Purging non believers - Polidicks

*This was taken from [url]http://www.thebritishresistance.co.uk*[/url] Under the new Stalinism which, in true Orwelian style, our leaders persist in assuming us is a free society, it is not just political affiliation to a nationalist party such as the BNP, which can lose you your job and means of supporting your family. The use of an unwisely chosen word or the expression of a non-compliant opinion can result in an individual being instantly purged and cast into the ranks of the unemployed. A recent article by Tim Heydon detailed the actions taken against those in academia, who have dared to contradict the current, rigidly enforced, orthodoxies and lies being taught to our young as facts. (Including, of course, Dr. Frank Ellis who occasionally contributes his work to this site.) Similar purges take place across society and within the entertainment industry, Andy Gray, for instance was secretly taped in a private, off air, conversation and paid for his politically incorrect views with his job and reputation. Meanwhile ITV have announced that Brian True May the producer of Midsummer Murders will be "stepping down" from his position following politically naïve revelations made in an interview with Radio Times. Readers will recall that Mr. True-May admitted that the programe avoided casting ethnic minorities as residents of the fictional village of Midsummer, in order to maintain the “quintessential Englishness” which the series' viewers so enjoy. Naturally such blasphemy led to Mr. True-May's immediate suspension, and, as announced by ITV his subsequent purging. True-May's punishment will not end here. We can be sure that in the same way as those who offended their rulers behind the old iron curtain where banished from their chosen professions, Brian True-May will never work, or even be permitted to socialise, within the entertainment industry in this country again. Let us hope he has made enough money in his career to date to cushion his landing in the outer-darkness. It seems that not much has changed behind what was once the old iron curtain either. Reuters are reporting the fate of Konstantin Poltoranin, the Russian Federal Migration Service's chief spokesman. During an interview with the BBC Russian Service, Mr Poltoranin stated that he could not understand why Europe imported so many immigrants from Africa and the Middle East, adding that Russia needed to more cautious about "mixing bloods," as “the future of the white race was at stake”. Poltoranin, who had been in his job since 2005, was, of course, unemployed within hours of voicing the truth which date not speak its name. According to Reuters: The head of the Federal Migration Service, Konstantin Romadanovsky, called the comments "unacceptable" and confirmed they had cost the spokesman his job, the state-run Itar-tass news agency reported. The Kremlin added Poltoranin's interview had raised a red flag at the presidential administration and his sacking was a "logical and necessary step," a spokesman said. (full report here) Brian True-May and Konstantin Romadanovsky by failing to embrace enforced multiculturalism with the fervour of a teen-aged girl screaming at a boy band, were both guilty of one of the ultimate sins of the modern world. True-May sought only to preserve an illusion of homogeneous whiteness in a tiny, fictional corner of a once white land, for this he was suspended, pilloried in the press, and swiftly forced out of the profession in which he had spent his working life. No doubt he will be ostracised by his one time colleagues and peers, none of them wishing to have their own reputations sullied by association or, indeed, their abject submission to the cult questioned by their masters. By caring for the reality of the white race and for its very survival Romadanovsky was, of course, guilty of the greater crime, and the entire weight of the Russian state descended upon him. Yes, that was Russia, but does anyone imagine an official would survive making such a statement in Britain, France, Germany or anywhere in the West. Could a line which would trip without consequence from non-white lips if applied to any other race, be spoken publicly by a white man, about his own, anywhere, and that white man that man retain his job? Reuters automatically labels the unfortunate Mr. Romandanovsky a racist, for that is where we have been brought. To be a racist on the 21st Century, it is no longer necessary to hate anyone, you can be destroyed for merely loving that which you are no longer permitted to love. In the modern world when it comes to the subject of race the only permissible position for a white person, who is not actively seeking the destruction of their own race, to take is to be entirely indifferent to as whether or not our people survive. We are required to embrace, applaud and encourage our own destruction, or look the other way whilst we die. For to resist in any way is racist, to care at all is racist, and to love your own people is racism of the first order. Racists must be destroyed, they must be purged, and it is for those in power to determine and redefine what racism is. Ever louder come the calls to ban those who do not think in the permitted way, they cannot join the police, they should not teach, they may not worship in our churches, and, as we have seen, those who fail to recite the mantra will lose their jobs. How does this differ from what went on behind the iron curtain, or what goes on now in the darkest and dirtiest dictatorships of the third world? For some, their very liberty is at risk, as I write people languish in jail for the crime of writing words, meanwhile, in Carlisle earlier this week an ex-soldier, Andrew Ryan, was sentenced to 70 days in prison for burning paper (a Koran) such a sentence would be unthinkable had a Muslim burnt a bible - imagine the outcry. For seventy years in Europe mere words could destroy a man's life, he and all around him could be purged, banished, imprisoned, or worse, for the thoughts within his head. Then a wall came down and they told us we were free. But what has really changed? We are not free. We do not live in free societies. How can we be free if we can still be condemned for our thoughts and punished for our words? [highlight](User was banned for this post ("not news" - GunFox))[/highlight]

