More nails to the coffin on Global Warming Alarmists? - General

It seems pretty much every major news media outlet's gone dead silent on the topic so I don't feel this belongs in In The News. Since the hacking of the research facility in Britain, it seems its just all out war now against Global Warming alarmists. A[url=http://www.climatescience.org.nz/images/PDFs/global_warming_nz2.pdf] PDF (click me!)[/url] file from climatescience.org is now accusing the New Zealand adviser for the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric research of adjusting temperature charts to make it appear there's a warming trend. Since its a PDF I can't just copy+paste the 8 pages for you to read, click on link to read for yourself. Edit: Seems Facepunch is about 50/50 on this issue, which I find interesting.

Because all scientists have no clue what they are talking about and spend their time lying to the entire world. They are obviously taking stuff out of context, this "unadjusted" data that they apparently STOLE from the government is probably something else, or just plain made up.

Who cares about anything related to Global Warming anymore? That's so 2005.

You mean those hacked files from the anonymous Russian hackers? :downs: Yeah, I'd trust the future of my planet based on that kind of evidence!

I don't see what's wrong about saying global warming is worse than it is

[QUOTE=Kondor;18591698]I don't see what's wrong about saying global warming is worse than it is[/QUOTE] Well that's actually a really bad thing, but even if this is true it's the fucking advisory board of [I]New Zealand.[/I]

[QUOTE=Mr. Mcguffin;18591745][b]Well that's actually a really bad thing[/b], but even if this is true it's the fucking advisory board of [I]New Zealand.[/I][/QUOTE] You didn't answer what I said at all, I don't see why it's a bad thing

[QUOTE=Kondor;18591769]You didn't answer what I said at all, I don't see why it's a bad thing[/QUOTE] Because skewing data compromises integrity. But Climatescience.org seems to be a pro global warming website. If global warming really is a conspiracy, why are they reporting this?

save darfu- who?

[QUOTE=Mr. Mcguffin;18591795][b]Because skewing data compromises integrity.[/b] But Climatescience.org seems to be a pro global warming website. If global warming really is a conspiracy, why are they reporting this?[/QUOTE] Which is a problem because...

My opinion is that the Earth isn't getting warmer, but the sun's getting larger/hotter. However, didn't they already prove C02 can't cause global warming a few months ago?

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOOc5yiIWkg[/media] [editline]09:24PM[/editline] global warming analysts are nuts but dont tell th89 i said so

[QUOTE=Gmod_Fan77;18591824]My opinion is that the Earth isn't getting warmer, but the sun's getting larger/hotter. However, didn't they already prove C02 can't cause global warming a few months ago?[/QUOTE] No. CO2 is insulative and so heat is retained in the atmosphere

[QUOTE=Gmod_Fan77;18591824]My opinion is that the Earth isn't getting warmer, but the sun's getting larger/hotter. However, didn't they already prove C02 can't cause global warming a few months ago?[/QUOTE] Can I see your years of study to support this theory please

[QUOTE=Gmod_Fan77;18591824]My opinion is that the Earth isn't getting warmer, but the sun's getting larger/hotter. However, didn't they already prove C02 can't cause global warming a few months ago?[/QUOTE] 1. No, that's stupid. You're saying the sun just so happened to start rapidly increasing in size and temperature during the industrial revolution? 2. No they didn't. [editline]02:28AM[/editline] [QUOTE=rilez;18591833][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOOc5yiIWkg[/media] [editline]09:24PM[/editline] global warming analysts are nuts but dont tell th89 i said so[/QUOTE] He's funny he must be right.

[QUOTE=Gmod_Fan77;18591824]My opinion is that the Earth isn't getting warmer, but the sun's getting larger/hotter. However, didn't they already prove C02 can't cause global warming a few months ago?[/QUOTE] what was your opinion on light in a vacuum again?

[QUOTE=Mr. Mcguffin;18591879]He's funny he must be right.[/QUOTE] he's right because he's right but ok

You didn't get quite what George Carlin was talking about.

[QUOTE=rilez;18591897]he's right because he's right but ok[/QUOTE] What brilliant fucking logic. Oh, and by the way, I'm right so I must be right. Please follow my law now.

