'Fast and Furious' and 'Fifty Shades of Grey' Sequels Get Release Dates - Polidicks

[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CDT1atkW0AAxVA0.png[/IMG] [QUOTE]Fans of the "Fast and Furious" and "Fifty Shades of Grey" franchises have something to celebrate. Release dates for the next installments of each franchise have been announced.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE]"Furious 8" will hit theaters April 14, 2017, while "Fifty Shades Darker" will be released on Feb. 10, 2017, according to Universal Pictures. The third "Fifty Shades" film, "Fifty Shades Freed," will premiere on Feb. 9, 2018.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE]Both franchises have rabid fan bases who are eagerly awaiting sequels.[/QUOTE] [URL="http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/fast-furious-fifty-shades-grey-sequels-release-dates/story?id=30557199"]http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/fast-furious-fifty-shades-grey-sequels-release-dates/story?id=30557199[/URL]

Universal also pushed back Warcraft to June 10th 2016 in this announcement of films :-:.

can we please stop the trend of amazing bad movies and amazingly bad sequels to those movies. fuck, everything is getting a sequel, especially for shit that doesn't deserve it.

There is two reasons why this shouldn't happen Fast and Furious 7 ended the series on a good note, and it shouldn't be extended any longer. For Fifty Shades of Grey, it just sucks.

[QUOTE=Tmaxx;47591385]can we please stop the trend of amazing bad movies and amazingly bad sequels to those movies. fuck, everything is getting a sequel, especially for shit that doesn't deserve it.[/QUOTE] I wouldn't exactly call the Fast&Furious franchise bad overall. Cheap thrills sure, but not outright horrible. Plus Vin Diesel is awesome Fifty Shades can go die though.

I thought Fifty Shades was horribly received? I might have kicked ass opening weekend, but that'll happen when you have a high-budget adaptation of a massively popular book. But, since every review I read about it claimed that it was a total flop, a sequel seems doomed to fail. Fast and the Furious makes sense, at least. They're dumb movies, but they don't have to be smart. They're high octane popcorn flicks that people will reliably return to see sequels of just because they're simple and entertaining. You don't need a compelling story or hard-hitting dialog when you've got cars drifting through convenience stores, or whatever.

I watched Fast and Furious 7. Never seen any other FnF. If the movie lasted a bit more than one hour it'd be fine, but 137 fucking minutes? Way [I]too much[/I]. The sillyness gets drowned by the boringness.

[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;47591440]I thought Fifty Shades was horribly received? I might have kicked ass opening weekend, but that'll happen when you have a high-budget adaptation of a massively popular book. But, since every review I read about it claimed that it was a total flop, a sequel seems doomed to fail. Fast and the Furious makes sense, at least. They're dumb movies, but they don't have to be smart. They're high octane popcorn flicks that people will reliably return to see sequels of just because they're simple and entertaining. You don't need a compelling story or hard-hitting dialog when you've got cars drifting through convenience stores, or whatever.[/QUOTE] kicking ass opening weekend is all execs need to think "this movie ROCKS lets get another"

Fifty Shades of Grey 2: Even More Greyer

[quote]"Fifty Shades Darker" will be released on Feb. 10, 2017[/quote] they should have called it fifty-one shades of grey

Fifty Shades glorifies abuse. Why is this going to be a sequel? Fast and Furious is just stupid with shit acting and shit special effects. The only good things are the cars.

I thought the guy actor walked off the set for sequels to Fifty Shades?

[QUOTE=agentfazexx;47591533]Fifty Shades glorifies abuse. Why is this going to be a sequel? Fast and Furious is just stupid with shit acting and shit special effects. The only good things are the cars.[/QUOTE] Good thing it's a franchise based entirely around car racing.

[QUOTE=BackSapper;47591346]Universal also pushed back Warcraft to June 10th 2016 in this announcement of films :-:.[/QUOTE] no that was star wars, the original release would have been december 18th, one day after star wars 7

Wait don't they always say like "Yeah one last ride!" to each other in like every furious movie? :v:

[QUOTE=orcywoo6;47591780]Wait don't they always say like "Yeah one last ride!" to each other in like every furious movie? :v:[/QUOTE] Part of the bad acting and story

[QUOTE=orcywoo6;47591780]Wait don't they always say like "Yeah one last ride!" to each other in like every furious movie? :v:[/QUOTE] One last ride to the next dairy farm where they're gonna milk the shit out of it. I didn't even watch fifty shades of gray anywhere, even for free, I wouldn't watch it.

I actually watched 50 shades. Well, half of it. The only film I walked out of cinema from.

[QUOTE=DoktorAkcel;47591865]I actually watched 50 shades. Well, half of it. The only film I walked out of cinema from.[/QUOTE] That bad? Damn I must see it, but I hate walking out on movies. It feels like I've been cheated on, but worse.

[QUOTE=kweh;47591901]That bad? Damn I must see it, but I hate walking out on movies. It feels like I've been cheated on, but worse.[/QUOTE] I saw some of it. I was like wtf am I watching. It's a really bad movie.

[QUOTE=kweh;47591901]That bad? Damn I must see it, but I hate walking out on movies. It feels like I've been cheated on, but worse.[/QUOTE] "that's my playroom" "like, xbox and stuff?"

[QUOTE=DoktorAkcel;47591865]I actually watched 50 shades. Well, half of it. The only film I walked out of cinema from.[/QUOTE] im the same - its the only film i've walked out of. its not even really a movie, in the traditional sense, because there is basically no plot. it's essentially just an extended sexual daydream.

[QUOTE=sloppy_joes;47591947]im the same - its the only film i've walked out of. its not even really a movie, in the traditional sense, because there is basically no plot. it's essentially just an extended sexual daydream.[/QUOTE] Basically porn but without nudity?

[QUOTE={TFS} Rock Su;47592029]Basically porn but without nudity?[/QUOTE] They scaled it down even further from that.

they should cross over Fifty Shades of Fury

[QUOTE=Corndog Ninja;47592242]they should cross over Fifty Shades of Fury[/QUOTE] Fast Fifty

[QUOTE=Big Dumb American;47591440]I thought Fifty Shades was horribly received? I might have kicked ass opening weekend, but that'll happen when you have a high-budget adaptation of a massively popular book. But, since every review I read about it claimed that it was a total flop, a sequel seems doomed to fail.[/QUOTE] Half a billion dollars worldwide. HALF A BILLION! Those kinds of movies are dirt cheap to make, no stars, no big name director, no huge special effects. It's money in the bank. I'm actually surprised it's going to take two years to make another one. The momentum might be lost by then.

[QUOTE=agentfazexx;47591533]Fifty Shades glorifies abuse. Why is this going to be a sequel? Fast and Furious is just stupid with shit acting and [B]shit special effects.[/B] The only good things are the cars.[/QUOTE] car drop from planes: practical, done in two shots, the drop, and the landing paul walker's double running up the bus: practical, one take the tower car jumps: physical on a stage through replicas you want to rethink "shit special effects"?

[QUOTE=Hat-Wearing Man;47592256]Fast Fifty[/QUOTE] The sad part is I really could envision there being 50 Fast and the Furious movies

[QUOTE=kweh;47591901]That bad? Damn I must see it, but I hate walking out on movies. It feels like I've been cheated on, but worse.[/QUOTE] Well, it was well-made in terms of production, but that plot (more like non-existense of it) and REALLY slow storymoving is not something I can endure for more than 30 minutes.