FBI Requested to Investigate Hillary Clinton for Perjury - Polidicks

[quote=Article] Reps. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, chairman of the Oversight panel, and Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., head of the Judiciary Committee, said in a letter that "evidence collected by the FBI during its investigation of Secretary Clinton's use of a personal email system appears to directly contradict several aspects of her sworn testimony." "In light of those contradictions, the department should investigate and determine whether to prosecute Secretary Clinton for violating statutes that prohibit perjury and false statements to Congress, or any other relevant statutes," the two congressmen wrote.[/quote] [URL="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/07/11/house-gop-request-perjury-investigation-clinton-over-private-email-server.html"]Source[/URL] The FBI needs a formal request from Congress to start an investigation. The Clinton Email case was investigated to determine if classified information was sent or leaked, and if there was criminal intent. That is what was the announcement last week was about, and this request is because FBI director Comey told Congress in his testimony that they need a request to start an investigation. The source also has a timeline of the email investigation.

Good, this is exactly what she's guilty of above anything else.

she really needs to be kicked out of the race

[QUOTE=theevilldeadII;50694651]she really needs to be kicked out of the race[/QUOTE] If she gets kicked out the race then Trump will have actual competition. As of now I see Trump having a guaranteed victory against Hillary specifically because of the FBI's findings. If the DNC finds a substitute or collapses altogether with Hillary then Trump has to go up against either 3rd party candidates becoming relevant for the first time or a democrat who isn't as hated as much as Trump himself is.

[QUOTE=theevilldeadII;50694651]she really needs to be kicked out of the race[/QUOTE] Anyone sane should agree with this. Unfortunately, she somehow has an onslaught of actual [I]supporters [/I](yes, supporters, not reluctant voters) that somehow manage to mental-gymnastic their way out of how absolutely crooked of a woman she is.

[QUOTE=Monkah;50694772]Anyone sane should agree with this. Unfortunately, she somehow has an onslaught of actual [I]supporters [/I](yes, supporters, not reluctant voters) that somehow manage to mental-gymnastic their way out of how absolutely crooked of a woman she is.[/QUOTE] Her supporters are old people and turbo-feminists/SJWs who won't listen to anything at all. Not in that they won't listen to Trump but just in that they parrot what Clinton says. Then there's single issue voters who will vote for her just because she is a woman, just like how people voted for Obama because he is black. The supporters add up to get someone a victory In any case I can't remember an election that was truly based on policy. Kennedy won over Nixon because he was more handsome on the televised debate. Trump won the primaries because he had total control over the discussion rather than agreeable policies. I predict Trump will be more favorable than Hillary if they get to the debates for this reason.

[QUOTE=RIPBILLYMAYS;50694798]they won't listen to Trump but just in that they parrot what Clinton says.[/QUOTE] Are you sure you don't have these two mixed up?

[QUOTE=.Isak.;50694806]Are you sure you don't have these two mixed up?[/QUOTE] TurboSJWs wont listen to anything Trump says because he's branded as a racist Hillbillies wont listen to Clinton because she's a liar and will take away their guns It happens on both sides

[QUOTE=.Isak.;50694806]Are you sure you don't have these two mixed up?[/QUOTE] That it is happening on both sides does not diminish that it is happening on one side.

[QUOTE=RIPBILLYMAYS;50694815]TurboSJWs wont listen to anything Trump says because he's branded as a racist Hillbillies wont listen to Clinton because she's a liar and will take away their guns It happens on both sides[/QUOTE] It's no secret that Clinton and Trump are both crooked in their own way, and both a bad idea to end up as choices for President. The problem is, even listening to what Trump has to say you have to sometimes suspend disbelief when he makes some outlandish proposal that has no real bearing to the status quo in current politics, whether local or international. Clinton is another bad choice because she's deliberately flouted guidelines for keeping classified information safe, is openly in the pay of big businesses, and is a crooked liar on top of that, to say nothing of being charged for perjury in the FBI investigation. Another issue here is people voting Republican for the sake of doing so because Clinton was the one who won the Dem nomination, because they felt 'betrayed', or merely shifting allegiances because they believe Clinton doesn't represent their own ideals like Bernie did, and vice versa when it comes to Republican votes and Trump. The problem is, this whole election is a shitshow from one side to another, and unprecedentedly so. We have two crooks running for office, scandals on both sides, literal diplomatic incidents being caused by presumptive candidates (remember Trump and the whole Russia = ISIS video?) It's come to the point where people would prefer voting for a known devil than potentially let in an unknown, most likely worse one.

