• Federal Court reinstates corporate ownership of human genes for breast cancer
    15 replies, posted
[quote="Natural News"](NaturalNews) Reversing a previous decision by a US District Court that declared gene patenting to be invalid, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) recently ruled in opposition, declaring that certain gene variants are supposedly unnatural and can thus be legally patented by biotechnology companies. Myriad Genetics & Laboratories, a molecular diagnostics company out of Salt Lake City, Ut., had filed patents for BRCA1 and BRCA2, two genes allegedly linked to predicting breast cancer risk. Because the company had supposedly omitted certain so-called noncoding "junk" regions from the genes, Myriad alleged that these genes were their own intellectual property. Last year, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and others challenged the patents on these and five other genes that had been filed by Myriad. US District Court Judge Robert W. Sweet, who heard the case, ended up issuing a 152-page decision ruling against the patents because the genes, after all, do exist naturally in every woman's body ([url]http://www.naturalnews.com/028492_B[/url]...). But CAFC sees things differently. The mere act of pulling BRCA1 and BRCA2 out of their natural gene sequences or of altering them in some other way apparently renders them unnatural and open game for patenting. The judgment even made the bold declaration that "[t]he molecules as claimed do not exist in nature." So this essentially means that any doctor or medical specialist who conducts tests or analyses involving BRCA1 or BRCA2 will have to first gain permission from Myriad to do so. And just like with patented genetically-modified organisms (GMO), use of the patented genes will likely come at a price in the form of mandatory royalty fees. "The human genome, like the structure of blood, air or water, was discovered, not created," said Chris Hansen, a staff lawyer from the ACLU, in response to Myriad's original patent filings. "There is an endless amount of information on genes that begs for further discovery, and gene patents put up unacceptable barriers to the free exchange of ideas." The Association for Molecular Pathology, the American College of Medical Genetics, the American Society for Clinical Pathology, and the College of American Pathologists were all plaintiffs in the case against Myriad and the US Patent and Trademark Office. Sources for this article include: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20755-breast-cancer-gene-patent-reinstated.html [/quote] [url]http://www.naturalnews.com/034301_breast_cancer_genes_intellectual_property.html[/url] I for one welcome our corporate overlords.
how is this what the i can't believe they're still letting corporations claim ownership of genes
What the fuck? Go to the supreme court with this.
[QUOTE=Natural News] "The human genome, like the structure of blood, air or water, was discovered, not created," said Chris Hansen [/QUOTE] [IMG]http://www.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_296w/WashingtonPost/Content/Blogs/celebritology/StandingArt/hansen2.jpg?uuid=1lkJfKMuEeCEfDuKiwY_ag[/IMG]
Face-fucking-palm. Wonder what how much filthy lucre that judge went home with.
The year is 2011...
Legislation that prevents people like this from ever attaining a position of power would be good. This is harmful to our entire race. Having the most powerful nation on earth ruled by retards, religious zealots and children.
I would like to patent the brain cells, please. Also, I demand periodic payments for their use.
[QUOTE=gufu;33544160]I would like to patent the brain cells, please. Also, I demand periodic payments for their use.[/QUOTE] Well you won't be getting any money from the US government that's for sure
[quote], declaring that certain gene variants are supposedly unnatural and can thus be legally patented by biotechnology companies.[/quote] How are gene variants unnatural? What, are these genes made of plastic or someshit?
[img]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_shiz8_n4Aec/TTaVZOwE9yI/AAAAAAAAA-E/jxQ-dOBEKI4/s640/Michael-Crichton-Next.jpg[/img]
Copyrighting a gene that could potentially save somebodies life is disgusting.
[QUOTE=gamefreek76;33544315]Copyrighting a gene that could potentially save somebodies life is disgusting.[/QUOTE] That's been happening with medicines and safety mechanisms for machinery for years. What's causing concern is the fact that unlike those, genes are natural and could be developed in a human by chance, and they could theoretically end up being charged for their own parentage.
[QUOTE=Capitulazyguy;33544473]That's been happening with medicines and safety mechanisms for machinery for years. What's causing concern is the fact that unlike those, genes are natural and could be developed in a human by chance, and they could theoretically end up being charged for their own parentage.[/QUOTE] Brb, patenting "being white."
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.