Tweets-Per-Second Record Set By Japan, Korea On New Year's Day 2013 - Polidicks

[QUOTE]ARTICLE: [url]http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/02/tweets-per-second-record_n_2396915.html[/url] [IMG]http://i.huffpost.com/gen/923721/thumbs/o-TWEETS-PER-SECOND-RECORD-570.jpg?6[/IMG] It's not so uncommon these days. When something significant happens, you want to share in that moment with your friends on social networks. On New Year's Day, status updates and tweets flooded Facebook and Twitter in the midnight hour. The graphic above depicts the spikes in tweets per second by time zone. (Scroll down to see a larger version.) Japan and South Korea recorded the most tweets, shattering the previous Twitter record for tweets posted per second as the clock struck midnight Tuesday. In all, the Japan Standard Time Zone fired 33,388 tweets per second to begin 2013. This handily defeated the old record of 25,088 tweets per second, also set by Japan during a television screening of the movie "Castle in the Sky." Users in the Eastern U.S. Time Zone came closest to matching Japan's New Year's Day record, with 13,336 tweets per second. It's not the first time Japan has set a record on New Year's Day. In 2009, Japanese tweeters began the new year by firing off 6,939 posts per second, a history-making milestone for Twitter at that time. Japan Crush reports that in one sense, the new record is not surprising, due to the Japanese custom of sending Nengajou, or 'New Year's Postcards.' These are increasingly being posted online. Twitter wasn't the only social network to see an influx of posts to begin the new year. China's Twitter-like Sina Weibo collected a record 729,571 messages per minute, The Next Web reports. The graphic below released by Twitter illustrates the tweets-per-second spike around the world as 2013 began. [/QUOTE] We humans must express ourselves..

I still don't understand Twitter. Ok, if someone actually gave a shit about what I was saying, I might understand it, but it looks like an evolution on blogging, and I'm still trying to figure out why the fuck you would want to do a personal blog.

[QUOTE=nikomo;39072622]I still don't understand Twitter. Ok, if someone actually gave a shit about what I was saying, I might understand it, but it looks like an evolution on blogging, and I'm still trying to figure out why the fuck you would want to do a personal blog.[/QUOTE] Some people don't mind having transparency in their lives. Some people want attention (and why not? they can give it back). I for one don't mind 90% transparency in my life but a lot of people do I understand that. Especially Facepuncher (consider the circumstances they come to be on Facepunch). I'm not a private man, and a lot of people aren't either.

[QUOTE=nikomo;39072622]I still don't understand Twitter. Ok, if someone actually gave a shit about what I was saying, I might understand it, but it looks like an evolution on blogging, and I'm still trying to figure out why the fuck you would want to do a personal blog.[/QUOTE] The people who don't understand twitter, are the people who think that actual logical twitter users sit on the site reading how people ate a ham sandwich.

[QUOTE=nikomo;39072622]I still don't understand Twitter. Ok, if someone actually gave a shit about what I was saying, I might understand it, but it looks like an evolution on blogging, and I'm still trying to figure out why the fuck you would want to do a personal blog.[/QUOTE] It's actually really useful for getting news. Subscribe to some aggregate sources and get links about relevant stuff that you find interesting. I still prefer my RSS feeds, but twitter has its uses.

[QUOTE=nikomo;39072622]I still don't understand Twitter. Ok, if someone actually gave a shit about what I was saying, I might understand it, but it looks like an evolution on blogging, and I'm still trying to figure out why the fuck you would want to do a personal blog.[/QUOTE] I just follow devs and interesting people. Get some free shit from them from time to time and get some news etc.

-snip-