and server in one.
[QUOTE=J!NX;50126488]with the right tower you LITERALLY could run two PC's in the same tower
lmao fucking amazing
[editline]13th April 2016[/editline]
I hope that cross PC HDD's are a thing
this way both PC's use the same HDD for something[/QUOTE]
iSCSI is damn near naturally sharing a hard drive or set of drives from one machine to another. the endpoint needs to be cluster aware to not fuck everything up when 2 machines access it at the same time though
[QUOTE=ArcticRevrus;50127047]iSCSI is damn near naturally sharing a hard drive or set of drives from one machine to another. the endpoint needs to be cluster aware to not fuck everything up when 2 machines access it at the same time though[/QUOTE]
An SSD SANS on a 10gb network would be beautiful.
[QUOTE=Merijnwitje;50126554]Honestly having two computers in one case would be ideal for me. I could run my home computer and server in one.[/QUOTE]
if only you could use one mouse on both as well but that's way not possible from a software side
thankfully small keyboards and wireless mice exist
[QUOTE=J!NX;50128352]if only you could use one mouse on both as well but that's way not possible from a software side
thankfully small keyboards and wireless mice exist[/QUOTE]
[url]http://synergy-project.org/[/url]
[QUOTE=Levelog;50128405][url]http://synergy-project.org/[/url][/QUOTE]
and it isn't even doing it through remote control
man that's cool as fuck
[editline]13th April 2016[/editline]
you could literally have one computer for gaming + recording and then render it on your 2 computer AS you record more gameplay
[QUOTE=J!NX;50126488]with the right tower you LITERALLY could run two PC's in the same tower
lmao fucking amazing
[editline]13th April 2016[/editline]
I hope that cross PC HDD's are a thing
this way both PC's use the same HDD for something[/QUOTE]
Linus Tech Tips once ran 7 gaming virtual machines on a single CPU through the magic of virtual machines, and each one could max Crysis 3 at >60FPS at 3340x1440.
[media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LXOaCkbt4lI[/media]
They had to settle for R9 Nanos because it was the best card at a low power draw, and no single PSU could supply power to 7 larger GPUs.
I wonder what they could've done if they had access to this.
[QUOTE=SGTNAPALM;50128582]Linus Tech Tips once ran 7 gaming virtual machines on a [B]single CPU[/B] through the magic of virtual machines[/QUOTE]
I don't understand why they claimed to use a single CPU.
[QUOTE=J!NX;50128414]and it isn't even doing it through remote control
man that's cool as fuck
[editline]13th April 2016[/editline]
you could literally have one computer for gaming + recording and then render it on your 2 computer AS you record more gameplay[/QUOTE]
Its really smooth too. I've used it across a windows, Linux, and OSX machine at once on a complex and busy network and it was butter.
[QUOTE=Levelog;50127066]An SSD SANS on a 10gb network would be beautiful.[/QUOTE]
Most software based network storage solutions support some sort of SSD caching, which basically gives you ssd performance for almost all writes, and ssd performance for any parts of the array that are accessed often.
And 10 gig is still expensive, but its starting to get cost effective enough that it isnt too far out of the realm of feasibility for enthusiasts :v:
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.