[QUOTE=RIPBILLYMAYS;50694745][b]If she gets kicked out the race then Trump will have actual competition.[/b] As of now I see Trump having a guaranteed victory against Hillary specifically because of the FBI's findings. If the DNC finds a substitute or collapses altogether with Hillary then Trump has to go up against either 3rd party candidates becoming relevant for the first time or a democrat who isn't as hated as much as Trump himself is.[/QUOTE] Wow you're in for a big disappointment come November.

[QUOTE=InvaderNouga;50696092]Wow you're in for a big disappointment come November.[/QUOTE] No matter what we're in for a massive disappointment.

[QUOTE=RIPBILLYMAYS;50694745]If she gets kicked out the race then Trump will have actual competition. As of now I see Trump having a guaranteed victory against Hillary specifically because of the FBI's findings. If the DNC finds a substitute or collapses altogether with Hillary then Trump has to go up against either 3rd party candidates becoming relevant for the first time or a democrat who isn't as hated as much as Trump himself is.[/QUOTE] Why would trump have a guaranteed victory, polls seem to point at Clinton winning by quite a margin.

[QUOTE=Cold;50697553]Why would trump have a guaranteed victory, polls seem to point at Clinton winning by quite a margin.[/QUOTE] Hardly worth pointing out. People think all the polls are wrong and their opinion is more accurate - Clinton's winning by a huge margin. Any time someone says "Trump will easily beat Hillary," they're not expressing anything but their own wishful thinking. He has a huge uphill battle to even get a 50/50 chance.

[QUOTE=.Isak.;50697618]Hardly worth pointing out. People think all the polls are wrong and their opinion is more accurate - Clinton's winning by a huge margin. Any time someone says "Trump will easily beat Hillary," they're not expressing anything but their own wishful thinking. He has a huge uphill battle to even get a 50/50 chance.[/QUOTE] I am just curious what their reasoning behind that statement is, i am not expecting them to magically pull some information out of their ass.

[QUOTE=Cold;50698174]I am just curious what their reasoning behind that statement is, i am not expecting them to magically pull some information out of their ass.[/QUOTE] The reasoning I hear is that since Trump shat all over the other republicans in the primary debates, he'll kill her in the debates and win people over. Despite the fact that the general election debates are much more rigid and he'll get slapped down for trying to pull any of his name-calling interrupting bullshit in the general election debates. There honestly isn't reasoning. It's wishful thinking based on hyperbole. He's an awful debater and he'll get shit on in an actual structured debate - the only people who will be convinced by him are the ones who already subscribe to his empty feel-good rhetoric.

[QUOTE=.Isak.;50698271]The reasoning I hear is that since Trump shat all over the other republicans in the primary debates, he'll kill her in the debates and win people over. Despite the fact that the general election debates are much more rigid and he'll get slapped down for trying to pull any of his name-calling interrupting bullshit in the general election debates. There honestly isn't reasoning. It's wishful thinking based on hyperbole. He's an awful debater and he'll get shit on in an actual structured debate - the only people who will be convinced by him are the ones who already subscribe to his empty feel-good rhetoric.[/QUOTE] let's not forget that hillary's campaign has been based around two things: one, that she's a woman, and two, trying to keep what obama has going. when the two of them go head to head in the debates, we'll see who really will get ahead.

[QUOTE=Pops;50698763]let's not forget that hillary's campaign has been based around two things: one, that she's a woman, and two, trying to keep what obama has going. when the two of them go head to head in the debates, we'll see who really will get ahead.[/QUOTE] Or that the media repeatedly attacks Trump's character (which is shit, make no mistake), but ignores Hillary's. They could probably destroy her campaign in a day by talking about her lies and Bill's airplane escapades. All she has to do to win is sit back and let Trump talk, because every time he does it's another disaster.

[QUOTE=unrezt;50698811]Or that the media repeatedly attacks Trump's character (which is shit, make no mistake), but ignores Hillary's. They could probably destroy her campaign in a day by talking about her lies and Bill's airplane escapades.[/QUOTE] Quoted: Someone who obviously doesn't watch the news. Bill's meeting with Lynch was the main story the next day. They were talking about it live on CNN. I was watching it at work.

[QUOTE=Monkah;50694772]Anyone sane should agree with this. Unfortunately, she somehow has an onslaught of actual [I]supporters [/I](yes, supporters, not reluctant voters) that somehow manage to mental-gymnastic their way out of how absolutely crooked of a woman she is.[/QUOTE] because she is a women and the media pushed an narrative

[QUOTE=theevilldeadII;50699869]because she is a women and the media pushed an narrative[/QUOTE] Regardless of what anyone else says, I think it's really just this. A flex of the media that shows how in control of they are of public perception and image.

[QUOTE=InvaderNouga;50696092]Wow you're in for a big disappointment come November.[/QUOTE] Voters are more petty than you'd imagine.