• WikiLeaks: Email Claims Clinton Murdered Vince Foster(Wikileaks currently suffering DDOS attacks)
    31 replies, posted
[QUOTE]Recently discovered evidence suggests Vince Foster did not commit suicide, but died of two gunshot wounds to the neck – not the one wound initially reported. Discovered in the files of the National Archives and Records Administration, Starr’s lead prosecutor Miguel Rodriguez submitted a 2-page resignation letter and a 31 page memo about the injuries Foster sustained. Rodriguez notes in the letter details about injuries around Foster’s neck which were not reported in official government documents. At the time, the FBI claimed that Foster’s neck injury photos were underexposed, and therefore useless to them. Rodriguez claims that after he produced additinal damning evidence of a possible Foster murder coverup, he became a target and was investigated internally! In the letter, he explained twelve ways in which the case has mishandled and compromised. Then, he noted: “I steadfastly maintained, and continue to maintain, that I, at all times, conducted myself as an experienced and trained prosecutor, with years of federal prosecutorial experience and federal grand jury experience.” These records indicate Foster didn’t really die from one .38 caliber gunshot… but two gunshots! The other shot was on the right side of his neck, made by a “small caliber” bullet hole. This raises serious questions about Foster’s motives for suicide. He was tied to Hillary Clinton’s roles in White House scandals at Whitewater and the White House Travel Office.[/QUOTE] [url]http://yournewswire.com/wikileaks-clinton-murdered-vince-foster/[/url] Check the article for more evidence and links to the emails. Twitter also is under DDoss attack or atleast was when this emails started to trend on twitter. and there seems to be a media blackout regarding this [IMG]http://cdns.yournewswire.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/IMG_0832.png[/IMG] [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Terrible source, but send it to the FBI just to be sure." - rilez))[/highlight]
OK, if leak is true, that it suggests he was murdered or at least botched first suicide attempt. However, IT DOES NOT prove that Clinton was involved in a murder. This is why internet detective are fucking atrocious. They just want to do witch hunting.
The source is plane garbage. Some sites are reporting it as satire but of course most of [URL="https://www.reddit.com/domain/yournewswire.com/"]"those"[/URL] subreddits on reddit use it truthfully. First red flag is the slogan [img]http://i.imgur.com/cmlBmZE.png[/img] Second red flag if the fact that sites can't tell if it's satire or not [url]http://realorsatire.com/yournewswire-com/[/url] Third red flag is the articles they post [QUOTE=Mr. Scorpio;51324905]this website also claims that [url]http://yournewswire.com/wikileaks-bernie-sanders-plant-primaries-rigged/[/url] bernie sanders was a shill hired by the DNC to ensure hillary's victory [url]http://yournewswire.com/hillary-clinton-hired-al-qaeda-who-attacked-us-diplomats-in-benghazi/[/url] clinton hired al quaeda [url]http://yournewswire.com/former-uk-govt-science-chief-warned-of-mmr-vaccine-autism-link/[/url] and that the MMR vaccine causes autism[/QUOTE]
for fucks sake, can anyone possibly answer WHY hillary clinton who's survived hundreds of hours of house investigations, the heat of the FBI, endless partisan attacks and more would ever need to resort to murder? oh wait no they can't, never mind then.
embarassing
this website also claims that [url]http://yournewswire.com/wikileaks-bernie-sanders-plant-primaries-rigged/[/url] bernie sanders was a shill hired by the DNC to ensure hillary's victory [url]http://yournewswire.com/hillary-clinton-hired-al-qaeda-who-attacked-us-diplomats-in-benghazi/[/url] clinton hired al quaeda [url]http://yournewswire.com/former-uk-govt-science-chief-warned-of-mmr-vaccine-autism-link/[/url] and that the MMR vaccine causes autism
Can we ban this source please since it's increasingly obvious that it's satire at best?
