A Chinese SWAT Officer Shows How To 'Control' A Rioter
83 replies, posted
[quote]The Reuters caption reads: "A policeman (2nd L) of the Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) controls a mock rioter during a SWAT police performance drill at a training base in Xi'an, Shaanxi province October 30, 2013."[/quote]
[img]http://static6.businessinsider.com/image/5273c65eeab8ea393f59419f-1200-/rtx14vx9.jpg[/img]
[url]http://www.businessinsider.com/chinese-swat-officer-and-mock-rioter-photo-2013-11[/url]
not a huge article, but sometimes a picture is worth 1000 words.
That looks like a move from some 3rd person action game.
Street Fighter S.W.A.T.
"As demonstrated this is how to curb stomp a rioter, now remember, unless the skull audibly crunches then you haven't done it hard enough, try jumping!"
Looks like he's recreating Ryse combat.
Jump up into the air and land on them, then pray to the dragons.
A picture is worth a thousand words, and most of them are generally assumptive bullshit.
[IMG]http://media.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/photos/images/2010/apr10/vietnam_sm/vietnam_sm14.jpg[/IMG]
I know the chinese government is pretty shit with it's human rights, but it is obvious that the entire point of the exercise was how to handle a violent offender, you can even see the big ass stick the guy was holding as a weapon.
edit- Furthermore this couldve been the split second in which the guy had been knocked down, for all we know that guy was up a split second ago and was merely knocked to the ground and still able to move. As an officer you're not going to let him get back up, you're going to tackle on top of him and hold him to the ground. It is a picture that was probably taken from an entire album and used exclusively for the reason it can be taken out of context.
-- derp --
Looks like he's a bird that's just about to land.
[QUOTE=1chains1;42726443]
I know the chinese government is pretty shit with it's human rights, but it is obvious that the entire point of the exercise was how to handle a violent offender, you can even see the big ass stick the guy was holding as a weapon.[/QUOTE]
this is criminal. the chinese police are well known for using violence against political dissidence.
[img]http://ciccib.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/tiananmen-square-1989.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE]The Reuters caption reads: "A policeman (2nd L) of the Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) controls a mock rioter during a SWAT police performance drill at a training base in Xi'an, Shaanxi province October 30, 2013."
That's one way to put it. It appears that the mock rioter has lost his weapon and is lying helplessly on the ground while the SWAT officer moves in to violently subdue him.
Notice the officers watching intently as the 2nd Lieutenant shows them how to establish "control."
Read more: [url]http://www.businessinsider.com/chinese-swat-officer-and-mock-rioter-photo-2013-11#ixzz2jQxnF3GH[/url][/QUOTE]
The way this is worded lmao
Can I just say that him jumping like that in a riot situation leaves him open to be tackled by another rioter mid-jump and get his shit kicked in
Not to matter that his shield is no longer protecting him, and is a good target for bricks and rocks and stuff, which is not something you want to get hit with mid-swing in bulky riot gear
There is no reason why both his feet should leave the ground while pulling a Rodney King
[QUOTE=yawmwen;42726502]this is criminal. the chinese police are well known for using violence against political dissidence.
[img]http://ciccib.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/tiananmen-square-1989.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/85/Tank_Man_Long_Shot_by_Stuart_Franklin.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=yawmwen;42726502]this is criminal. the chinese police are well known for using violence against political dissidence.
[img]http://ciccib.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/tiananmen-square-1989.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
Except that is the military and was brought in under martial law.
Doesn't excuse the atrocities that happened in that event, but this mock situation obviously involved someone who was violent and not a student protester.
Now if the guy had been wearing business attire with a briefcase and the officer was doing the same thing then my eye brow would be raised.
[QUOTE=1chains1;42726714]Except that is the military and was brought in under martial law.
Doesn't excuse the atrocities that happened in that event, but this mock situation obviously involved someone who was violent and not a student protester.
Now if the guy had been wearing business attire with a briefcase and the officer was doing the same thing then my eye brow would be raised.[/QUOTE]
[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IK0t3gb1k7s[/url]
[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kw91WCuOSRo[/url]
no this mock situation is to train chinese police to attack protesters, immigrants, and students who fight against the police state.
[QUOTE=yawmwen;42726502]this is criminal. the chinese police are well known for using violence against political dissidence.
[img]http://ciccib.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/tiananmen-square-1989.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]
The Chinese government of today is a hell of a far cry from what they were back then.
chinese atrocities sympathizer general
[QUOTE=l337k1ll4;42726805]The Chinese government of today is a hell of a far cry from what they were back then.[/QUOTE]
Far cry? Hardly. More like a nearby whimper, or at least a fair ways off sob.
[QUOTE=l337k1ll4;42726805]The Chinese government of today is a hell of a far cry from what they were back then.[/QUOTE]
They put down something like 300 domestic rebellions/mass protests a year, mostly against corruption. Not nearly as violent as in Tienanmen, bu I would bet my buttons that you'd see that sort of shit again when China goes full "overthrow the regime mode" like they're going to.
[QUOTE=1chains1;42726443]A picture is worth a thousand words, and most of them are generally assumptive bullshit.
[IMG]http://media.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/photos/images/2010/apr10/vietnam_sm/vietnam_sm14.jpg[/IMG]
[/QUOTE]
why did you link this? isn't this going against what you were saying?
By the way this is Nguyễn Ngọc Loan (south vietnamese general) executing a handcuffed prisoner and suspected vietcong member.
Fatality.
What the fuck, unless he's about to a sideflip kung-fu shit that's a shitload of wasted momentum.
[QUOTE=sloppy_joes;42728095]why did you link this? isn't this going against what you were saying?
By the way this is Nguyễn Ngọc Loan (south vietnamese general) executing a handcuffed prisoner and suspected vietcong member.[/QUOTE]
That photo exemplifies exactly what he is saying. That single photo caused a man who was trying to do the right thing to be vilified for the rest of his life. It's known as one of the most universally misunderstood photos ever.
[QUOTE=l337k1ll4;42728292]That photo exemplifies exactly what he is saying. That single photo caused a man who was trying to do the right thing to be vilified for the rest of his life. It's known as one of the most universally misunderstood photos ever.[/QUOTE]
Except, he executed a handcuffed man, how is that doing the right thing? Just because it's a time of war, you can execute whoever you want?
[QUOTE=l337k1ll4;42728292]That photo exemplifies exactly what he is saying. That single photo caused a man who was trying to do the right thing to be vilified for the rest of his life. It's known as one of the most universally misunderstood photos ever.[/QUOTE]
it villified a villain, a guy who executed an unarmed man with no trial or process.
[QUOTE=sloppy_joes;42728349]Except, he executed a handcuffed man, how is that doing the right thing? Just because it's a time of war, you can execute whoever you want?[/QUOTE]
Lem executed South Vietnamese police officers and their families and was captured at one of the mass graves. If I was a police officer and standing face to face with a war criminal who was killing the wives and children of my friends, I wouldn't be able to stop myself from shooting him either.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.