"1 week early for PS3"
What platform did the Battlefield series start on?
...oh... right, the PC. Thanks for sticking with us
[QUOTE=CanadianBill;35116926]"1 week early for PS3"
What platform did the Battlefield series start on?
...oh... right, the PC. Thanks for sticking with us[/QUOTE]It's some kind of contract between EA and Sony.
What was with the glock? They put some bullshit desert eagle stock sounds on it in the video.
didnt dice say some shit about battlefield 3 being the spotlight for pc and how they'll put all their attention on us or something?
good job sticking to that dice
whoa one week for the ps3, im shitting my pants so hard :)))))
also l86a1 yes
It looks okay but I wouldn't pay more than $10 for it.
[editline]13th March 2012[/editline]
Oh nevermind, Spas 12, TAKE ALL MY MONEY.
Ew
Not fitting the feel of Battlefield
Reminds me too much of Call of Duty
my PC is going to explode from all those graphical details of destruction
Eh. I've been wanting new maps for BF3 but I'm not sure if I want to get these. Looks like a bigger clusterfuck than 64 player Operation Metro.
I think I may pass on this, I want more large maps with lots of vehicles, not more CQB maps. (I know about the armored DLC coming.)
They better allow us to fly on the outside in a helicopter
That's exactly what BF3 needs. More Call of Duty!
I'd like to see a couple BF 1942 maps ported over like Karkand was, aside from Wake. Maybe a couple Vietnam maps as well. Call it the Nostalgia DLC
[QUOTE=Jmir 54;35117193]They better allow us to fly on the outside in a helicopter[/QUOTE]
Fuck that, I wanna fly inside
I have never played a Battlefield game in my entire life and I can tell that it looks more like COD then BF.
Not necessarily a bad thing, it could look like CoD, but play better.
Guys this isn't that bad.
They specifically said the first new DLC will be infantry oriented closer quarters maps and weapons to go along with it.
Then the next DLC will be all the large maps with new vehicles etc
I can't wait to play this map with 64 players.
It's 16 actually.
i saw a L86A1 :D!!
[QUOTE=masterchief6;35117484]i saw a L85A1 :D!![/QUOTE]
My innocence.
The Armoured Kill DLC needs to be conquest but with A-10s and Su-25s. I'm kind of tired of only fighter jets on Conquest maps. Hell they should just go all out and bring in every vehicle from both Conquest and Rush maps.
[QUOTE=CanadianBill;35116926]"1 week early for PS3"
What platform did the Battlefield series start on?
...oh... right, the PC. Thanks for sticking with us[/QUOTE]
Isn't this part of because they promised PS3 players with a copy of a game but didn't live up to their words and now they have to be more exclusive to them.
DLC should be renamed to usas frag tower.
If it's not 64 players then I won't touch it.
[QUOTE=ZestyLemons;35117803]If it's not 64 players then I won't touch it.[/QUOTE]
Apparently it's only 16 players, though even if it's 64 would you really want 64 players in a very small map like this? at least there are smart people in this thread realizing this is dumb and not like the News Node thread where it was "omg if u want big maps go play bf2 or something" or "be happy they are making DLC at all"
[QUOTE=minilandstan;35117436]I can't wait to play this map with 64 players.[/QUOTE]
No bullets, only explosives. CQB maps are forever destined to be nothing more than grenade spam
Reminds me of a certain CoD map.
I think it would've been better if it was a cargo ship instead of a skyscraper.
This should be fun regardless. This is not like CoD despite what people are saying, this game isn't riddled with flawed game mechanics, shitty respawning systems, and horrible hit detection. I always found myself at a HUGE disadvantage in really open maps like caspian and would always hang around buildings hoping to catch a few people off guard.
Tell me they're not charging for this...
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
