would genuinely rather get my news from infowars than RT; at least all alex jones does is sell water purification kits to mental people rather than supply arms to syria
Hasn't RT been claiming this for the better part of eight years now?
And still with no valid proof.
Not once have I seen a guest on RT from an organisation I've actually heard of. They're always editors of obscure conspiracy websites or authors of books with clever-sounding titles, introduced as 'experts'
They're also extremely happy to present guests' rantings as fact. Some fucking 'expert' will come on the screen and just say "yeah well you know in 2003 George Bush went on TV and said he did 9/11, he just admitted it". And that's just it, there's no evidence presented
you are all brainwashed
[QUOTE=deerinheat;42171744]you are all brainwashed[/QUOTE]
I respect you're determination, but you must realize that Facepunch isn't ATS or Beforeitsnews or Infowars, just calling people brainwashed is going to do more harm than good. We use (or atleast try to) reason on this forum for pushing our points. Trolling, strawmanning, flaming, and strong unsupported opinions usually don't do very well here.
the comments on that video though
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/aixJl2m.png[/IMG]
I determined that 9/11 could never ever be an inside job because I know for a fact that a government as incompetent as our's couldn't keep it a secret for this long.
Amongst all the other facts, of course, that prove it wasn't an inside job.
[QUOTE=Zenreon117;42172589]I respect you're determination, but you must realize that Facepunch isn't ATS or Beforeitsnews or Infowars, just calling people brainwashed is going to do more harm than good. We use (or atleast try to) reason on this forum for pushing our points. Trolling, strawmanning, flaming, and strong unsupported opinions usually don't do very well here.[/QUOTE]
I could link you to close-up video footage of the explosive charges detonating at the base of the building if you'd like. Fuck face.
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("Rude" - Craptasket))[/highlight]
[QUOTE=deerinheat;42172969]I could link you to close-up video footage of the explosive charges detonating at the base of the building if you'd like. Fuck face.[/QUOTE]
You really are yelling at the wrong person. I am usually the one in your position, albeit a bit more tactfully.
Of course it was a inside job, the planes went inside the building, duh.
[QUOTE=Zenreon117;42173161]You really are yelling at the wrong person. I am usually the one in your position, albeit a bit more tactfully.[/QUOTE]
I am not angry at you, your reply just sounded really snide. Almost as if you thought I was being serious.
I posted this video because it is thought-provoking, not because it is necessarily an opinion that I feel strongly about.
[QUOTE=deerinheat;42173310]I am not angry at you, your reply just sounded really snide. Almost as if you thought I was being serious.[/QUOTE]
Wrong it was a conspiracy by Jason Bourne and the Green Lantern. You sheep are too blind to see it.
The Deathstar was an inside job. I can show you guys video of planted charges before the fighter fires its lasers
the funny thing about Russia Today is that it only exists outside of russia
[QUOTE=IliekBoxes;42173355]The Deathstar was an inside job. I can show you guys video of planted charges before the fighter fires its lasers[/QUOTE]
[video=youtube;2dvv-Yib1Xg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dvv-Yib1Xg[/video]
[QUOTE=Dog;42173665]the funny thing about Russia Today is that it only exists outside of russia[/QUOTE]
Wrong, there's Russian version too.
Russia Today. For Russians.
[editline]13th September 2013[/editline]
Nobody watches it anyways, because even federal "1st TV Channel" is more truthful than that, and that says a lot.
Who knows what to believe with this kind of media story. The news story itself has a hint of suspicion, like towards the end how they tie it together with Syria and how everybody wants America to not get involved "9 out of 10 people" Like where did he get that from? I almost felt like he made it up on the spot.
[QUOTE=deerinheat;42172969]I could link you to close-up video footage of the explosive charges detonating at the base of the building if you'd like. Fuck face.
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("Rude" - Craptasket))[/highlight][/QUOTE]
I need a source on this.
their "source" bill colby died in 1994
lmfao
[QUOTE=deerinheat;42172969]I could link you to close-up video footage of the explosive charges detonating at the base of the building if you'd like. Fuck face.[/QUOTE]
No, no you can't, because no such footage exists, and no such charges existed. And there's no need to be so rude about it.
I always love the argument that the jet fuel couldn't have melted the supports.
You're right, it didn't melt the supports, what it did do was WEAKEN them. And when those supports are holding up thousands of tons of building, it doesn't take a lot of weakening for them to buckle under the weight.
[QUOTE=deerinheat;42172969]I could link you to close-up video footage of the explosive charges detonating at the base of the building if you'd like. Fuck face.
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("Rude" - Craptasket))[/highlight][/QUOTE]
That was close, this guy almost blew the whole thing wide open
good job craptasket
[QUOTE=The Vman;42182644]I always love the argument that the jet fuel couldn't have melted the supports.
You're right, it didn't melt the supports, what it did do was WEAKEN them. And when those supports are holding up thousands of tons of building, it doesn't take a lot of weakening for them to buckle under the weight.[/QUOTE]
Shhhhh, there is no such thing as structural damage.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