[QUOTE=thisispain;18591907]You didn't get quite what George Carlin was talking about.[/QUOTE] what, that humans have no effect on the planet? that is the new idea behind global warming after all; that it's caused by us

[QUOTE=rilez;18591929]what, that humans have no effect on the planet? that is the new idea behind global warming after all; that it's caused by us[/QUOTE] Uh, what he's saying is that we're fucked. Did you even watch the video.

[QUOTE=Wolf_Marine;18591258]It seems pretty much every major news media outlet's gone dead silent on the topic so I don't feel this belongs in In The News. Since the hacking of the research facility in Britain, it seems its just all out war now against Global Warming alarmists. A[url=http://www.climatescience.org.nz/images/PDFs/global_warming_nz2.pdf] PDF (click me!)[/url] file from climatescience.org is now accusing the New Zealand adviser for the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric research of adjusting temperature charts to make it appear there's a warming trend. Since its a PDF I can't just copy+paste the 8 pages for you to read, click on link to read for yourself.[/QUOTE] You can't just screenshot them?

good, never believed global warming in the first place :foxnews:

[QUOTE=Wolf_Marine;18591258]It seems pretty much every major news media outlet's gone dead silent on the topic so I don't feel this belongs in In The News.[/QUOTE]They went silent ever since Al Gore released his 2004 report citing the dangerously high amounts of CO2 being released by politicians and liberals yelling about global warming every minute as the leading contributor to greenhouse gases and the rise of global warming. Shortly thereafter, the "Shut The Fuck Up And Save the Planet" movement began. They didn't tell anyone because that would emit CO2.

[QUOTE=Mr. Mcguffin;18591946]Uh, what he's saying is that we're fucked. Did you even watch the video.[/QUOTE] yeah I did, the point he was making is we have no significant impact on the planet and that we're one little spot on a 4 billion year time line that will probably keep going whether we're around or not if you don't like the fact george carlin, a comedian, didn't give a fuck about our interpretation of global warming, here's one of the few professors in the world who probably has the balls to say something against global warming (or at least the current global warming hypothesis about CO2 emissions): [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOLkze-9GcI[/media] skip to about 1:26

[QUOTE=rilez;18592034]yeah I did, the point he was making is we have no significant impact on the planet and that we're one little spot on a 4 billion year time line that will probably keep going whether we're around or not if you don't like the fact george carlin, a comedian, doesn't give a fuck about global warming, here's one of the few professors in the world who probably has the balls to say something against global warming (or at least the current global warming hypothesis about CO2 emissions): [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOLkze-9GcI[/media] skip to about 1:26[/QUOTE] No, he said the planet will live, but we'll die. That's the point. He's saying that nobody cares about the planet, they care about themselves. It's called subtext, asshole. And I'm sorry, but one fucking professor doesn't trump the whole field of climatology. This isn't a penis measuring contest, but if it was I'd still win.

[QUOTE=Mr. Mcguffin;18592077]No, he said the planet will live, but we'll die. That's the point. He's saying that nobody cares about the planet, they care about themselves. It's called subtext, asshole. And I'm sorry, but one fucking professor doesn't trump the whole field of climatology. This isn't a penis measuring contest, but if it was I'd still win.[/QUOTE] that's very close minded of you, you could atleast watch the video before forming an opinion [editline]09:43PM[/editline] and if you'd read my post I realize that was the point, [B]we're one little spot on a 4 billion year time line that will probably keep going whether we're around or not[/B]

[QUOTE=rilez;18592108]that's very close minded of you, you could atleast watch the video before forming an opinion[/QUOTE] Why should I take the time to refute the claims of a solitary professor so I can prove to some idiot on the internet who doesn't even have enough intelligence to tell me what the professor was saying himself that global warming is an actual threat? Fuck that. I'm watching Tron. And I'd rather be alive than not, asshole. Keep your stupid as shit nihilism to yourself.

[QUOTE=Mr. Mcguffin;18592143]Why should I take the time to refute the claims of a solitary professor so I can prove to some idiot on the internet who doesn't even have enough intelligence to tell me what the professor was saying himself that global warming is an actual threat? Fuck that. I'm watching Tron.[/QUOTE] grr!!! some idiot on the internet doesn't agree with the current global warming hypothesis!!!

[QUOTE=rilez;18592163]grr!!! some idiot on the internet doesn't agree with the current global warming hypothesis!!![/QUOTE] That's not at all what I said, but thanks for failing at reading comprehension yet again.