just noting that /r/games which is the biggest serious gaming community on reddit (not to be confused with the maymay shitstorm known as r/gaming) banned this video from hittin the frontpage along with anything else involving the kotaku blacklist.
[url]https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/3tzb4i/rgames_moderators_at_it_again_discussion_threads/[/url]
information game stronk
Well Jim.. we can't take Kotaku out of the equation. Using political journalism as an example, I wouldn't judge any company or official for telling the DailyMail or Infowars to fuck off.
I won't lie, I often like Jim's unscripted introductions and endings better than his actual content. Which isn't to say I dislike his content, I just like the unscripted bits better.
"I'm... I'm replacing this lectern. This is buuuuuuullshiiiiiiiit."
Y'know, I started off disliking Jim, finding him tacky and obnoxious. Now I find him an inspiration and absolutely entertaining to watch.
I should not have initially judged him by his 'cover.'
I did the same thing. I always had the impression he was going for a "greasy neckbeard" act which didn't really appeal to me, but as I see more of his content he makes good points about gaming.
Yep, Jim doesn't really help himself. He tends to make good points but I genuinely wish he'd act more respectably, it's not exactly fun when a big figurehead representing the opinions of a large portion of gamers intentionally speaks and acts like Jim does.
I do agree with him on this though.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
