• Richard Dawkins interviews Wendy Wright
    117 replies, posted
Warning: Contains Copious amounts of Rage Material There are 7 parts, each equally as rageworthy as the last, but if you can make it past the first, well done. [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFjoEgYOgRo[/media] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ggwu5sWU0Mo[/media] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wsaa3RxjTWA[/media] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDjINoP0OE0[/media] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zr5mBuZZhis[/media] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vw8p3dScu0U[/media] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMCsMesoWiw[/media]
Does she even know what she's talking about with "evidence of evolution from one species to another?" Does she want scientists to show her a cat one week, then videotape it as it turns into a frog by the next week? The evidence is in the DNA and similarities, as Dawkins tells her over and over again. So much rage at this video.
It's so hard to watch this
I stopped listening at around 3:34. She has no idea of what she's talking about just like the rest. If you want to make an argument, actually educate yourself first about the topic and just don't pull shit off the top of your head.
A "Kree-Aye-Tore".
"Won't even allow discussion" UH UH No? They WERE discussing it. Was she seriously trying to disprove the conversation DURING the conversation? Also, re: "WHY CAN'T I SCIENCE WITHOUT KNOWING SCIENCE?" [quote] It's almost like neurosurgeons are creating a CLOSED CIRCLE. Why is it that only NEUROSURGEONS can do neurosurgery?! It's almost like they're trying to protect the fact that neurosurgery is a lie![/quote] [editline][/editline] I think her definition of objectivity is: "Does the evidence presented support, or can be interpreted to support, my wild claims, y/n: If y -> grasp onto it and use it in every argument ever If n -> ignore the argument; apply ad hominem; question your now MORTAL ENEMY's motives; ignore all opposing facts"
Yes, but where is the evidence?
What a fucking bitch. I've met people like her. All of them need to be tossed in a lake of fire. While covered in petrol. In an iron maiden. [editline]05:57AM[/editline] They smile and talk while calling you a close minded satanist who doesn't value human life. They need a fist to the face and a kick to the cunt.
[QUOTE=Mr. Scorpio;24994718]What a fucking bitch. I've met people like her. All of them need to be tossed in a lake of fire. While covered in petrol. In an iron maiden. [editline]05:57AM[/editline] They smile and talk while calling you a close minded satanist who doesn't value human life. They need a fist to the face and a kick to the cunt.[/QUOTE] It's tunnel vision, pure and simple. I've heard the words God and uh so many times that I think I've gone deaf.
kill her fucking dead kill her fucking dead with a baseball bat [editline]06:02AM[/editline] [QUOTE=RichardCQ;24994772]It's tunnel vision, pure and simple. I've heard the words God and uh so many times that I think I've gone deaf.[/QUOTE] it's not tunnel vision, it's just mind shattering stupidity. She is literally incapable of comprehending the ideas presented to her.
[QUOTE=Mr. Scorpio;24994776]kill her fucking dead kill her fucking dead with a baseball bat [editline]06:02AM[/editline] it's not tunnel vision, it's just mind shattering stupidity. She is literally incapable of comprehending the ideas presented to her.[/QUOTE] When afflicted with tunnel vision, you're literally incapable of seeing past the 'tunnel walls' so to speak. But, I think the real moral of this video is that Darwin has massive titanium testicles to be mentally assaulted by this particularly blond parrot. [editline][/editline] Does she believe that there's like a science czar in a floating pyramid or something that controls how scientists are supposed to examine the natural universe? [editline][/editline] I liked how Darwin reacted to her recessive gene conversation. "And both parents who have brown eyes get a child with blue eyes because there's just enough genetic material for it to present" "...and that's evidence AGAINST evolution?"
I got about three videos in, then everything she said seemed to start blurring into itself.
[QUOTE=MalkSticks;24994867]I got about three videos in, then everything she said seemed to start blurring into itself.[/QUOTE] Her answers are a fractal representation of complete and total ignorance. Also, confusing conscience (with a flair at the end) with conscious is a derp move. [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35TbGjt-weA[/media] [editline][/editline] THEY'RE USING THEIR CRITICAL FACTORIES!
50 seconds in FFFFFFFFFFFFF
I watched this whole thing a couple night ago. Soooo fucking hard to watch. "We don't think evolution is right because there's no evidenceeeeeeeeeee" *Dawkins gives a fuckload of evidence* ".......but wheres' the evidenceeeeeeeeeeee??"
How to win an argument: 1. Make stupid claims 2. Take the moral High ground 3. Laugh Smugly 4. Ignore Rebuttals. 5. Evade hard questions.
These videos in a nutshell - Dawkins - "But there is evidence, go look at it." Bitch - "But what I go back to is..."
It shits me how she pretends to be all smiles, giggles and sunshine but she's actually being incredibly rude and condescending. People like this are brainwashed beyond repair. I also hate how she is saying that Evolution is negative, just because she can't handle the truth that she's not living in a perfect world where she is infinitely right.
Ignorantly adamant.
I haven't watched the whole thing, not enough time, only managed 4 parts and I will continue later. For now I'll say Richard is a champ for having the patience to talk with her, some of her views are super ignorant.
HAHAHAHAHAHA I died at the end 6th vid hahahaha holy shit -If evolution was real there would be massive evidence. -There is. -heh heh heh heh -*explains about fish coming out of the water and reptilians jaw bones* -So what is your cause in life?
"Seriously, there isn't a controversy." Oh my god Dawkins I love you. [editline]12:37PM[/editline] "Scientists are claiming they're the only ones who can speak on this issue" Well they're not but they're certainly the only ones qualified to [editline]12:41PM[/editline] AD HOMINEM Homin[b]EM[/b]
You are not going to beat Dawkins in an argument over evolution. Evolution is not something you can or can't believe in. It is fact. Its like denying the existence of electricity and calling it gods magical energy.
Jesus tittyfucking christ I am not rage prone but oh my god. When he's trying to explain Australopithecus and Homo Habilus and such and she just keeps dodging the question... URRrrurururgghhhhh
I fucking love Dawkins. I wish that people on this topic that are against evolution weren't so busy trying to defend their views and beliefs and would actually sit down and listen to what scientists are trying to say.
The stupidity, it hurts so much. Seriously, the woman is so blind towards science.
[img_thumb]http://images.memegenerator.net/Wendy-Wright/ImageMacro/2729230/Evidence-Evidenceeeeee.jpg[/img_thumb] Loved the part were Dawkins asked her about her childhood. The stupidity hurts so much!
oh god the camera work [editline]08:43PM[/editline] why are they standing up? [editline]08:43PM[/editline] oh jesus too hard to watch this
this stupid fucking waste of cunt, first you say you have no alternative motives beyond science, and then you say evolution is bad because it's morally degenerate YOU ARE A FUCKING BRICK WALL, A BRICK WALL MADE OF STUPID.
This is making me fall in love with Richard Dawkins. "Long description of my point of view" "Wow, you have no idea what you're talking about." That's basically how the whole thing goes.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.