[QUOTE=Sableye;51324894]for fucks sake, can anyone possibly answer WHY hillary clinton who's survived hundreds of hours of house investigations, the heat of the FBI, endless partisan attacks and more would ever need to resort to murder? oh wait no they can't, never mind then.[/QUOTE] [url]http://www.foxnews.com/world/2016/11/07/benghazi-guards-turned-on-us-diplomats-in-2012-attack-sources-say.amp.html?client=safari[/url] If that doesn't raise any doubts about your canditate then go ahead and vote in somebody who is above the law. You guys cant handle somebody as dumb and racist as Trump winninh fairly so you elect an cheater and symbol of all corruption in US politics. Sometimes you have to lose fairly so you it can be worth winning. [editline]7th November 2016[/editline] So you guys are just going to ignore the wikileaks emails?
[QUOTE=Jouska;51324914][URL]http://www.foxnews.com/world/2016/11/07/benghazi-guards-turned-on-us-diplomats-in-2012-attack-sources-say.amp.html?client=safari[/URL] If that doesn't raise any doubts about your canditate then go ahead and vote in somebody who is above the law.[/QUOTE] well given that politicians have diplomatic immunity(even their non-political family members have it) and special privileges, i'd say most are above the law, not just Clinton.
[QUOTE=Jouska;51324914][url]http://www.foxnews.com/world/2016/11/07/benghazi-guards-turned-on-us-diplomats-in-2012-attack-sources-say.amp.html?client=safari[/url] If that doesn't raise any doubts about your canditate then go ahead and vote in somebody who is above the law. You guys cant handle somebody as dumb and racist as Trump winninh fairly so you elect an cheater and symbol of all corruption in US politics. Sometimes you have to lose fairly so you it can be worth winning. [editline]7th November 2016[/editline] So you guys are just going to ignore the wikileaks emails?[/QUOTE] You posted a shit article in the OP, turned twitter being ddos'ed into "WikiLeaks is being ddos'ed", and now that your shit article is getting called out you just move onto another vague claim about Clinton's actions. Textbook conspiracy theorist - if one drywall is knocked down, just quickly put up another. It's basically impossible for any sane human to take seriously. The guy didn't even claim Hillary was clean, he simply questioned why the fuck Hillary would need to kill this guy. Get real.
Even if it is true, you know she's just gonna get away with it.
[QUOTE=GoDong-DK;51324967]You posted a shit article in the OP, turned twitter being ddos'ed into "WikiLeaks is being ddos'ed", and now that your shit article is getting called out you just move onto another vague claim about Clinton's actions. Textbook conspiracy theorist - if one drywall is knocked down, just quickly put up another. It's basically impossible for any sane human to take seriously. The guy didn't even claim Hillary was clean, he simply questioned why the fuck Hillary would need to kill this guy. Get real.[/QUOTE] If you actually read the article in the OP. Which you didnt. It clearly states both wikileaks and twitter has been ddosed. I'll admit that the first source is very dodgy but the articles has links to all the wikileaks emails regarding this situtation. Actually read the article.
were they really ddosed, twitter has been up all day for me
[QUOTE=Jouska;51324914][url]http://www.foxnews.com/world/2016/11/07/benghazi-guards-turned-on-us-diplomats-in-2012-attack-sources-say.amp.html?client=safari[/url] If that doesn't raise any doubts about your canditate then go ahead and vote in somebody who is above the law. You guys cant handle somebody as dumb and racist as Trump winninh fairly so you elect an cheater and symbol of all corruption in US politics. Sometimes you have to lose fairly so you it can be worth winning. [editline]7th November 2016[/editline] So you guys are just going to ignore the wikileaks emails?[/QUOTE] Mate, it's not cheating or unfair if people are voting for her. That's actually how you're supposed to win. Meanwhile, Trump is a compulsive liar, tax evader, draft dodger, and so on. But we ignore this because ???
