• Antichrist (2009)
    22 replies, posted
[img]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ITKu_5CnS1A/TJHNLBLdHwI/AAAAAAAAAUg/4DMYisGe87I/s1600/antichrist-movie-poster.jpg[/img] This is honestly one of the slowest movies I have ever seen. Normally I'm OK with slow movies, in fact most of my favorite movies are slow (Ed Wood, Inglourious Basterds, etc); but this one just takes it to a whole new level. It's a movie about all that is evil, as the title suggests, but it just wasn't done quite right. You feel that the main female character is slowly fading into madness, which was done right, but it just seemed like it was scene after scene of pointless talking and establishing shots. It was fairly violent towards the end, which was an a pretty decent one, including one scene that made me cringe so badly that I almost looked away in which [sp] a woman cuts off her clitoris with a pair of scissors[/sp] People have described the movie as being artistic which at times, it is; but the novelty of looking at a 30 second shot of somebody in the woods of what looks like something out of "Avatar" kind of wears off quickly. It almost felt like they tried to hard. Overall, just kind of boring, I wouldn't suggest it to anyone who isn't looking for a very artsy and slow movie. [sp] NSFW though. In the first 2 minutes you see Willem Dafoe's real dick. *shudders*[/sp] 4/10
You forgot the part before the [sp] clit snipping [/sp] where she [sp] throws that rock onto William Dafoe's penis and wanks it off so it spurts blood [/sp] Very interesting.
...
This movie was pretty good except I didn't need to see [sp]WILLEM DAFOE EJACULATING BLOOD[/sp]
[QUOTE=xXDictatorXx;25794142]You forgot the part before the [sp] clit snipping [/sp] where she [sp] throws that rock onto William Dafoe's penis and wanks it off so it spurts blood [/sp] Very interesting.[/QUOTE] I'm pretty sure it was a log [editline]1st November 2010[/editline] also they used pornstars for the explicit scenes
[QUOTE=mrryanchisholm;25789853][sp] NSFW though. In the first 2 minutes you see Willem Dafoe's real dick. *shudders*[/sp][/QUOTE] Wasn't his. That was a double.
Just by reading OP this sounds like some kinky machoist scary movie.
[QUOTE=Walrus.;25794427]Just by reading OP this sounds like some kinky machoist scary movie.[/QUOTE] And how! [editline]1st November 2010[/editline] Well, sadist more like.
This is the worst film I've ever seen. Hipster shit. [editline]2nd November 2010[/editline] I liked the prologue though.
[QUOTE=LazyBoy;25794249]I'm pretty sure it was a log [editline]1st November 2010[/editline] also they used pornstars for the explicit scenes[/QUOTE] Ah well, same effect really.
I didn't like this movie at all and it seemed like the sort of movie I would like.
Saw the movie at the Edinburgh Film Festival. I thought it was fucking weird as all hell, but i still enjoyed it somewhat. It had some fucking great cinematography though. The guy who did the camera work (he won an oscar for Slumdog Millionaire) was there and told us about the film and I think also did a Q&A afterwards. He was cool.
Movie was unnecessarily graphic. Really, for what the movie was about, the sex and sexual violence was really distracting and only served to attract publicity. I did not like it.
It just seemed like "OH, YOU'RE STRESSED. LET'S HAVE SEX" every 10 minutes.
[QUOTE=scotland1;25798310]This is the worst film I've ever seen. Hipster shit. [editline]2nd November 2010[/editline] I liked the prologue though.[/QUOTE] What exactly do you mean by 'hipster shit'? I realy enjoyed this movie. And coming from someone who thinks Lars Von Trier is a terrible director, that must carry some weight. [editline]3rd November 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=mrryanchisholm;25812328]It just seemed like "OH, YOU'RE STRESSED. LET'S HAVE SEX" every 10 minutes.[/QUOTE] actually, He was trying to dissuade her from having sex all the time. Pay attention.
[QUOTE=scotland1;25798310]This is the worst film I've ever seen. Hipster shit. [editline]2nd November 2010[/editline] I liked the prologue though.[/QUOTE] This isn't close to hipster, go be uneducated somewhere else
The fuck did I just watch Facepunch? Really why did I watch this?
[QUOTE=superdinoman;25818270]The fuck did I just watch Facepunch? Really why did I watch this?[/QUOTE] 'Why did I watch this?' is the first question you ask when reviewing a film. You can follow it with 'Did I enjoy the movie?' 'What did I like?' 'What didn't I like?' 'Will I remember this movie?' 'What was the auteur trying to do?' 'How successful was he in doing it?' 'Did the film in any way exhibit "high seriousness" that is, matters of life and death, love and hate?' Answer these questions and you have basically reviewed the movie.
Shit I wanna see this now.
[QUOTE=scotland1;25798310]This is the worst film I've ever seen. Hipster shit. [/QUOTE] Anything unconventional = Hipster?
[QUOTE=Gimmmik;25818377]Shit I wanna see this now.[/QUOTE] View it if you want, that's your choice.
I thought it was a decent movie. Not great, but some parts were quite nice to watch. Not a bad soundtrack either.
I liked the start of the movie
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.