[url]http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/zero-punctuation/834-Red-Faction-Guerrilla[/url]
Damn it misspelled Guerrilla.
interesting, I have yet to try wrecking crew though, is it any good?
[QUOTE=WallyGamer4;16198868]interesting, I have yet to try wrecking crew though, is it any good?[/QUOTE]
it's okay it would be more fun if there wasn't a time limit
I wish I could continue playing it, but NOOOOOOOO my 360 is broken.
[QUOTE=DMGaina;16199075]I wish I could continue playing it, but NOOOOOOOO my 360 is broken.[/QUOTE]
Same. ):
Fucking RRoD. 3rd time.
I hope when they come owt with the DLC for Red Faction Guerrilla, it puts an option to remove the time limit.
While ZP is always hilarious, this one somewhat contradicts itself in which he first complains about limited ammunition and always having to run away from the enemy, and then immediately thereafter complains there wasn't enough focus on being a thoughtful guerrilla fighter.
I disagree with a lot of what he said. I thought the game was pretty fun, but I agree about the bit of running out of ammo and buildings standing on sticks and crumbling on you >_>.
I also thought the first one was pretty good. I remember digging really long tunnels using explosives and putting remote mines on my brother in multiplayer and blowing him up near other players.
He said Red Faction 1 was shite? WHAT THE FUCK?
Red Faction 1 was awesome!
The review was funny, not sure about his opinions though.
his opinions are somewhat skewed, Red Faction one was awesome, this one is awesome too! good review though.
This is one of the best reviews yet, I was laughing all the way through.
I really have to agree with the building part. The building can stay up when all that is supporting is is a piece of a wall. I t does fall down, you just have to wait a moment. If you get the building itself down to at least 15% it will collapse on its own weight. You just gotta wait a bit.
also RF1 was awesome.
Did this prick just insult RF1.
Fuck you Yahtzee. Fuck you.
People actually take the opinions in these reviews seriously?
[QUOTE=Takoto;16203302]People actually take the opinions in these reviews seriously?[/QUOTE]
He's not lying y'know
[QUOTE=Lambadvanced;16204184]He's not lying y'know[/QUOTE]
How can an opinion be a lie?
[QUOTE=Takoto;16204286]How can an opinion be a lie?[/QUOTE]
Why wouldn't we take them seriously if he's telling the truth? It's not like he's a bad reviewer anyway.
[QUOTE=Lambadvanced;16204401]Why wouldn't we take them seriously if he's telling the truth? It's not like he's a bad reviewer anyway.[/QUOTE]
Yeah he's an awesome reviewer, but I dont use his reviews to decide if a game is worth buying. He generally makes fun of everything.
[QUOTE=Takoto;16204474]Yeah he's an awesome reviewer, but I dont use his reviews to decide if a game is worth buying. He generally makes fun of everything.[/QUOTE]
If he's an awesome reviewer why don't you use his advice?
[QUOTE=Lambadvanced;16205136]If he's an awesome reviewer why don't you use his advice?[/QUOTE]
Probably because he usually talks mainly about the bad stuff about the game. Not that it shouldn't matter, but what I have come to find about his reviews is that I disagree with a lot about what he says about some games that I have played. It's all about opinion.
[QUOTE=Lambadvanced;16205136]If he's an awesome reviewer why don't you use his advice?[/QUOTE]
He makes games look completely horrible when he reviews them, unless he really likes them.
[QUOTE=TheDestroyer;16198660]
Damn it misspelled Guerrilla.[/QUOTE]
Don't worry, I called Mega64 Mega54
Well, he's right. The game has nothing else to offer than destruction and well... that gets boring after a while. The rest is just shallow story, stupid missions (go there kill that) driving to places and feeling completely useless because the EDF never try to reoccupy liberated sectors or properly defend sectors which they still own. They're just like "whatever".
Buyers remorse. :c
Oooh I've been waiting for this one :dance:
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