Yes master, we shall follow you the the other side.

I sense a slight hint of bias. . .

[QUOTE=lulzbocksV2;29343494]Yes master, we shall follow you the the other side.[/QUOTE] Have you even read it?

This... isn't news.

[QUOTE=DudeGuyKT;29343500]I sense a slight hint of bias. . .[/QUOTE] It is way more truthful and to the point than the current crap we have. [editline]22nd April 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Elizer;29343644]This... isn't news.[/QUOTE] It is and it isn't If you notice and are disgusted at how the BBC twist words and make you seem like someone you're not then you would agree with the article.

[QUOTE=Georgeman;29343569]Have you even read it?[/QUOTE] I tried to but your post isn't in English. It's some sorta of pseudo-language which only sorta looks like English. [QUOTE=Georgeman;29343569]Under the new Stalinism which, in true Orwelian style, our leaders persist in assuming us is a free society, it is not just political affiliation to a nationalist party such as the BNP, which can lose you your job and means of supporting your family.[/QUOTE] For example: what does this sentence mean? Like I understand each individual word, but they aren't parsed to form a coherent sentence.

[QUOTE=Georgeman;29343646]It is way more truthful and to the point than the current crap we have. [editline]22nd April 2011[/editline] It is and it isn't If you notice and are disgusted at how the BBC twist words and make you seem like someone you're not then you would agree with the article.[/QUOTE] No, I mean that it isn't news. It's an editorial type piece.

I just copied and pasted it, never sorted out the layout of it, what do you mean this is not in English? This is English English.

[QUOTE=Elizer;29343683]No, I mean that it isn't news. It's an editorial type piece.[/QUOTE] Plus it's a white nationalist piece which definitely aren't kosher on these forums

If the white race is somehow destroying itself by allowing itself to mix with other races, then does that not make it inferior and should we not thank natural selection for yet again cleansing the gene pool?

[QUOTE=Georgeman;29343701]I just copied and pasted it, never sorted out the layout of it, what do you mean this is not in English? This is English English.[/QUOTE] I mean it's poorly written to the point where it is difficult to understand what it is saying. It's like a 4th grader wrote it. Racial nationalism isn't allowed here.

Or should we only thank natural selection when it works to our benefit

[QUOTE=Elizer;29343683]No, I mean that it isn't news. It's an editorial type piece.[/QUOTE] Yes, well this is a Non-Partisan group, meaning they are Nationalistic but are not aligned to any party (They used to, but thanks to the dodgy leadership of the BNP and utter stupidity that changed (Pat Harringtion known IRA Sympathiser and defended the killing of babies)) [editline]22nd April 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=SigmaLambda;29343706]Plus it's a white nationalist piece which definitely aren't kosher on these forums[/QUOTE] It is a British Nationalist piece, defending the people. [editline]22nd April 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=SigmaLambda;29343722]I mean it's poorly written to the point where it is difficult to understand what it is saying. It's like a 4th grader wrote it. Racial nationalism isn't allowed here.[/QUOTE] There is no 'professional' writers on the BR, it is all collective meaning the community writes a article, if it passes Moderation it goes through.

