Sick asshole brands his girlfriend's vagina with his name.
102 replies, posted
[quote]A Chandler man drugged his girlfriend and branded his initials into her vagina while she was passed out, police say.
Christopher Lynn Jackson, the owner of a landscaping business called Lawn Tamers, "bragged" to his now-ex-girlfriend about doing the same thing to other girlfriends in the past, according to court documents obtained by New Times...
...The woman told police that Jackson "bragged" to her that he'd done that to other girlfriends in the past and explained to her that he wanted to do the same thing to her because "her vagina was his," court documents state.[/quote]
[url]http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2013/09/christopher_jackson_branded_hi.php[/url]
[QUOTE]Although the incident occurred in May, she just recently reported it to police. An examination showed that the letters "C" and "J" were still "clearly"[/QUOTE]
She waited till now to report this?
This is sick and all but how stupid do you have to be to stay with a man who openly brags about having done this in the past?
[QUOTE=Rangergxi;42212775]She waited till now to report this?[/QUOTE]
It's not like being scared he'll do worse if you tell people is a thing.
what the fuck
Photo or it didn't happen >_>
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("meme reply" - Orkel))[/highlight]
That's pretty kinky.
Aggravated assault with serious physical injury is another very good name for it, tho.
[QUOTE=ash47;42212837]Photo or it didn't happen >_>[/QUOTE]
...seriously. Have some respect
Do they mean like in the vagina or just on top of her pubic mound or something.
You a busta CJ, a straight up busta.
Probably as far away from gentleman as you can possibly get.
[QUOTE=Sir Whoopsalot;42212802]It's not like being scared he'll do worse if you tell people is a thing.[/QUOTE]
Agreed. It had to be pretty humiliating coming forward too because of how you have to provide the evidence.
Most guys are happy with the Fleshlight brand of vagina but this guy just has to be different.
How deluded.
Ehm.
What? On her vagina?!
The vagina is internal. I doubt very much he branded that, nor would it be very much use branding that since noone would see it but the gynaecologist.
Do they mean it was branded on her labia minora/majora, on her vulva or her mons pubis or what?
I am left in the unclear by shoddy reporting and incorrect anatomical vocabulary.
[QUOTE=Pr0fane;42213265]Ehm.
What? On her vagina?!
The vagina is internal. I doubt very much he branded that, nor would it be very much use branding that since noone would see it but the gynaecologist.
Do they mean it was branded on her labia minora/majora, on her vulva or her mons pubis or what?
I am left in the unclear by shoddy reporting and incorrect anatomical vocabulary.[/QUOTE]
How terrible. I feel really sorry for you. You should probably write a complaint, somewhere, that they aren't telling you what sort of terribly mangled the woman exactly is.
[QUOTE=Pr0fane;42213265]Ehm.
What? On her vagina?!
The vagina is internal. I doubt very much he branded that, nor would it be very much use branding that since noone would see it but the gynaecologist.
Do they mean it was branded on her labia minora/majora, on her vulva or her mons pubis or what?
I am left in the unclear by shoddy reporting and incorrect anatomical vocabulary.[/QUOTE]
I am pretty sure when they say Vagina, they mean overall. Since when I hear Vagina, I think all of it, not just the inside.
There's no all of it. There's just the inside when you say 'vagina'.
[QUOTE=Pr0fane;42213265]Ehm.
What? On her vagina?!
The vagina is internal. I doubt very much he branded that, nor would it be very much use branding that since noone would see it but the gynaecologist.
Do they mean it was branded on her labia minora/majora, on her vulva or her mons pubis or what?
I am left in the unclear by shoddy reporting and incorrect anatomical vocabulary.[/QUOTE]
She got a brand on her cunt okay you happy now?
[QUOTE=Pr0fane;42213356]There's no all of it. There's just the inside when you say 'vagina'.[/QUOTE]
Stop being pedantic, it doesn't take much thought to know what the article means
[QUOTE=Pr0fane;42213265]Ehm.
What? On her vagina?!
The vagina is internal. I doubt very much he branded that, nor would it be very much use branding that since noone would see it but the gynaecologist.
Do they mean it was branded on her labia minora/majora, on her vulva or her mons pubis or what?
I am left in the unclear by shoddy reporting and incorrect anatomical vocabulary.[/QUOTE]
Wow, I am so ~amazed~ by your knowledge of the ~female genitals~ tell me more oh great anatomist.
[QUOTE=i-am-teh-sex;42213394]Stop being pedantic, it doesn't take much thought to know what the article means[/QUOTE]
All you douches who think I am fascinated by the horrible treatment this girl sufferend under that prick, I'm not.
I was just, maybe clumsily, poking fun at the incorrectness of this article and how many people use the wrong words. She didn't get branded on the vagina, so why say "yeah you know what we mean, so we can use the wrong word anyways"
If you put that shit in a criminal indictment, he'd get acquitted because it's fucking wrong.
That's why I said it, not because "lol she got burned on her private parts".
[QUOTE=Sprockethead;42212902]Probably as far away from gentleman as you can possibly get.[/QUOTE]
Yeah no fedora and neckbeard 0/10
[QUOTE=Rangergxi;42212775]She waited till now to report this?[/QUOTE]
Well there are lots of reasons that people don't immediately tell that they've been wronged. It could be fear that something worse could happen or shame that it happened to her. Or she was hoping that the brand would go away with time.
He seems like this kind of person.
[IMG]http://pbs.twimg.com/media/BLZap8VCEAAIFua.jpg:large[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Pr0fane;42213265]Ehm.
What? On her vagina?!
The vagina is internal. I doubt very much he branded that, nor would it be very much use branding that since noone would see it but the gynaecologist.
Do they mean it was branded on her labia minora/majora, on her vulva or her mons pubis or what?
I am left in the unclear by shoddy reporting and incorrect anatomical vocabulary.[/QUOTE]
Hey guys remember that thread asking why nobody likes blatantly autistic posters
Holy fucking shit I've always said there are sick assholes in my hometown, but this is a whole new level.
[QUOTE=Pr0fane;42213509]All you douches who think I am fascinated by the horrible treatment this girl sufferend under that prick, I'm not.
I was just, maybe clumsily, poking fun at the incorrectness of this article and how many people use the wrong words. She didn't get branded on the vagina, so why say "yeah you know what we mean, so we can use the wrong word anyways"
If you put that shit in a criminal indictment, he'd get acquitted because it's fucking wrong.
That's why I said it, not because "lol she got burned on her private parts".[/QUOTE]
if we got rid of every single news article that wasn't 100% worded correctly and wasn't phrased and written perfectly, there would be no news articles.
quit bitching
[QUOTE=Andokool12;42213978]Hey guys remember that thread asking why nobody likes blatantly autistic posters[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=ief014;42214154]if we got rid of every single news article that wasn't 100% worded correctly and wasn't phrased and written perfectly, there would be no news articles.
quit bitching[/QUOTE]
Yes because making a joke to make a boring subject like "the decline of journalistic standards" more discussable is something clearly autistic.
I don't care very much for that "lets just accept things are stupid and wrong all the time because going against it is hard and boring" of most people here.
[QUOTE=Pr0fane;42213265]Ehm.
What? On her vagina?!
The vagina is internal. I doubt very much he branded that, nor would it be very much use branding that since noone would see it but the gynaecologist.
Do they mean it was branded on her labia minora/majora, on her vulva or her mons pubis or what?
I am left in the unclear by shoddy reporting and incorrect anatomical vocabulary.[/QUOTE]
Now aren't you the Biologist.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.