Voters make North Dakota first state in nation to protect right to farm in constitution - Polidicks

[quote][B]BISMARCK, N.D.[/B] — Voters in heavily agriculture-dependent North Dakota became the first to enshrine the right to farm in their state constitution, a move that some say could have far-reaching effects on genetic modification, land use and the way animals are raised.The amendment approved Tuesday guarantees the right of farmers to engage in “modern” agriculture and bars any law limiting their right “to employ agricultural technology, modern livestock production and ranching practices.” Supporters said it was broadly worded to protect farmers far into the future. But critics complained it was too vague, and officials in North Dakota said this week that they aren’t sure what the new right really means, how long it will take to define it or whether it would survive a court challenge. Another big question is whether other states will follow. “There’s certainly a lot of interest in the states in protecting agriculture and agricultural practices,” said Scott Hendrick, a program director with the National Conference of State Legislatures. “This takes a broader tack. I think some states will look at this.” The North Dakota Farm Bureau collected signatures to get the amendment on the ballot after the Humane Society of the United States unsuccessfully pushed a measure two years ago to abolish fenced hunting preserves in North Dakota. Farm groups in other states also had become concerned about the Humane Society and other animal welfare organizations pushing laws to ban small crates for chickens and pregnant pigs, and what they saw as a heavier hand with federal regulation under President Barack Obama. Farmers pushed back with social media campaigns designed to sway public opinion and their own initiatives, such as a law passed earlier this year in Iowa that makes it a crime to lie on a job application to get access to a farm to record video of animal abuse. North Dakota’s constitutional amendment takes farm protection a step further. “It’s going to give us a big leg up on special interest groups that come in from outside and want to tell us what to do and what not to do,” said Doyle Johannes, president of the state Farm Bureau. “They’re not going to stop. That was the big thing, to beat these people back. We don’t need outsiders coming here and telling us how to do things.” The amendment passed with two-thirds of the vote Tuesday, the same day voters in California rejected a measure calling for labeling on food products containing genetically modified ingredients. Farm groups also saw that proposal as an attack on agriculture because some of the nation’s most important crops, such as corn, are mainly grown with genetically engineered seeds. Opponents spent $46 million on advertising to defeat the California ballot initiative. In contrast, the North Dakota Farm Bureau spent only about $150,000 to promote its amendment, which drew little attention from out of state. Johannes said it’s getting more notice now. He was at a Farm Bureau meeting in Iowa on Wednesday, and the North Dakota measure was one of the topics of discussion. He also plans to talk about it at a national meeting in Washington next month.[/quote] [url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/voters-make-north-dakota-first-state-in-nation-to-protect-right-to-farm-in-constitution/2012/11/08/3c5183ca-29d5-11e2-aaa5-ac786110c486_story.html] Washington Post[/url]

At least it will get people past all that anti-GM bullshit

Text from the amendment: [quote]The right of farmers and ranchers to engage in modern farming and ranching practices shall be forever guaranteed in this state. No law shall be enacted which abridges the right of farmers and ranchers to employ agricultural technology, modern livestock production and ranching practices.[/quote]

Monsanto is going to be [I]pissed[/I]. For those of you that don't know, if a farmer purchases Monsanto seeds, then re-plants them next year, Monsanto [I]sues the fuck[/I] out of the farmer, or coerces them into a out-of-court agreement. [url]http://www.monsanto.com/newsviews/Pages/saved-seed-farmer-lawsuits.aspx[/url] [quote]Since 1997, we have only filed suit against farmers 145 times in the United States. This may sound like a lot, but when you consider that we sell seed to more than 250,000 American farmers a year, it’s really a small number. Of these, we’ve proceeded through trial with only eleven farmers. All eleven cases were found in Monsanto’s favor.[/quote]

Well Monsato can take a sharpened pencil up the pisser for all I care. Why not have a long-term license required for re-use of the seeds? Not socialistically ideal, but still better than farmers being sued for reusing seeds.

[QUOTE=Saber15;38382053]Monsanto is going to be [I]pissed[/I]. For those of you that don't know, if a farmer purchases Monsanto seeds, then re-plants them next year, Monsanto [I]sues the fuck[/I] out of the farmer, or coerces them into a out-of-court agreement. [url]http://www.monsanto.com/newsviews/Pages/saved-seed-farmer-lawsuits.aspx[/url][/QUOTE] erm this won't do a thing - in order to buy seeds from monsanto you have to sign a contract in which you explicitly agree not to save seeds. they're suing them for a breach of contract which is a perfectly legitimate thing to do. the first amendment protects free speech but you can still be sued for say, breaching a non-disclosure agreement. [editline]9th November 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=ironman17;38382106]Well Monsato can take a sharpened pencil up the pisser for all I care. Why not have a long-term license required for re-use of the seeds? Not socialistically ideal, but still better than farmers being sued for reusing seeds.[/QUOTE] you can't reuse GM seeds in the long term, they don't produce true copies and their yield is reduced. this isn't anything new by the way, it's been the case with hybrid plants since the 1920s.

Hahaha,when the big shit corps(i am looking at you Monsanto) get pissed,they will start calling North Dakota the american North Korea

Oh right, that's why.

[QUOTE=IPK;38382215]Hahaha,when the big shit corps(i am looking at you Monsanto) get pissed,they will start calling North Dakota the american North Korea[/QUOTE] funny because most people that even know of monsanto are as brainwashed about their activities as the citizens of north korea they're not an especially evil corporation