JJ Abrams releases new Stark Trek clip.....3 FRAMES LONG!
26 replies, posted
[img]http://media2.firstshowing.net/firstshowing/img5/StarTrekIntoDarknessFlamecliptsr01.jpg[/img]
[quote]
"It's 3 frames, but—they're all there." Oh this is genius. And it's going to set the internet ablaze all because it's trick J.J. Abrams genius. So, J.J. Abrams was the guest on tonight's Conan O'Brien show, and to make the occasion something special, he decided to bring and debut the first ever clip from Star Trek Into Darkness, the Star Trek sequel hitting theaters next summer. But don't wet your pants just yet, it's the shortest clip you'll ever see. It's only 3 frames long. Not 3 seconds, 3 frames. Oh yea. The clip, and the entire funny Conan segment, is online for your viewing pleasure below. And yes, there is a freeze-frame available.
Here's the full Conan segment (via SlashFilm), where almost all of it is geeky setup for this short clip:
Okay, so the only other little tease he gives is in the "setup" for the clip. J.J. explains "this is a scene where Spock—who's one of the main characters—for reasons that you'll have to see the film to understand, he's in a volcano, in this crazy suit. And he's in this volcano, and this is the scene." Yep, that's exactly what it looks like - here's the freeze-frame ("you must examine it!"). So, first look at Zach Quinto as Spock in Star Trek Into Darkness? I guess we could say so. Pretty damn cool, but mostly just a fun little gimmick. Nonetheless, I'm still very anxious to see more from this whenever that will be. J.J. Abrams' Star Trek Into Darkness, also starring Chris Pine as Kirk, is arriving in theaters next summer on May 17th. What do you make of it?[/quote]
[url]http://www.firstshowing.net/2012/j-j-abrams-shows-3-frames-of-star-trek-into-darkness-on-conan/[/url]
VIDEO IN SOURCE
And fuck you paramount.
I don't really like on fire spock, guess I won't see the movie
Was he trying to imitate tumblr .gifs?
To be fair, my hype levels just went through the roof.
half life 3 confirmed
[QUOTE=Amiga OS;38030292]If they piss all over the wrath of khan with this ugly shit I will not be happy.[/QUOTE]
I'm gonna miss bodybuilder Khan, think we're getting "superior intellect" Khan this time round.
khan was supposed to be a superhuman if he's not super bulked i'mma be mad
Stark Trek? Tony Stark has taken Star Trek over I guess?
Also, that big tease. The only reason they released this is because there were pictures leaked of spock in a suit similar to the photo behind a green screen.
If this was The Hobbit the clip would only have been half as long
24 fps for life
I sincerely hope that they change the name of the movie.
[QUOTE=smurfy;38031024]If this was The Hobbit the clip would only have been half as long
24 fps for life[/QUOTE]
...But wouldn't it be 2x, seeing as it's 48fps?
[QUOTE=Jookia;38031622]...But wouldn't it be 2x, seeing as it's 48fps?[/QUOTE]
24 frames in a second
48 frames in a second
If you got 24 frames of a 24fps video, it would last for a second
If you got 24 frames of a 48fps video, it would last for half a second
Oh god, they completely ruined this movie. Will definitely not go and see this. I can't believe what they have done, character development looks poor, the action looks poor, I mean honestly. What were they thinking?
I thought Khan was confirmed NOT to be in this movie.
Why are we even talking about Khan anyways, I didn't see anything in the source.
Still, I wonder why just 3 frames for a preview.
I laughed harder than I should have.
Absolutely no fucks given on my part.
Gave up on watching the video after the third refresh of allowing temporary permissions in NoScript; I'll see it later, I guess.
dont worry, heres the preview
[img]http://www.geekarmada.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/startrek3frames1.gif[/img]
[editline]14th October 2012[/editline]
yep
thats the spocks death scene
spoiler
[QUOTE=itak365;38032327]Why are we even talking about Khan anyways, I didn't see anything in the source.
Still, I wonder why just 3 frames for a preview.[/QUOTE]Yeah, as I recall, they already said this isn't about Khan. I think the problem is people saw Benedict Cumberbatch in one of the leaks and they thought he was Khan, so it just stuck. I remember Simon Pegg getting really rather irritated with people because they kept going on about it being Khan.
Huh, I thought they confirmed he was playing Khan.
Well, if he's not then that's great as I really didn't want a retread.
[i]"Set phasers to integrated graphics."[/i]
I call fake...there's no lens flare in that clip.
[QUOTE=D3TBS;38033421]dont worry, heres the preview
[img]http://www.geekarmada.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/startrek3frames1.gif[/img]
[editline]14th October 2012[/editline]
yep[/QUOTE]
Party Hard
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.