• Possible MH370 debris spotted in southern Indian Ocean
    54 replies, posted
[url]http://twitpic.com/dyt5pz[/url] [img]http://imgkk.com/i/rcr2.jpg[/img] [url]http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-26659583[/url] [quote]04:07: In his statement, Mr Abbott said: "I would like to inform the House that new and credible information has come to light in relation to the search for Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 in the southern Indian Ocean. The Australian Maritime Safety Authority has received information based on satellite imagery of objects possibly related to the search. Following specialist analysis of this satellite imagery, two possible objects related to the search have been identified." 04:04: Mr Abbott told parliament in Canberra that a search aircraft had been diverted to try to locate the objects in the southern Indian Ocean.[/quote] [url]http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-26659951[/url] [quote]Two objects have been seen that could possibly relate to the missing Malaysia Airlines plane, Australian PM Tony Abbott has announced. Australian vessels have been searching in the southern Indian Ocean for the aircraft, which disappeared on 8 March with 239 people on board. Mr Abbott said the objects had been identified on satellite imagery. An Orion aircraft had been sent to the area to try to locate the objects, Mr Abbott told parliament.[/quote] [url]https://twitter.com/BBCBreaking/status/446507111858843648[/url] [img]http://imgkk.com/i/vyfk.png[/img] [url]https://twitter.com/WilliamsJon/status/446508093091119104[/url] [img]http://puu.sh/7ChQ3.png[/img]
I've been saying it was nose dived into the ocean but no one believes me.
One search plane currently at the location, three more on the way. Described as the best lead in the entire search so far
[B]If this happens to be the plane[/B], this mystery just stepped up to a higher level. It is [B]very[/B] [B]possible[/B] this derby is not from the plane.
It's probably just a couple weather balloons
As long as Courteney Love isn't right, I'm fine. But I will be a bit relieved once this plane is found and once they find the recorder and find out what the heck happened.
If that happens to be the debris, the whole thing gets more complex. Flying southwest just to crash it into the ocean seems a bit odd.
[QUOTE=kman866;44296318]If that happens to be the debris, the whole thing gets more complex. Flying southwest just to crash it into the ocean seems a bit odd.[/QUOTE] If the plane was hijacked (which seems probable here), it could have been brought down by retaliating passengers, similar to Flight 93.
[QUOTE=racerfan;44296376]If the plane was hijacked (which seems probable here), it could have been brought down by retaliating passengers, similar to Flight 93.[/QUOTE] Haven't heard anything that implies hijacking beyond the fact that two Iranians were on board, and them arabs can't fly no plane without hijacking it, clearly.
[QUOTE=racerfan;44296376]If the plane was hijacked (which seems probable here), it could have been brought down by retaliating passengers, similar to Flight 93.[/QUOTE] If that were true and it was hijacked, where the hell were they taking the plane?
[QUOTE=SPESSMEHREN;44296437]If that were true and it was hijacked, where the hell were they taking the plane?[/QUOTE] Antarctica.
this is truly a weird case.
[QUOTE=Riller;44296391]Haven't heard anything that implies hijacking beyond the fact that two Iranians were on board, and them arabs can't fly no plane without hijacking it, clearly.[/QUOTE] There's been suggestions that the pilots may have hijacked it, given the technical skill one would need to disappear a 777. All just conjecture at the moment, but it was enough for authorities to raid the pilots homes and confiscate computers and a pilots flight simulator.