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;51324997]were they really ddosed, twitter has been up all day for me[/QUOTE] The ddos attacks are FACTS! [url]https://www.google.com/amp/s/dailydot.relaymedia.com/amp/layer8/twitter-wikileaks-ddos-dnc-leaks/?client=ms-android-sprint-us[/url] [url]https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/twitter-down-is-it-not-working-wikileaks-ddos-us-election-japan-a7402081.html&ved=0ahUKEwianf2H4JfQAhVEOSYKHegXB3QQFghUMA0&usg=AFQjCNGfFs48kXR-V4ElzRlXsFMINtDAaA[/url] [editline]7th November 2016[/editline] [QUOTE=abcpea2;51325017]Mate, it's not cheating or unfair if people are voting for her. That's actually how you're supposed to win. Meanwhile, Trump is a compulsive liar, tax evader, draft dodger, and so on. But we ignore this because ???[/QUOTE] Ironically the tax loss credit used by Trump to avoid taxes was introduced by Clinton [url]https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/28014[/url]
[QUOTE=Jouska;51325036]The ddos attacks are FACTS! [url]https://www.google.com/amp/s/dailydot.relaymedia.com/amp/layer8/twitter-wikileaks-ddos-dnc-leaks/?client=ms-android-sprint-us[/url] [url]https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/twitter-down-is-it-not-working-wikileaks-ddos-us-election-japan-a7402081.html&ved=0ahUKEwianf2H4JfQAhVEOSYKHegXB3QQFghUMA0&usg=AFQjCNGfFs48kXR-V4ElzRlXsFMINtDAaA[/url] [editline]7th November 2016[/editline] Ironically the tax loss credit used by Trump to avoid taxes was introduced by Clinton [url]https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/28014[/url][/QUOTE]your first link has twitter saying it was unrelated to wikileaks, are you saying twitter is lying?
[QUOTE=Jouska;51325036]The ddos attacks are FACTS! [url]https://www.google.com/amp/s/dailydot.relaymedia.com/amp/layer8/twitter-wikileaks-ddos-dnc-leaks/?client=ms-android-sprint-us[/url][/QUOTE] Let's look at the first link. [media]https://twitter.com/mazdakh/status/795684646004527104[/media] Uhhhhh.....
So not only is Hillary a murderer, but the government is also hiding evidence of extra terrestrials, because everything posted in an email becomes immediately true as soon as it becomes uploaded to Wikileaks
[QUOTE=benzi2k7;51325059]your first link has twitter saying it was unrelated to wikileaks, are you saying twitter is lying?[/QUOTE] Nope i said twitter was down. Somebody says prove it and i did simple as that.
Y'know, if you're making claims based on a Wikileaks email, why not just fucking link to the Wikileaks page with email in question? Why link to some crackpot conspiracy theorist website instead?
[QUOTE=Jouska;51325091]Nope i said twitter was down. Somebody says prove it and i did simple as that.[/QUOTE]it wasn't ddos'd. it was 'due to a network routing misconfiguration during internal testing' as said by the company twitter who runs the website twitter, do you see certain keywords in a sentence and just ignore the rest or somethin?
[QUOTE=Jouska;51324987]If you actually read the article in the OP. Which you didnt. It clearly states both wikileaks and twitter has been ddosed. I'll admit that the first source is very dodgy but the articles has links to all the wikileaks emails regarding this situtation. Actually read the article.[/QUOTE] WikiLeaks seems to be up, though? Are they just doing a little ddos because...?? What's the relevance? And now I've read the whole article and it uses some random email between two guys in Texas as proof that Hillary got someone killed? Like, they mention no new evidence, but I guess the fact that two men are talking about this in a an email makes it undeniably true.
[QUOTE=Xenomoose;51325095]Y'know, if you're making claims based on a Wikileaks email, why not just fucking link to the Wikileaks page with email in question? Why link to some crackpot conspiracy theorist website instead?[/QUOTE] I didnt know if wikileaks would be an allowable source on SH. I figure this link would be okay since it leaks to the convo directly and only talks about what is said in the emails and things relating to the "suicide". Seems to me everybody here is dancing around what the emails say and making a big petty deal over some unrelevent website.
