• Child porn addict jailed after visits to swimming pool
    419 replies, posted
[IMG]http://cdn1.herald.ie/news/article30820474.ece/e64e7/ALTERNATES/h342/2014-12-11_new_5341924_I1.JPG[/IMG] [QUOTE]A sex offender has been sent back to jail for breaching the conditions of a suspended sentence after a judge heard the man went to a public swimming pool which young children attend. Barry Watters (38) also described a sexual fantasty involving a 14-year-old girl he met in an amusement arcade to his probation officer. In 2012, Watters received a four-year sentence with the final year suspended on strict conditions after he was caught repeatedly with child pornography. Yesterday Judge Martin Nolan activated the suspended portion of the sentence after hearing evidence that Watters has breached the court order. In October 2012, Watters pleaded guilty at Dublin Circuit Criminal Court to three counts of possession of child pornography at his former rented accommodation in Ongar, Dublin 15 on December 7, 2011. Explicit The majority of the 81 child pornography images seized by gardai in this case were high quality "anime" cartoons depicting children engaged in explicit sexual activity. About 20 images depicted children.[/QUOTE] There are more info in the source if you guys want to check it out right [URL="http://www.herald.ie/news/child-porn-addict-jailed-after-visits-to-swimming-pool-30820475.html"]here[/URL]. [highlight](User was permabanned for this post ("Gimmick" - Craptasket))[/highlight]
You signed up just to post this thread?
[quote]Barry Watters (38) also described a sexual fantasty involving a 14-year-old girl he met in an amusement arcade to his probation officer.[/quote] how can you be this stupid
20 of his 81 child porn pictures depicted children? :v:
[QUOTE=Annoyed Grunt;46749482]20 of his 81 child porn pictures depicted children? :v:[/QUOTE] The majority were Hentai, 20 of them were actual CP.
I understand there was a problem with the irl CP pics. I know we had this conversation tons of times already, but why DRAWN hentai pictures depicting UNEXISTENT children illegal?
[QUOTE=Chains!;46749488]The majority were Hentai, 20 of them were actual CP.[/QUOTE] Ha, Europe
This is a pretty important part of the article you left out. [quote]Last October Watters told the probation officer that he had been in an amusement arcade when a young girl, aged about 14, asked him the time. He said that he began asking her about the pop band One Direction and X-Factor to keep her talking. He told Ms McCabe that if the girl had asked him to go somewhere he'd have "jumped at the chance" and went on to say what he'd have done to her sexually.[/quote]
[quote]The majority of the 81 child pornography images seized by gardai in this case were high quality "anime" cartoons depicting children engaged in explicit sexual activity. About 20 images depicted children.[/quote] So buddy just had a fuckton of cake and got arrested for it.
[QUOTE=FreeHat;46749556]So buddy just had a fuckton of cake and got arrested for it.[/QUOTE] cake?
It seems to me that a person like this needs therapy more than they need jail time. I mean, yes he did violate his probation, but it's clear in many other senses that he has bigger issues that need to be worked through to make him "safe."
[QUOTE=proboardslol;46749505]Ha, Europe[/QUOTE] [QUOTE] high quality "anime" cartoons depicting children engaged in explicit sexual activity. [/QUOTE] [IMG]http://img.4plebs.org/boards/tg/image/1395/45/1395458505046.png[/IMG] ban this sick filth! :tinfoil: [QUOTE=eirexe;46749501]I understand there was a problem with the irl CP pics. I know we had this conversation tons of times already, but why DRAWN hentai pictures depicting UNEXISTENT children illegal?[/QUOTE] haven't you heard that ink and pixel abuse is a serious issue? :v: [QUOTE=Crazy Ivan;46749602]It seems to me that a person like this needs therapy more than they need jail time. I mean, yes he did violate his probation, but it's clear in many other senses that he has bigger issues that need to be worked through to make him "safe."[/QUOTE] i'd say he needs both, he still broke the law regardless.
[QUOTE=Wizards Court;46749629][IMG]http://img.4plebs.org/boards/tg/image/1395/45/1395458505046.png[/IMG] ban this sick filth! :tinfoil: haven't you heard that ink and pixel abuse is a serious issue? :v: i'd say he needs both, he still broke the law regardless.[/QUOTE] Liking loli still makes you a sick fuck, even if it shouldn't necessarily be equated to actual photos/videos of abused children.
