[QUOTE]Charged with murder and fearing for his life in an overcrowded Peruvian prison, Joran van der Sloot reportedly wants to make a deal: He says he'll lead Aruban officials to Natalee Holloway's remains if he gets a transfer to a prison in the Caribbean island.
According to Radio Netherlands Worldwide, 22-year-old van der Sloot is claiming he will discuss the location of Holloway's body with Aruban officials only if he is sent back to Aruba, where he was twice arrested but never charged in the 2005 disappearance of the Alabama teen. According to Peru's El Comercio newspaper, van der Sloot, who authorities say confessed to the murder of Peruvian business student Stephany Flores, 21, is scared he won't survive in Lima's Miguel Castro Castro prison.
"I don't want to be imprisoned in Peru," he told police. "I am afraid I will be killed."
Though isolated from an estimated 2,300 fellow prisoners, van der Sloot's fears have reportedly prompted him to offer to come clean about the Holloway case.
"He let slip that he knew the place where this person was buried," Peru's chief of criminal police, Gen. Cesar Guardia, told The Associated Press.
But officials are unsure if van der Sloot is telling the truth based on dubious claims he has made in the past. He has made previous attempts to sell information about Holloway's disappearance and was recently nabbed in an FBI sting allegedly trying to extort money from the Holloway family.
In the FBI sting, van der Sloot was secretly videotaped at an Aruba hotel talking to a lawyer for Holloway's mother, saying the girl died after he pushed her and she fell backward, hitting her head on a rock, according to an FBI affidavit excerpted by the AP. He said his late father, who was a judge in Aruba, helped him bury Holloway's body in the foundation of a house, but no body was found there. Later, van der Sloot admitted in an email that his account was a lie.
The FBI has come under fire for baiting van der Sloot with $25,000 that may have funded his trip to South America.
Van der Sloot's attorneys now say the Dutchman's confession in Flores' murder was coerced. According to a police report obtained by the AP, police who arrested him in Chile and quickly extradited him to Peru after Flores' death on May 30 said van der Sloot claimed an unidentified robber beat Flores to death in his hotel room.
"A man came out of the bathroom blocking the access door with a knife in his hand. On the bed was another man with a gun," the report quotes him as saying. "The man with the knife said to be quiet, but Stephany began talking in a loud voice and he hit her in the face, making her nose bleed."
In his previous confession, Peruvian authorities said van der Sloot admitted to beating Flores and breaking her neck after finding her searching his laptop about his past ties to the Holloway case. Van der Sloot said he met Flores while playing poker at a casino.[/QUOTE]
[URL="http://www.aolnews.com/crime/article/joran-van-der-sloot-offers-natalee-holloways-location-for-aruba-prison/19514386?icid=main|main|dl1|link1|http://www.aolnews.com/crime/article/joran-van-der-sloot-offers-natalee-holloways-location-for-aruba-prison/19514386"]Source[/URL]
What a douchebag
He ended the life of a 21 year old woman. I say whatever happens to him in jail happens.
Van der sloot
lol
He killed two people.
Why should we give a fuck if a bunch of dirty prisoners in Peru rape him to death? Goosh goosh.
[QUOTE=Omali;22593850]He killed two people.
Why should we give a fuck if a bunch of dirty prisoners in Peru rape him to death? Goosh goosh.[/QUOTE]
not everyone is blood thirsty like you
[QUOTE=JDK721v2;22593894]not everyone is blood thirsty like you[/QUOTE]
Van der Sloot was. And hopefully so will the other inmates.
[QUOTE=JDK721v2;22593894]not everyone is blood thirsty like you[/QUOTE]
I'm not bloodthirsty, I just have no empathy for people who expect better treatment when they wind up in prison because they murdered someone/multiple people.
That would be good to find the remains, but then again... He deserves the shit he is getting.
[QUOTE=urbanmonkey;22594502]Van der Sloot was. And hopefully so will the other inmates.[/QUOTE]
So its a-ok to kill someone because they're a murderer? Looks like someone is blood thirsty, and its not van der sloot.
[QUOTE=Ziron;22594759]So its a-ok to kill someone because they're a murderer? Looks like someone is blood thirsty, and its not van der sloot.[/QUOTE]
How is he not bloodthirsty despite his multiple murders?
[QUOTE=Ziron;22594759]So its a-ok to kill someone because they're a murderer? Looks like someone is blood thirsty, and its not van der sloot.[/QUOTE]
In the US it's more cost effective to keep someone alive and let them rot for the rest of their lives than to execute them. I'm just saying that you don't get to kill one girl (potentially by accident) and bury her body, only to murder a second girl because she had the audacity to Google your name, and then request to be transferred to a "safer" prison.
Aside from that, I don't see how advocating for the death penalty is "bloodthirsty." Nowadays, the death penalty is quick and painless, practically like going to sleep (I refer to lethal injection of course). If anything, the death penalty is more humane than the alternative: Multiple life sentences without parole. That's decades of time subjecting the prisoner to all the dangers of prison on a daily basis, as well as the psychological effects prison has on a person's mind. Considering the shit that goes on in prisons anywhere, a multiple life sentence sounds pretty inhumane to me.
I am far from the "eye for an eye" Old Testament values person, and if you look at the situation from the way I've laid it out above, death by lethal injection sounds like the more humane method to me.
I get the feeling Van Der Sloot may well be sociopathic, in which case he still needs to be removed from society for his own good and those around him, because he just doesn't understand why you can't kill people for doing something like Googling you.
[QUOTE=Omali;22595135]In the US it's more cost effective to keep someone alive and let them rot for the rest of their lives than to execute them. I'm just saying that you don't get to kill one girl (potentially by accident) and bury her body, only to murder a second girl because she had the audacity to Google your name, and then request to be transferred to a "safer" prison.
Aside from that, I don't see how advocating for the death penalty is "bloodthirsty." Nowadays, the death penalty is quick and painless, practically like going to sleep (I refer to lethal injection of course). If anything, the death penalty is more humane than the alternative: Multiple life sentences without parole. That's decades of time subjecting the prisoner to all the dangers of prison on a daily basis, as well as the psychological effects prison has on a person's mind. Considering the shit that goes on in prisons anywhere, a multiple life sentence sounds pretty inhumane to me.
I am far from the "eye for an eye" Old Testament values person, and if you look at the situation from the way I've laid it out above, death by lethal injection sounds like the more humane method to me.
I get the feeling Van Der Sloot may well be sociopathic, in which case he still needs to be removed from society for his own good and those around him, because he just doesn't understand why you can't kill people for doing something like Googling you.[/QUOTE]
The BEST way to show that we as a society appose the taking of life is by killing people.
[QUOTE=Kybalt;22595289]The BEST way to show that we as a society appose the taking of life is by killing people.[/QUOTE]
Wasn't sure whether to rate bad reading or bad spelling, but if you'd read my post you'd know that my main point was that a man who murdered two people should not be dictating the terms of his imprisonment.
Van Der Sloot is in a Peruvian prison for a reason: That is where he'll be tried for murdering the Flores girl.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.