[QUOTE=>VLN<;44296208][B]If this happens to be the plane[/B], this mystery just stepped up to a higher level. It is [B]very[/B] [B]possible[/B] this derby is not from the plane.[/QUOTE] derby = horse race debris = rubble, wreckage, ruins, etc. :v:
[QUOTE=OvB;44296531]There's been suggestions that the pilots may have hijacked it, given the technical skill one would need to disappear a 777. All just conjecture at the moment, but it was enough for authorities to raid the pilots homes and confiscate computers and a pilots flight simulator.[/QUOTE] I dont see how its a big deal that one of the pilots had a flight simulator. Thats not suspicious nor should be relevant to this case at all. He had over 15,000 hours of flight time, most of which being in the 777. All they're going to find is that the pilot liked flying so much that he wasted more time sitting in his ass flying in FSX
best theory I've heard so far was that there was an electrical fire that cut the systems off in the sequence we see, it also would have taken out plane phones and incapacitated the passengers, the pilots were turning back towards a runway which is on the path that the plane turned onto, and they were also incapacitated and asphixiated and the plane kept flying till the autopilot died . sure as hell beats this crazy hijackd and hidden theory [editline]20th March 2014[/editline] idk it just seems from everything here that there was some very sudden catastrophe that cut off communications, and the pilots were able to turn around but then it got worse and they crashed, hijacking just doesn't seem to fit in this case, we have no evidence from any of the passengers, no communications from the passengers, no codes from anyone really, and just conjecture from fox and CNN who are whipping up 9-11 paranoia for ratings
[QUOTE=Sableye;44296722]best theory I've heard so far was that there was an electrical fire that cut the systems off in the sequence we see, it also would have taken out plane phones and incapacitated the passengers, the pilots were turning back towards a runway which is on the path that the plane turned onto, and they were also incapacitated and asphixiated and the plane kept flying till the autopilot died . sure as hell beats this crazy hijackd and hidden theory [editline]20th March 2014[/editline] idk it just seems from everything here that there was some very sudden catastrophe that cut off communications, and the pilots were able to turn around but then it got worse and they crashed, hijacking just doesn't seem to fit in this case, we have no evidence from any of the passengers, no communications from the passengers, no codes from anyone really, and just conjecture from fox and CNN who are whipping up 9-11 paranoia for ratings[/QUOTE] There's always that guy in the other thread who suggested that a meteor came down and slam-dunked the plane into the ocean. I mean, if [I]that[/I] happened, then there could be an oxygen mask lying somewhere in Quebec for all we know!
[QUOTE=Riller;44296391]Haven't heard anything that implies hijacking beyond the fact that two Iranians were on board, and them arabs can't fly no plane without hijacking it, clearly.[/QUOTE] The sudden course change might indicate a hijacking. Since there's little information at the moment, something else entirely might have caused it, but hijacking is one of the possible theories for this so far
So who investigates it now if it crashed outside Australia? Us or the NTSB/Malaysian Safety board?
Typically its the county which the crash occurred (not in Aus territory, so not Australia), the country of vessel (Malaysia) and the country of the planes origin offers to help (so the US / NTSB).
[QUOTE=racerfan;44296873]The sudden course change might indicate a hijacking. Since there's little information at the moment, something else entirely might have caused it, but hijacking is one of the possible theories for this so far[/QUOTE] If you were going to hijack a plane for the purpose of terrorism, why would you do it in the middle of the fucking ocean? Why would they not wait a couple hours till they're on land, near an actual target? And unless the hijacker(s) really knew what they were doing, the transponder wouldn't have cut out.
[QUOTE=SPESSMEHREN;44296437]If that were true and it was hijacked, where the hell were they taking the plane?[/QUOTE] Atlantis.
[QUOTE=Morbo!!!;44297244]If you were going to hijack a plane for the purpose of terrorism, why would you do it in the middle of the fucking ocean? Why would they not wait a couple hours till they're on land, near an actual target? And unless the hijacker(s) really knew what they were doing, the transponder wouldn't have cut out.[/QUOTE]If you don't want to use it at that moment? Take the plane off the map, hide it away, and prepare it for a different attack. Then the can bog the thing down with whatever you want and truly weaponize it.
That image looked like a regular wave to me
[QUOTE=Doctor Zedacon;44297308]If you don't want to use it at that moment? Take the plane off the map, hide it away, and prepare it for a different attack. Then the can bog the thing down with whatever you want and truly weaponize it.[/QUOTE] That would assume 1: The hijackers know how to land, 2: They have somewhere to land within range and 3: Know how to disable the communication systems. Why doesn't it surprise me that the second there's a mystery surrounding the disappearance of an airliner, it's mostly Americans who jump to the conclusion of a hijacking.
They didn't perchance find it near a lighthouse, did they?
Looks like a distance where a plane would run out of fuel.
In my class we voted on what caused it to dissapear, I put forth Cthulhu, and it was almost unanimously supported. ps: before you say I'm an ass this was like, right when it went missing, where your guess was as good as mine.
I always thought it looked like a hijacking. The electrical fire theory is an option but it just strikes me as an unusual state of flight to occur at. [editline]20th March 2014[/editline] [QUOTE=Morbo!!!;44297244]If you were going to hijack a plane for the purpose of terrorism, why would you do it in the middle of the fucking ocean? Why would they not wait a couple hours till they're on land, near an actual target? And unless the hijacker(s) really knew what they were doing, the transponder wouldn't have cut out.[/QUOTE] Transponder off, the plane is invisible over the ocean. If you're stealing it as a weapon, you don't want anyone to know where you're taking it, now do you?
[QUOTE=teh pirate;44298246]I always thought it looked like a hijacking. The electrical fire theory is an option but it just strikes me as an unusual state of flight to occur at.[/QUOTE] Fires can start at any time, its not like the pilot turns on an ok to start fire sign on takeoff or landing.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.