[QUOTE=Georgeman;29343732] It is a British Nationalist piece, defending the people.[/QUOTE] hey [quote]True-May sought only to preserve an illusion of homogeneous whiteness in a tiny, fictional corner of a once white land, for this he was suspended, pilloried in the press, and swiftly forced out of the profession in which he had spent his working life. No doubt he will be ostracised by his one time colleagues and peers, none of them wishing to have their own reputations sullied by association or, indeed, their abject submission to the cult questioned by their masters. By caring for the reality of the white race and for its very survival Romadanovsky was, of course, guilty of the greater crime, and the entire weight of the Russian state descended upon him.[/quote] It's white nationalism.

[QUOTE=ThePuska;29343707]If the white race is somehow destroying itself by allowing itself to mix with other races, then does that not make it inferior and should we not thank natural selection for yet again cleansing the gene pool?[/QUOTE] White (Caucasian) is rapidly becoming a minority, naught but 100 years ago it was at roughly 18% now it is about 5-4%

[QUOTE=Georgeman;29343732] There is no 'professional' writers on the BR, it is all collective meaning the community writes a article, if it passes Moderation it goes through.[/QUOTE] You don't have to be a professional writer to know the basics of grammar and syntax. [QUOTE=Georgeman;29343798]White (Caucasian) is rapidly becoming a minority, naught but 100 years ago it was at roughly 18% now it is about 5-4%[/QUOTE] that's just because non-majority-white countries like India and China are increasing in population as their relative prosperity increases.

[QUOTE=SigmaLambda;29343792]hey It's white nationalism.[/QUOTE] Whats wrong with that?

What is this bullshit? This is not the nationalism I like.

[QUOTE=Georgeman;29343805]Whats wrong with that?[/QUOTE] Well first off racial nationalism is racism which is not allowed on these forums. (And don't give me the schtick about how "we're not racist, we just want to protect our own race" because no one falls for that)

[QUOTE=SigmaLambda;29343804]You don't have to be a professional writer to know the basics of grammar and syntax. that's just because non-majority-white countries like India and China are increasing in population as their relative prosperity increases.[/QUOTE] Do you know the Immigration policies of places like India, Mexico etc.. [editline]22nd April 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Sobotnik;29343831]What is this bullshit? This is not the nationalism I like.[/QUOTE] This is Reality of the world.

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;29343831]What is this bullshit? This is not the nationalism I like.[/QUOTE] yeah i like an fractionally less inane version of nationalism. what gives?

[QUOTE=Sobotnik;29343831]What is this bullshit? This is not the nationalism I like.[/QUOTE] It is also not Bull, it is fact. [editline]22nd April 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=SigmaLambda;29343833]Well first off racial nationalism is racism which is not allowed on these forums. (And don't give me the schtick about how "we're not racist, we just want to protect our own race" because no one falls for that)[/QUOTE] So you won't even listen? So whose the Ignorant one?

[QUOTE=Georgeman;29343837]Do you know the Immigration policies of places like India, Mexico etc..[/QUOTE] india and mexico are different countries so they probably have different policies than the UK i bet you're going to use their policies to justify some anti-immigrant sentiment [QUOTE=Georgeman;29343863] So you won't even listen? So whose the Ignorant one?[/QUOTE] I've listened to their rhetoric and it is all 100 percent crap and you've fallen for it.

It's like the British Glaber.

[QUOTE=SigmaLambda;29343878]india and mexico are different countries so they probably have different policies than the UK i bet you're going to use their policies to justify some anti-immigrant sentiment[/QUOTE] To own anything in Mexico and India (I.E house, claim benefits, own the house you live in etc...) you have to be Ethnically Indian or Mexican.