• Former News Of The World editor arrested in London.
    13 replies, posted
Source: [URL]http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-News/Rebekah-Brooks-Has-Been-Arrested-By-Police-Officers-Investigating-Phone-Hacking/Article/201107316032015?lpos=UK_News_Carousel_Region_0&lid=ARTICLE_16032015_Rebekah_Brooks_Has_Been_Arres ted_By_Police_Officers_Investigating_Phone_Hacking[/URL] [IMG]http://static.vg.no/uploaded/image/bilderigg/2011/07/17/1310906017614_981.jpg[/IMG] [quote]The 43-year-old went to a London police station by appointment at midday today and is being held on suspicion of conspiring to intercept communications and corruption allegations. Operation Weeting has been launched to investigate claims that newspaper journalists hacked into the phones of high-profile figures and even victims of crime. Mrs Brooks resigned as chief executive of News International (NI) on Friday. She was editor of the News Of The World (NOTW) when missing schoolgirl Milly Dowler's phone was hacked and messages were deleted. The teenager was later found murdered. Mrs Brooks is the tenth person to be arrested in connection with the NOTW scandal since detectives reopened their investigation earlier this year. A separate investigation, titled Operation Elveden, is looking at allegations of inappropriate payments to police. Mrs Brooks' PR spokesman said: "Rebekah is assisting the police with their enquiries. She attended a London police station voluntarily. [video] "It was a pre-arranged appointment. We are unable to comment further as it is an ongoing police investigation." Mrs Brooks is due to appear alongside News Corporation chairman Rupert Murdoch and his son James, who is chairman of NI, before the Culture, Media and Sport committee on Tuesday. But Mark White, home affairs correspondent, said her arrest could have implications for her appearance. "When there are some difficult questions coming her way, that gives her the opportunity perhaps not to be as candid with those questions as the committee might like her to be." Media commentator Steve Hewlett told Sky News: "The fact that she's been arrested is not entirely surprising - I don't think it should be taken to mean there is necessarily evidence pointing to her direct knowledge of the events. "But I imagine it is a matter of procedure really - that the inquiry is getting serious." Ex-NOTW political editor David Wooding has tweeted that "senior execs at News Int had no idea Rebekah was about to be arrested when she quit last week". The last ever issue of the NOTW was published on July 10 after the decision was made to close the newspaper. James Murdoch said the tabloid had been "sullied by behaviour that was wrong".[/quote]
fox news: more arrests coming soon
She as clearly no soul anyway.
Good, bitch deserves it whether she was directly responsible or simply ordered it.
Edit
She deserves that
[QUOTE=CSOD;31173327]My country is controlled by imbeciles and the world economy teeters on the brink of catastrophe, but at least I get to see Murdoch's empire crumble.[/QUOTE] This won't even scathe Murdocks empire, this will be but a minor inconvenience.
Wasn't she the one who "had nothing to do with it" and didn't want to resign? You'd think she'd just have fucked off and kept quiet.
They should arrest Murdoch himself, he's the fucking ringleader here.
[QUOTE=Disgruntled;31178471]They should arrest Murdoch himself, he's the fucking ringleader here.[/QUOTE] Just wait and see how far this goes, if they hacked 911 victims they are going to get so fucked
related: [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n1aZcsY-O8Q[/media]
You know that the police arresting her means that she doesn't have to go to the Parliamentary investigation. Now the Metropolitan police have her she can just refuse to answer any of their questions which she couldn't do were parliament questioning her. This is just showing how the met police and rupert murdoch have each others backs. Why else would the head of the met police have resigned today.
[QUOTE=Dance_Commander;31179629]You know that the police arresting her means that she doesn't have to go to the Parliamentary investigation. Now the Metropolitan police have her she can just refuse to answer any of their questions which she couldn't do were parliament questioning her. This is just showing how the met police and rupert murdoch have each others backs. Why else would the head of the met police have resigned today.[/QUOTE] Oh the conspiracies
[QUOTE=Dance_Commander;31179629]You know that the police arresting her means that she doesn't have to go to the Parliamentary investigation. Now the Metropolitan police have her she can just refuse to answer any of their questions which she couldn't do were parliament questioning her. This is just showing how the met police and rupert murdoch have each others backs. Why else would the head of the met police have resigned today.[/QUOTE] She will still have to go, but she can just sit there and say nothing in regards to this. Who knows what will happen, perhaps she will just drop the Murdoch's in it.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.