[QUOTE=eirexe;46749501]I understand there was a problem with the irl CP pics. I know we had this conversation tons of times already, but why DRAWN hentai pictures depicting UNEXISTENT children illegal?[/QUOTE] Way to ignore the feelings of monitors around the world. How would you feel if you were forced to render CP hentai instead of beautiful BBC documentaries ?
typical dubliner
[QUOTE=InvaderNouga;46749675]Liking loli still makes you a sick fuck, even if it shouldn't necessarily be equated to actual photos/videos of abused children.[/QUOTE] drawn art is fictional just like video games, does that mean we're gonna stop shooting people? give people an alternative and they'll probably find themselves sated by it, give them no way around, and their curiosity will only grow. or you can have the mentality of a sane person, and not rape kids, and just enjoy drawings, but that's too hard to do for some it seems
one less horror in the world
So if he had 81 pics total and 20 were CP... He only had 61 hentai images? True casual.
if u wank to loli porn you're still wanking to a picture of a child, sure there might not be a victim but still, you're wanking to children
[QUOTE]Barry Watters (38) also described a sexual fantasty involving a 14-year-old girl he met in an amusement arcade to his probation officer.[/QUOTE] What a creep
[QUOTE=rampageturke 2;46749784]if u wank to loli porn you're still wanking to a picture of a child, sure there might not be a victim but still, you're wanking to children[/QUOTE] Because anime characters are, as we all know, the last bastion of realistic depiction of human beings
[QUOTE=eirexe;46749501]I understand there was a problem with the irl CP pics. I know we had this conversation tons of times already, but why DRAWN hentai pictures depicting UNEXISTENT children illegal?[/QUOTE] Just stop there, don't even go farther than that
[QUOTE=isnipeu;46749463]You signed up just to post this thread?[/QUOTE] everyone has a first post, are you gonna say "you signed up just to post this?" every time a new user makes their first post?
[QUOTE=InvaderNouga;46749675]Liking loli still makes you a sick fuck, even if it shouldn't necessarily be equated to actual photos/videos of abused children.[/QUOTE] Liking vore, gore, and rape make you a sick fuck too. As long as the shit you like is drawn it should be okay to view. Once it crosses over in to real life then there's a problem.
[quote]Probation Officer Janice McCabe told Ronan Kennedy BL, prosecuting: "His behaviour has deteriorated. We're not confident in supervising him." She said in a text message sent last month Watters called her a "b**ch" and a "rat" and continued: "I will have my day. I will rise with the flames of hell behind me. The devil will help me."[/quote] Ahahaha [quote]He told Ms McCabe that if the girl had asked him to go somewhere he'd have "jumped at the chance" and went on to say what he'd have done to her sexually.[/quote] What a normal, perfectly sane individual
81 pictures? Normally child porn 'addicts' have thousands or millions of pictures (I'm pretty certain I saw one article where the person actually had over a million pictures, jesus christ).
[QUOTE=Janus Vesta;46749797]Liking vore, gore, and rape make you a sick fuck too. As long as the shit you like is drawn it should be okay to view. Once it crosses over in to real life then there's a problem.[/QUOTE] If you jerk off to children, real or not, there's a problem already.
That said, I'm glad that it's only that much, and that only 20 of the pictures were real children. It's still 20 more than it should be, and this guy's clearly sick, but at least it hopefully means that fewer children were harmed for this particular person (I don't know how big 'bespoke' CP is... eurgh.) [editline]19th December 2014[/editline] [QUOTE=Gwoodman;46749822]If you jerk off to children, real or not, there's a problem already.[/QUOTE] We let people jerk off to guro, I don't believe that's illegal. Being aroused by children is fucked up but they can't choose it, and removing the stigma of simply [I]being[/I] a paedophile (as opposed to actually abusing children, which is disgusting) might let some of them actually seek help.
[QUOTE=Jamsponge;46749823]We let people jerk off to guro, I don't believe that's illegal. Being aroused by children is fucked up but they can't choose it, and removing the stigma of simply [I]being[/I] a paedophile (as opposed to actually abusing children, which is disgusting) might let some of them actually seek help.[/QUOTE] They should seek help, that's for sure but there's a lot of people out there that encourage them to continue because they are made to believe that jerking off to children drawings is OK because it's not real instead of encouraging them to get some rehabilitation. Help them improve, not continue to feed their kiddy desires or else they'll just keep being social weirdos that might harm a child one day.
[QUOTE=Gwoodman;46749822]If you jerk off to children, real or not, there's a problem already.[/QUOTE] There's a problem when you hurt actual people or, like this guy, try/plan to.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.