Do you think there should have been another Eragon film?
14 replies, posted
Does anyone on here actually think they should have carried on the Eragon cycle films and made all 4 four films? I wouldn't be too sure if they'd be any good but reading all the books it would have been cool to see how they adapted it. It was a shame that the first one had to get bad ratings so the series didn't carry on, do you think the next films would even work with each book getting longer and longer would the films would just drag on? Personally I would have liked to see them but thats not happening anytime soon haha.
not really because the entire concept and property that is "eragon" is in my opinion, fuck terrible.
in a really pathetic way.
No, the books were mediocre at best and the movie was awful.
The movie was horrible compared to the books (while I liked them they felt rather daft).
If anything they should just reboot it, but I doubt that's going to happen.
no
Only if they don't take a book, stick their dick in it and rape it until it cries like they did the first one.
Only if they cast Sean Connery as Safira and Jeremy Irons as Eragon.
the book was bad, and so was the movie.
They managed to kill off characters that are used in later films - no.
[QUOTE=nicatronTg;35283834]They managed to kill off characters that are used in later films - no.[/QUOTE]
I always do that when i make films. Gives me a pretence to rape the franchise.
[QUOTE=Bomimo;35284069]I always do that when i make films. Gives me a pretence to rape the franchise.[/QUOTE]
I'd love it if Peter Jackson did that with the Hobbit films.
"And then a Mountain Troll smashed Bilbo Baggins with a tree."
No way Jose. There's just no way to make them without removing a bunch of stuff from the story or making a movie that just goes on and on and on....
no they're horrible.
No way man.
Eragon was probably the most generic and forgettable fantasy film I've ever seen.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