[QUOTE=Xenomoose;51325095]Y'know, if you're making claims based on a Wikileaks email, why not just fucking link to the Wikileaks page with email in question? Why link to some crackpot conspiracy theorist website instead?[/QUOTE] Because the emails are worthless without a bunch of grasping at straws.
[QUOTE=benzi2k7;51325108]it wasn't ddos'd. it was 'due to a network routing misconfiguration during internal testing' as said by the company twitter who runs the website twitter, do you see certain keywords in a sentence and just ignore the rest or somethin?[/QUOTE] No shit it wasnt ddosed. We all realized that when I posted the link claiming it wasnt. You seem to be not realize that tweet was made after the article was put up.
[QUOTE=Jouska;51325124]I didnt know if wikileaks would be an allowable source on SH. I figure this link would be okay since it leaks to the convo directly and only talks about what is said in the emails and things relating to the "suicide". Seems to me everybody here is dancing around what the emails say and making a big petty deal over some unrelevent website.[/QUOTE]probably cause it's some contextless email between two random journalists that also suggests that hillary clinton purposefully crashed a plane full of important polish people just to kill a commerce secretary [QUOTE=Jouska;51325143]No shit it wasnt ddosed. We all realized that when I posted the link claiming it wasnt. You seem to be not realize that tweet was made after the article was put up.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=Jouska;51325036]The ddos attacks are FACTS![/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=benzi2k7;51325148]probably cause it's some contextless email between two random journalists that also suggests that hillary clinton purposefully crashed a plane full of important polish people just to kill a commerce secretary[/QUOTE] I'm still not wrong at all. Look at my OP. Wikileaks email suggests clinton killed vince foster. You seem to be assuming quite a bit about me and trying to make it seems like im some sort of crazy conspiracy theorist. All i did is simple posted an fact, that there IS a leaked email that suggested clinton killed vince foster. Nothing more and nothing less. The rest of that is up to you people to form your own opinion. [editline]7th November 2016[/editline] I was referring to the wikileals ddos.
[QUOTE=GoDong-DK;51325128]Because the emails are worthless without a bunch of grasping at straws.[/QUOTE] True, they'd need some actual confirmation. Of course, nobody who has the power to verify these claims would ever actually do so, because it'd probably incriminate them, too, if they were true.
[QUOTE=Jouska;51325174]I'm still not wrong at all. Look at my OP. Wikileaks email suggests clinton killed vince foster. You seem to be assuming quite a bit about me and trying to make it seems like im some sort of crazy conspiracy theorist. All i did is simple posted an fact, that there IS a leaked email that suggested clinton killed vince foster. Nothing more and nothing less. The rest of that is up to you people to form your own opinion. [editline]7th November 2016[/editline] I was referring to the wikileals ddos.[/QUOTE]if you were referring to wikileaks ddos why did you post two articles referring to twitter being down? also like i said.. it's two random journalists making comments about a polish plane crash being orchestrated by hillary clinton & then bringing up vince foster due to him being a well known conspiracy source regarding the clintons. it would mean something if it was somehow even tangently connected to clinton's circle but it isn't, it's two random people from a batch of leaks that were released 2 years ago.
[QUOTE=Jouska;51325174]I'm still not wrong at all. Look at my OP. Wikileaks email suggests clinton killed vince foster. You seem to be assuming quite a bit about me and trying to make it seems like im some sort of crazy conspiracy theorist. All i did is simple posted an fact, that there IS a leaked email that suggested clinton killed vince foster. Nothing more and nothing less. The rest of that is up to you people to form your own opinion. [editline]7th November 2016[/editline] I was referring to the wikileals ddos.[/QUOTE] Anyone can claim anyone did anything. Because some random person claimed that Hilary Clinton killed someone doesn't make that worth even bringing up in any context.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.