News Corp Withdraws Bid for BSkyB - Polidicks

[release] [h2]News Corp Withdraws Bid for BSkyB[/h2] [b]Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation has announced that it is dropping its planned bid to take full ownership of satellite broadcaster BSkyB.[/b] The announcement came as the House of Commons prepared to vote for a motion supported by all major party leaders calling on Mr Murdoch to do so. The move follows a scandal over phone hacking by its UK newspaper group. News Corp chairman Chase Carey said the bid had become "too difficult to progress in this climate". The scandal has already led to the closure of the UK's biggest-selling newspaper, the News of the World. [b]Market reaction[/b] "We believed that the proposed acquisition of BSkyB by News Corporation would benefit both companies, but it has become clear that it is too difficult to progress in this climate," said News Corp deputy chairman and president Chase Carey in a statement. "News Corporation remains a committed long-term shareholder in BSkyB. We are proud of the success it has achieved and our contribution to it." BSkyB's share price briefly dropped following the announcement to about 4% down for the day, before recovering. The company's share price has fallen some 20% since peaking a week ago, and is trading at a level not seen since News Corp first announced its bid plans in June last year. "We remain very confident in the broadly based growth opportunity for BSkyB," said the firm's chief executive, Jeremy Darroch following News Corp's announcement. [b]'Huge humiliation'[/b] A spokesman for Prime Minister David Cameron welcomed the news: "As the prime minister has said, the business should focus on clearing up the mess and getting its own house in order." The Labour leader, Ed Miliband, called it "a victory for people up and down this country who have been appalled by the revelations of the phone hacking scandal and the failure of News International to take responsibility". Liberal Democrat deputy leader Simon Hughes said that "the sun is now setting on the Murdoch empire". The BBC's business editor Robert Peston said: "It's a huge humiliation. This was [News Corp's] biggest investment plan of the moment. It was one of the biggest investments they've ever wanted to make. "It is an extraordinary reversal of corporate fortune... And questions will now be asked whether this is the full extent of the damage to the empire." News Corp already owns 39% of BSkyB, but may be compelled to give up even this minority stake if it is deemed not to be a "fit and proper person" by regulator Ofcom following the conclusion of current police investigations. Robert Peston added there had been "a lot of speculation" that Mr Murdoch might now want to sell his UK newspapers, but the current state of the industry made them less attractive to potential buyers. "The question is, who is going to pay him the price that they are worth? He will not want to sell those papers at a loss." [b]Public inquiry[/b] Mr Cameron has asked Lord Justice Leveson to oversee a public inquiry into the News of the World scandal and media regulation. In a statement to the Commons, he said the inquiry would begin as "quickly as possible" and would be in two parts - an investigation of wrongdoing in the press and the police, and a review of regulation in the press. The judge will have powers to call media proprietors, editors and politicians to give evidence under oath, the PM said. Mr Cameron said those who sanctioned wrongdoing should have no further role in running a media company in the UK. He said Lord Justice Leveson, assisted by a panel of senior independent figures, would make recommendations for a better way of regulating the press which "supports their freedom, plurality and independence from government but which also demands the highest ethical and professional standards". He will also make recommendations about the future conduct of relations between politicians and the press. Mr Cameron told MPs he would require all ministers and civil servants to record meetings with senior editors and media executives to help make the UK government "one of the most open in the world". Mr Miliband welcomed the proposal, arguing it must be imposed retrospectively, so that he and Mr Cameron publish all details of meetings with media executives dating back to the last general election. The prime minister was previously criticised for meeting Rupert Murdoch, head of News Corporation, in Downing Street soon after the election, because Mr Murdoch did not walk through the front door. Newspapers which did not support the government ran stories of "secret meetings". Earlier at prime minister's questions, Mr Cameron said a "firestorm" was engulfing parts of the media and police, and those who had committed offences must be prosecuted. Mr Miliband said it was an insult to the family of murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler, whose phone was allegedly hacked, that Rebekah Brooks was still News International's chief executive. Mr Cameron responded: "She was right to resign, that resignation should have been accepted. There needs to be root and branch change at this entire organisation. "What has happened at this company is disgraceful - it's got to be addressed at every level." [b]In other developments:[/b] [quote]News International's legal manager Tom Crone, who primarily worked at the News of the World and on the Sun, has left the company The Sun has defended its story revealing Mr Brown's youngest son Fraser had cystic fibrosis. It has released a video of the man it says was the source - the man's face is not revealed and his voice is disguised to protect his identity The prime minister is due to meet the parents of Milly Dowler The Australian arm of Mr Murdoch's media empire is to investigate all payments made to contributors since 2008 In the US, Senate Commerce Committee chairman Jay Rockefeller called for an investigation into whether phone hacking targeted any American citizens and whether journalists working for News Corp had broken US law Shares in News Corp have fallen 14% since 4 July, wiping about $5bn off the company's value Meanwhile, Labour's communications chief Tom Baldwin is facing renewed questions over claims he handled private information which was gained illegally during his years at the Times newspaper, another News International publication.[/quote] The former Conservative deputy chairman Lord Ashcroft makes the allegations in a blog posting on ConservativeHome, which he owns. Mr Baldwin has not responded to the claims. [/release] [url]http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-14142307[/url]

