• Nick Clegg: "Children should be taught about the danger of menacing internet porn"
    55 replies, posted
[B]Sex education should include dangers of 'menacing' internet porn, Nick Clegg warns[/B]​ [URL]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2412179/Nick-Clegg-Sex-education-include-dangers-menacing-internet-porn.html[/URL]
Porn is what gets me through the day
I think kids need to know a lot of porn sites are virus traps. Also, that not everything on the internet is legal. Other than that, what's to teach? I guess you could teach them that most porn doesn't reflect real life. Like, at all.
Yes, show those impressionable young children where the porn comes from. I know that as a child, I would have loved to have that information under my belt.
The only thing about porn is how menacing it is to the health of peoples genitals on a friday night.
You can't teach the horrors of internet porn without giving kids the horrible curiosity to look it up. The only people that can keep their kids from doing that are the parents by setting up parental control and telling kids they're going to check their history. Then again you can stumble upon horrible shit by accident just by google image searching something even with safesearch on. Sex is a natural thing kids shouldn't be afraid of but internet porn is an unrestricted, horrible nightmare of depravity and bizarre, confusing and terrifying fetishes that kids need to stay the fuck away from.
I think menacing is a bit over the top, but hell, maybe things have changed since I was at school. It certainly can't hurt to teach kids the difference between porn sex and real sex, lest they fail to realise there's a difference. Similarly we need parents to be educated about porn filters offered by ISPs so we don't end up with this unjustifiable opt-out system.
But if they don't get to watch porn how are they going to know what to do later in life.
[QUOTE=Thomo_UK;42090217]But if they don't get to watch porn how are they going to know what to do later in life.[/QUOTE] Exactly. Who's going to teach them to slap the chick and call her a dirty, cock-loving whore? Who, I ask you, who???
[QUOTE=MegaJohnny;42090087]I think menacing is a bit over the top[/QUOTE] You haven't been on the internet very long then. If I were a parent then I'd start buying my kid porn mags when they become interested in women just to keep them off of that horrible internet shit.
Counter-Strike showed me my first pair of titties as a kid
[QUOTE=Twipsters;42090279]Counter-Strike showed me my first pair of titties as a kid[/QUOTE] Hey at least you weren't on a tf2 server that had an admin sharing gay tf2 porn with everyone via the motd that he could cause to pop up at any time with a new image.
[QUOTE=Twipsters;42090279]Counter-Strike showed me my first pair of titties as a kid[/QUOTE] And that just goes to show how inevitable it is. A kid could come across porn doing anything. And, honestly, I think parents should talk to them about it. Basically, all of this could be solved by unbiased, factual communication. Then again, I think most of the world's problems could be solved with that.
kids shouldn't be taught how it's menacing, they should be taught actual sexual education. teach them that porn is [I]not[/I] realistic in any manner and real sex is something to be kept under self control [editline]5th September 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=Helix Snake;42090270]You haven't been on the internet very long then. If I were a parent then I'd start buying my kid porn mags when they become interested in women just to keep them off of that horrible internet shit.[/QUOTE] don't you enjoy vore and shit like that?
[QUOTE=FlubberNugget;42090341][editline]5th September 2013[/editline] don't you enjoy vore and shit like that?[/QUOTE] Yes and that's precisely why I know what I'm talking about. I've seen shit that would make H. R. Giger look like a prude.
[QUOTE=Helix Snake;42090429]Yes and that's precisely why I know what I'm talking about.[/QUOTE] I vote Helix in charge of teaching Facepunch's sex ed classes! You could make a video series and post them in the video section!
handing yer kids porn mags won't sort out their sexual problems, only make them worse teach em about their sexuality yourself, it's the only proper way.
[QUOTE=FlubberNugget;42090457]handing yer kids porn mags won't sort out their sexual problems, only make them worse teach em about their sexuality yourself, it's the only proper way.[/QUOTE] I'd do both, naturally.
Menacing porn is the only kind I look at anymore. None of that vanilla crap for me.
There are dangers to online porn, sure, but menacing seems kind of over-the-top. There's some absolutely virus-ridden websites out there and there's some pretty fucked up porn out there but besides that, there's nothing out there that qualifies being called 'menacing'. Reading the article basically says sensible things. Porn makes boys see girls as sex objects, creates unrealistic expectations, girls might feel pressured into acting more like porn actresses. Those are real concerns but this has a bit of a 'making a mountain out of a molehill' feel to it.
"MENACING INTERNET PORN" and he hasn't even seen the stuff I like :v:
Nick Clegg must be looking at some fucked up stuff for it to be menacing
[QUOTE=Penultimate;42089945]I think kids need to know a lot of porn sites are virus traps. Also, that not everything on the internet is legal. Other than that, what's to teach? I guess you could teach them that most porn doesn't reflect real life. Like, at all.[/QUOTE] Funnily enough its found that you're more likely to get a virus from a church site then a porn site
How exactly can pornography be threatening? I picture it as porn you enjoy, starring some sexy swedish girls doing their thing and suddenly in the subtitles they'are telling you about the different ways they will murder you and sell your organs for drug money. Which I think would qualify more for surrealist modern art than porn then. This is where Clegg is going wrong, kids these days are being brought up in a dangerous age and need to be taught the dangers of surrealist modern art, and that it's porn which is preventing kids from getting into that sick filth.
[QUOTE=Pie_Tony;42090893]I picture it as porn you enjoy, starring some sexy swedish girls doing their thing and suddenly in the subtitles they'are telling you about the different ways they will murder you and sell your organs for drug money.[/QUOTE] Source?
highly related [video=youtube;9LYL1PTrtXo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9LYL1PTrtXo[/video] [quote=Ted] I’m no social scientist, and I don’t pretend to believe what John Q. Citizen thinks about this, but I’ve lived in prison for a long time now, and I’ve met a lot of men who were motivated to commit violence. Without exception, every one of them was deeply involved in pornography - deeply consumed by the addiction. The F.B.I.’s own study on serial homicide shows that the most common interest among serial killers is pornographers. It’s true.[/quote]
Oh shut up you insignificant little spec of political opportunism. No one likes you.
"Menacing" porn? How exactly is porn menacing? Is it standing on street corners wearing a hoody and drinking cheap cider or something?
Menacing porn? I'm dying. :v:
All porn must have the jaws theme as background music to qualify.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.