Travelers who match a 'certain description' will be required for extra screening - Polidicks

[url]http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100402/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_aviation_security[/url] [quote=Yahoo! News] WASHINGTON – Travelers from 14 countries that have been home to terrorists will no longer automatically face extra screening before they fly to the U.S. Beginning this month, anyone traveling to the U.S. will instead be screened based on specific information about potential terrorist threats, a senior Obama administration official said. A person would be stopped if he or she matches a description, even if officials do not have a suspect's name, according to the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive security issues. [B]For example, if the U.S. has intelligence about a Nigerian man between the ages of 22 and 32 whom officials believe is a threat or a known terrorist, under the new policy all Nigerian men within that age range will receive extra screening before they are allowed to fly to the U.S. If intelligence later shows that the suspect is not a terrorist, travelers will not be screened against that description.[/B] The new procedures replace those that went into effect after the attempted bombing of a jetliner en route to Detroit on Christmas Day. Those rules required extra screening, such as full-body pat-downs, for everyone from, or traveling through, any of these 14 countries: Afghanistan, Algeria, Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Libya, Nigeria, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. The new terror-screening strategy, to be announced Friday, is a result of a review ordered by President Barack Obama. The intelligence-based targeting will be in addition to screening names on terror watch lists. The government's "no fly" list of suspected terrorists, who are banned from flights to, or within, U.S. territory, has about 6,000 names. A Nigerian man, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, has been charged with boarding a Detroit-bound airliner on Christmas Day with a bomb hidden in his underwear. One of the reasons the alleged bomber was able to board the flight in Amsterdam was that his name was not on a U.S. terror watch list. However, officials failed to even share a description of the suspected terrorist. The new policy should significantly decrease the number of innocent travelers from the 14 countries who have been inconvenienced by the extra screening, the official said. In the past three months, senior U.S. security officials have been meeting with foreign countries to discuss how to improve aviation security, and many countries have adopted enhanced screening methods, including the use of body-scanning machines. The U.S. does not have the authority to screen passengers in foreign airports. But if air carriers do not agree to follow the U.S. guidelines for international aviation security, they could be fined and potentially banned from operating flights to the U.S.[/quote] One black sheep does not make the rest of the sheep black.

"Suspect is Caucasian, 18 to 29, and around 300 pounds." Yeah it would be a very slow day for the U.S then.

well obviously a paki cunt is more likely to bomb up an airport than your average white man [highlight](User was permabanned for this post ("2nd racism ban" - Lithifold))[/highlight]

This just means asians and average white people wont be bothered.

[QUOTE=Fables;21118744] Yeah it would be a very slow day for the U.S then.[/QUOTE] Have you been to the U.S. [editline]01:55PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Aurastorm;21118765]well obviously a paki cunt is more likely to bomb up an airport than your average white man[/QUOTE] :|

Well it's better than bogging down the entire airport at least

[QUOTE=Aurastorm;21118765]well obviously a paki cunt is more likely to bomb up an airport than your average white man[/QUOTE] Wow, that's offensive...

[QUOTE=Dmarine;21118814]Wow, that's offensive...[/QUOTE] no, it's true was 9/11 caused by the white man? no. do you see white businessmen going to baghdad just to blow themselves up? no.

[QUOTE=Dmarine;21118814]Wow, that's offensive...[/QUOTE] Yeah, up until 911, most terrorists were white Christians.

[QUOTE=Aurastorm;21118827]no, it's true was 9/11 caused by the white man? no.[/QUOTE] And how do you know? Not that I'm a conspiracy theorist, but there's no way you can prove that 100%.

[QUOTE=Perfumly;21118772]Have you been to the U.S. [editline]01:55PM[/editline] :|[/QUOTE] Oh, should I have increased the number on the weight?

[QUOTE=Fables;21118861]Oh, should I have increased the number on the weight?[/QUOTE] Actually, where I live out of 300 kids in my school there's only one major fatty. A couple slightly overweight but most are really slim.

[QUOTE=Aurastorm;21118827]no, it's true was 9/11 caused by the white man? no. do you see white businessmen going to baghdad just to blow themselves up? no.[/QUOTE] 9/11 wasn't caused by Pakistani people, genius. Osama bin Laden was from Saudi.

