[video=youtube;uYQKbTD2rX4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYQKbTD2rX4[/video]
Looks a lot cooler than what I thought from the original announcement.
This has made me so much more hype.
Despite the naysayers, I knew from the start this was going to be an interesting game. This is such an unexplored setting in pretty much every form of media aside from books. I love it.
They're doing something new, and I'm in full support of it.
Kinda joked about this when it was first announced, but now I'm starting to think this could be really awesome. A lot of AAA game devs seem to be taking notes from all the early access survival titles and now we're starting to see it.
Why does the HUD always look the same. Come on, is it that hard to change the icons.
I dont know if its just me, but made up languages are super annoying to hear while Im reading the text in English. I get that it creates more immersion(?) for the era the game is set in but eh
[QUOTE=InfectedPotato;49618526]I dont know if its just me, but made up languages are super annoying to hear while Im reading the text in English. I get that it creates more immersion(?) for the era the game is set in but eh[/QUOTE]
you're just getting the taste of what the life is like for the rest of us
[QUOTE=WhyNott;49618540]you're just getting the taste of what the life is like for the rest of us[/QUOTE]
I've lived in my different countries where English is not the main language. What I mean is that they're going out of their way to create an entirely new language when imo they could just record the dialogue in an actual language. I guess it saves time to just do one universal language?
Its just me nitpicking and complaining about nothing, admittedly.
[QUOTE=InfectedPotato;49618526]I dont know if its just me, but made up languages are super annoying to hear while Im reading the text in English. I get that it creates more immersion(?) for the era the game is set in but eh[/QUOTE]
i like how they had linguistics to actually create a primitive language that would be used in that era.
For me, it's like these developers had no idea what to do next with the far cry franchise, and went on this idea and still give it a name, "far cry".
It would have been better to call it: Primal.
But i will skip this one for sure. This isn't really far cry for me on the plate. Like what happened with co-op? That's what kept me playing with a friend. And even for continuing the story mode.
[QUOTE=InfectedPotato;49618576]I've lived in my different countries where English is not the main language. What I mean is that they're going out of their way to create an entirely new language when imo they could just record the dialogue in an actual language. I guess it saves time to just do one universal language?
Its just me nitpicking and complaining about nothing, admittedly.[/QUOTE]
It's not a 100% made-up language tho
[video=youtube;9jlcV7DYL3o]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jlcV7DYL3o[/video]
[video=youtube;ErXa5PyHj4I]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ErXa5PyHj4I[/video]
I stand corrected. I had no idea, my bad.
[QUOTE=TornadoAP;49615389]Despite the naysayers, I knew from the start this was going to be an interesting game. This is such an unexplored setting in pretty much every form of media aside from books. I love it.[/QUOTE]
why are people disagreeing with this? it's a vast period of our history that pretty much every movie and game ignores which boggles my mind
i didn't think it looked groundbreaking but at least it's doing something that actually takes place in an original setting where like 90% of human history occured
[editline]s[/editline]
and by setting i mean the very concept of hunter gatherers
[editline]e[/editline]
anything different from the million shooty shooty mcbang bang games pretending to be GRITTY and REALISTIC could be good
He should have mentioned that the gameplay (at least the whole tame an animal bit) is pretty much fleshed out from Far Cry 4's Shangri-La sections.
If it has the same fucked up bugs as the last one which i was never able to play and was a huge waste of money then i'm burning down the studios
[QUOTE=Rofl_copter;49618976]why are people disagreeing with this? it's a vast period of our history that pretty much every movie and game ignores which boggles my mind
i didn't think it looked groundbreaking but at least it's doing something that actually takes place in an original setting where like 90% of human history occured
[editline]s[/editline]
and by setting i mean the very concept of hunter gatherers
[editline]e[/editline]
anything different from the million shooty shooty mcbang bang games pretending to be GRITTY and REALISTIC could be good[/QUOTE]
No one's saying that the setting isn't interesting, but that the setting is probably going to be handled poorly. See Far Cry 4: Very interesting setting bogged down by a boring and rehashed story. It's very likely this could happen again as I personally don't trust Ubisoft or the writers.
Ubisoft has a very strange way of being creative, they have great ideas (Watch Dogs, Black Flag, FC3, ect.) that they end up ruining because the play everything too safe. You can tell they give their studios a surprising amount of creative freedom (some almost having an auteur quality to them) but then you can also see where the publisher fucks over the game with their influence and restrictions.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