Victory! They'll try again. Now NI won't be proclaimed "unfit", of course.

Good, this guy has his fingers in too many pies already.

[QUOTE=HubmaN;31089964]Victory! They'll try again. Now NI won't be proclaimed "unfit", of course.[/QUOTE] OFCOM are still looking into if News Corp. are "fit and proper" to own 39.1% of BskyB at the moment. Might be more specific (like if James Murdoch is "fit and proper" enough to be in charge of BskyB).

HoC are circlejerking right now. [editline]13th July 2011[/editline] Gordon Brown is in his element again. [editline]13th July 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Jsm;31091156]OFCOM are still looking into if News Corp. are "fit and proper" to own 39.1% of BskyB at the moment. Might be more specific (like if James Murdoch is "fit and proper" enough to be in charge of BskyB).[/QUOTE] That's wonderful! [editline]13th July 2011[/editline] God, I want to punch Bercow in the face. [editline]13th July 2011[/editline] Broon is now defending his record on media legislation (read: how many tory proposals he's shot down) [editline]13th July 2011[/editline] According to Twitter, this was NOTW's obit for Maggie: [img]http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_loa4fv4eeb1qanglz.jpg[/img] [editline]13th July 2011[/editline] Brown is/was now presenting his proposals for new media legislation. [editline]13th July 2011[/editline] Labour's still afraid to recognize in specifics their own NI shenanigans... it's a pity, because they're starving the media frenzy like that. Taking in account Brown's defense and the asides, Labour's record is perfectly defensible, given the catch-all "we feared Murdoch". [editline]13th July 2011[/editline] Chairman of the CMS select committee is wrapping things up... [editline]13th July 2011[/editline] Former CMS chairman (Lab) is heaping on Rebekah and Murdoch. Hilarity. [editline]13th July 2011[/editline] Con CMS leader is defending SkyN and BSB, just for balance. [editline]13th July 2011[/editline] And now a comparison to FoxN. He says it won't happen, apparently because of American exceptionalism (bollox). A caution to base things on evidence. [editline]13th July 2011[/editline] And now Lab backbencher speaking on how Col gov *wasn't* working against NI interests. [editline]13th July 2011[/editline] IndLab bb brings up the DM... [editline]13th July 2011[/editline] Wraps up, asks for vigilance - Murdoch must not return [editline]13th July 2011[/editline] DUP wants everyone to admit - once again, but in specifics - the NI thrall. "Concentration of power", "undermining democracy", etc. [editline]13th July 2011[/editline] Oh, it's Sammy Wilson. Still, lovely view on the devolved side of things. [editline]13th July 2011[/editline] Con backbencher's bringing up Google as an example of concentration of power. This should be interesting. [editline]13th July 2011[/editline] Philip Lee - a very, very good point, actually - Google as an aggregator. UK has no control, no check and balance, over aggregators. My faith in HoC is restored. [editline]13th July 2011[/editline] Chris Bryant is smacking down on BSkyB's existing monopoly status as well. [editline]13th July 2011[/editline] Wrapups are beginning on the marathon three-hour... [editline]13th July 2011[/editline] Meeting is adjourned. [editline]13th July 2011[/editline] DSpeaker tries to lighten things up by lording it over the Lords. [editline]13th July 2011[/editline] And that's it for the extraordinary debate - goodnight.

The edits, there's too many of them! All is lost!

I'm amazed by how few meaningful things you can say in so many edits.

[QUOTE=bobsmit;31101900]I'm amazed by how few meaningful things you can say in so many edits.[/QUOTE] Best Opposition Debate in ages, that's what.