[QUOTE=Perfumly;21118851]And how do you know? Not that I'm a conspiracy theorist, but there's no way you can prove that 100%.[/QUOTE] [IMG]http://www.psychologytoday.com/files/u52/osama%20bin%20laden%20Part%202.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://www.debateitout.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/osama-bin-laden.jpg[/IMG]

[QUOTE=Aurastorm;21118884][IMG]http://www.psychologytoday.coama%20bin%20laden%20Part%202.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://www.debateitout.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/bin-laden.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE] Do you think that even if he didn't cause 9/11 he would pass up the opportunity to take credit for it? And yes, because Osama Bin Laden was on the airplane.

[QUOTE=Perfumly;21118906]Do you think that even if he didn't cause 9/11 he would pass up the opportunity to take credit for it? And yes, because Osama Bin Laden was on the airplane.[/QUOTE] [IMG]http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/osama_bin_laden.jpg[/IMG]

[QUOTE=Aurastorm;21118884][IMG]http://www.psychologytoday.com/files/u52/osama%20bin%20laden%20Part%202.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://www.debateitout.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/osama-bin-laden.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE] Osama Bin Laden is not wanted for the 9/11. He was wanted since 1998 for the bombings of US embassies. When asked, the FBI said they didn't have enough proof to show he was liable for the attacks. [url]http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/laden.htm[/url]

[QUOTE=Aurastorm;21118951][IMG]http:n_laden.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE] I can't tell if you're stupid or just trolling

Stop fucking spamming image macros.

You know we wouldn't have to do all this terrorism bullshit if we just pulled out of the middle east and paid them reparations. [editline]03:10PM[/editline] [QUOTE=starpluck;21118982]Stop fucking spamming image macros.[/QUOTE] Image Macros have text in them.

[QUOTE=Perfumly;21118975]I can't tell if you're stupid or just trolling[/QUOTE] either way, ban him

well saying a paki is more likely to blow something up is like saying a black guy is more likely to steal cars, heh not entirely true but the average stereotypes seem to conclude them

[QUOTE=starpluck;21118962]Osama Bin Laden is not wanted for the 9/11. He was wanted since 1998 for the bombings of US embassies. When asked, the FBI said they didn't have enough proof to show he was liable for the attacks. [URL]http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/laden.htm[/URL][/QUOTE] how do you explain this then: [IMG]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_srOhGcGHvik/SbcR2D9ukaI/AAAAAAAACM0/9zqFRm_IwcI/s400/osama-bin-laden_wanted-poster.png[/IMG]

Bin Laden's been dead for some time now.

[QUOTE=radioactive;21119014]You know we wouldn't have to do all this terrorism bullshit if we just pulled out of the middle east and paid them reparations. [/QUOTE] It was actually because of US' policy with Israel I believe.

[QUOTE=Aurastorm;21118827]no, it's true was 9/11 caused by the white man? no. do you see white businessmen going to baghdad just to blow themselves up? no.[/QUOTE] The IRA has something to say to you [img]http://www.topnews.in/files/London-Irish.jpg[/img]

[QUOTE=Aurastorm;21119037]how do you explain this then: [IMG]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/.png[/IMG][/QUOTE] Ok here's how I interpret this situation Aurastorm says something dumb, then pretends to troll in a backpedalling attempt

[QUOTE=starpluck;21119061]It was actually because of US' policy with Israel I believe.[/QUOTE] So the Jews caused 9/11? It all makes sense now.

[QUOTE=Perfumly;21119119]Ok here's how I interpret this situation Aurastorm says something dumb, then pretends to troll in a backpedalling attempt[/QUOTE] You should ban hi- OH WAIT HAW HAW HAW

[QUOTE=Aurastorm;21118827]no, it's true was 9/11 caused by the white man? no. do you see white businessmen going to baghdad just to blow themselves up? no.[/QUOTE] [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_notable_aircraft_hijackings]I want you to read this[/url] and just skim over the names of people in there. Go on, I'll wait.