• Is the fact the, "child porn is illegal" unconstitutional?
    264 replies, posted
:siren: [b]IN NO WAY DO I SUPPORT CP[/b] :siren: So i was reading on the web and I found this: [nsfw] [url]http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/womens-consitutional-right-to-go-topless[/url] So they are claiming that not being allowed to be topless is unconstitutional, which i agree with. Now where do you draw the line? If young males don't have to wear a shirt, why should young females have to? So as soon as that young topless female kisses another young male in public, it is complete CP. Sorry if i wasn't too clear, ask questions or discuss.
Yeah, once they make it legal for women to go topless, it's a slippery slope. No way it should be allowed.
Laws are supposed to reflect the general morality of the community. The community is against child porn (rightfully so). So what does it matter? CP is and should be illegal. Easy as that.
I say let them be topless. and pantless. :smug:
Wait.. what.. A young female kissing a young male is CP? I don't understand. I never even knew that was considered CP. [highlight]Edit[/highlight] - Unless you mean the young female is topless.. Then of course its automatically CP..
[QUOTE=Zeke129;16932176]Laws are supposed to reflect the general morality of the community. The community is against child porn (rightfully so). So what does it matter? CP is and should be illegal. Easy as that.[/QUOTE] the CP community isn't against it
I think it should be completely illegal for minors to engage in an even relatively sexual act We should pull the line for age of consent higher because maturity can kick in at a very late time for females
It is called public indecency.
By that logic children should be allowed to smoke and drink. Yeah that'll be great
it's illegal because it's frowned upon by society.
[QUOTE=DemonDog;16932181]I say let them be topless. and pantless. :smug:[/QUOTE] I see a few problems with that.. Namely the [b]Ugly[/b]. It's a double edged dick.
[QUOTE=smurfy;16932207]By that logic children should be allowed to smoke and drink. Yeah that'll be great[/QUOTE] See, yet another reason why women shouldn't be allowed to go topless in public. It will ruin society.
[url]http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/womens-consitutional-right-to-go-topless[/url] Awesome. But one rule My family aren't allowed. Or pensioners
[QUOTE=lum1naire;16932191]Wait.. what.. A young female kissing a young male is CP? I don't understand. I never even knew that was considered CP. [highlight]Edit[/highlight] - Unless you mean the young female is topless.. Then of course its automatically CP..[/QUOTE] Yeah.
There's a child porn community? :smug:
[QUOTE=lum1naire;16932217]I see a few problems with that.. Namely the [b]Ugly[/b]. It's a double edged dick.[/QUOTE] There will always be a downside to the good parts.
Lets get naked!
Child pornography is against the law because it exploits children. It's a bad thing.
I had a good argument against topfreedom for women but I forget it now. now virgins will rate me disagree
[QUOTE=protoAuthor;16932259]Child pornography is against the law because it exploits children. It's a bad thing.[/QUOTE] yeah i know, in no way do i support CP.
[QUOTE=Elecbullet;16932264]I had a good argument against topfreedom for women but I forget it now. in b4 virgins rating me disagree[/QUOTE] Actually, in NY, I've heard women are allowed to go topless, provided it's not being used as a business.
Child pornography laws are designed to protect the rights of children in that children (prepubescents) cannot consent to sex in any way, shape or form. To try to not only force them to have sex but also tape it and sell it is a massive violation of those children's basic rights, namely in the fact that it is sexual exploitation. Post-pubescents are regarded with a proxy-system in which if you are within a certain age to a post-pubescent minor, you cannot be prosecuted in criminal court. Anybody who thinks child porn isn't a mass violation of rights is fucking stupid.
I think there should be severe restrictions like males having to wear shirts because chest muscles can be a remaining feature that was originally much like the breasts of females
FYI child pornography is not two teenagers making out in public. It's when you take prepubescents, force them to engage in sexual activity while taping them and then selling it or keeping it for "personal use".
[QUOTE=protoAuthor;16932275]Actually, in NY, I've heard women are allowed to go topless, provided it's not being used as a business.[/QUOTE] Any sensible woman doesn't though.. It's just called morals. We live by them. I understand freedom to do shit, but I agree that a line must be drawn. Even if in crayon. [editline]12:02AM[/editline] [QUOTE=Lankist;16932324]FYI child pornography is not two teenagers making out in public. It's when you take prepubescents, force them to engage in sexual activity while taping them and then selling it or keeping it for "personal use".[/QUOTE] It's CP if they're naked making out though.
[QUOTE=Lankist;16932324]FYI child pornography is not two teenagers making out in public. It's when you take prepubescents, force them to engage in sexual activity while taping them and then selling it.[/QUOTE] so 14 year olds having sex on tape isn't child porn? your wrong.
[QUOTE=lum1naire;16932331]Any sensible woman doesn't though.. It's just called morals. We live by them. I understand freedom to do shit, but I agree that a line must be drawn. Even if in crayon. [editline]12:02AM[/editline] It's CP if they're naked making out though.[/QUOTE] No it isn't. And legislating morality is fucking dumb.
[QUOTE=hottshot3312;16932339]so 14 year olds having sex on tape isn't child porn? your wrong.[/QUOTE] I think he actually said that it IS CP... Or did I read it wrong.
Exactly making out is sex
[QUOTE=hottshot3312;16932339]so 14 year olds having sex on tape isn't child porn? your wrong.[/QUOTE] It isn't if you're within the approximate age determined by local government. Keeping and distributing it, however.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.