• TED Conference Exposed as Scientology-Style Cult
    11 replies, posted
[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=4JhwQ17mLjo#[/url]! I listened it just now, seems like TED is some kind of cult, they tell them what to do, like on a leesh, the talks are cheery picked, and everyone has to obey to work on that for a week, sometimes daily hours are 13-16 hours, you can't do anything else. Guests have to apply to TED, when they're accepted, they have to pay $8000 , about 2000-3000 people go. (in the video he specifically mentions scientology). Speakers also don't get paid for speaking either. For example, Bill Gates has said how vaccines can help population control(read: reduce): [url]http://www.naturalnews.com/029911_vaccines_Bill_Gates.html[/url] I found that Reddit was talking about it for days now: [url]http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/19g4vb/ted_conference_exposed/[/url] [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Not a reliable news source; you've been banned for this before." - rilez))[/highlight]
TED is a bunch of rich old men stroking their philantropic egos TEDx is where it's at
Reputable sources would be fantastic..
There are some pretty amazing TED speeches though
Is this a joke?
[QUOTE=Bradyns;39817664]Reputable sources would be fantastic..[/QUOTE] What is your definition of reputable source? Does it have to be official-looking with a suit an tie to be more believable? Look, the 3rd-party sources are VERY scarce because simply nobody covers things like this, the source is [url]http://joerogan.net/[/url] , but it's long podcast and on the youtube it's just an excerpt so it can be used for actually using it as news articles, so it had to be edited re-uploaded on youtube. Just because CNN or "insert random rupert murdoch media organisation" isn't reporting about it makes it less trustworthy? Thank you for your understanding.
[QUOTE=Stewox;39817692]What is your definition of reputable source? Does it have to be official-looking with a suit an tie to be more believable?[/QUOTE] Yes.
Hah, ohh wow. Natural News? Its been a while since I saw that crackpot site. And Reddit's conspiracy section? And a Youtube video? Is it April Fool's Day already?
[QUOTE=Stewox;39817692]What is your definition of reputable source? Does it have to be official-looking with a suit an tie to be more believable?[/QUOTE] It has to be something other than a reddit subforum and a site that's featured on Infowars.
[QUOTE=Stewox;39817692]What is your definition of reputable source? Does it have to be official-looking with a suit an tie to be more believable?[/QUOTE] From the BBC or Rueters would be nice. Some fucking podcast and r/conspiracy (fucking really mate?) are not valid sources you tit.
Probably from an organization that is not known for being overly sensationalist and bending the truth as they choose.
[QUOTE=zombojoe;39817706]Probably from an organization that is not known for being overly sensationalist and bending the truth as they choose.[/QUOTE]Natural News commonly just makes up articles. Not even "bending" but straight up fabricating.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.