Listening to. People isn't. Fun when they. Add a handful. Of periods. To each sentence.
[QUOTE=X-tra;48692335]What if you pick "not far" though.[/QUOTE]
Tested, you enter a room where you fall to your death with the word "WOW" spelled out in coins.
still weirds me out seeing people post videos of this guy when i went to school with him fucking ages ago lol.
Mario Maker is awakening people's deepest creative desires.
[video=youtube;7pX1YiT6UdA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pX1YiT6UdA[/video]
[QUOTE=Pako;48693582]Mario Maker is awakening people's deepest creative desires.
[video=youtube;7pX1YiT6UdA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pX1YiT6UdA[/video][/QUOTE]
Vinny played that on stream. That was fucking hilarious but somewhat dark
[media]https://youtu.be/f1q-lUJB51o?t=1554[/media] @ 25:50 minutes in
It bugs me how much i want to play Mario Maker. I thought it was a simple editor but i have seen some shit on Reddit that makes me think you can make some really incredible levels.
Wii U is still not worth it for me, perhaps the open world Zelda game will fix that.
[QUOTE=darth-veger;48693780]
Wii U is still not worth it for me, perhaps the open world Zelda game will fix that.[/QUOTE]
I bought mine last Friday, picked up Maker, MK8, and 3D World came with the bundle. I haven't put it down yet, haven't even touched Mario Kart.
[QUOTE=wauterboi;48692585]Listening to. People isn't. Fun when they. Add a handful. Of periods. To each sentence.[/QUOTE]
Christopher Walken would like to have a word with you.
Oh christ that Indigo Prophecy reference :v:
[QUOTE=BusinessRed;48709893]Christopher Walken would like to have a word with you.[/QUOTE]
I was thinking more Shatner
[quote]This video contains content from CondeNast, who has blocked it on copyright grounds.[/quote]
Are you fucking kidding me? I looked up who these guys were and they own Ars Technica, [URL="http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2015/09/jump-the-void-confronting-existential-dread-through-super-mario-maker/"]who posted their own video of this level[/URL]. So they've taken down the original video of this level, made by the creator, because one of their publications made a video about the level.
YouTube is the fucking worst. Why even bother posting anything on it anymore?
[editline]asdf[/editline]
Nevermind, seems he got it back already. Still amazing what lengths some companies will go to with copyright claims.
[QUOTE=Shugo;48722482]Are you fucking kidding me? I looked up who these guys were and they own Ars Technica, [URL="http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2015/09/jump-the-void-confronting-existential-dread-through-super-mario-maker/"]who posted their own video of this level[/URL]. So they've taken down the original video of this level, made by the creator, because one of their publications made a video about the level.
YouTube is the fucking worst. Why even bother posting anything on it anymore?
[editline]asdf[/editline]
Nevermind, seems he got it back already. Still amazing what lengths some companies will go to with copyright claims.[/QUOTE]
YouTube tends to make automated takedowns and then attribute it on the companies on whose behalf they did the takedown.
In my case, I uploaded a gameplay clip of Brawl being played on Dolphin, a Wii emulator. It was taken down a few years later because apparently one scene of the clip matched some Youtube partner's footage of the same game. I contacted him, he had no idea my video was taken down, but he could cancel the automated takedown and bring my video back online, which he did.
What a brilliant system.
[B]EDIT:[/B]
Whoops, it wasn't actually taken down but a copyright claim was put on it preventing monetization because it was apparently infringing on the said Youtube partner's content, even if the footage in question was from a game. Still, I recall there being a lot of cases where Youtube did actually take down "infringing" videos automatically, so I guess the point still stands.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
