Alcohol fuelled Muslim girl gang attack white woman and are freed because they dont drink. - Polidicks

[release] [b]Girl gang who kicked woman in the head while yelling 'kill the white slag' freed after judge hears 'they weren't used to drinking because they're Muslims.[/b] - Yobs ripped lump of hair from Rhea Page's head during High Street attack - Three sisters and cousin escape with six-month suspended sentences - Maximum term for assault occasioning actual bodily harm is five years in jail - Judge: "Those who knock someone to the floor and kick them in the head can expect to go inside, but I'm going to suspend the sentence" A gang of Muslim girls who repeatedly kicked a young woman in the head walked free from court after a judge heard they were 'not used to being drunk' because of their religion. The group screamed 'kill the white slag' while kicks raining in on 22-year-old Rhea Page as she lay motionless on the ground, the court heard. The attackers - three sisters and their cousin - were told by a judge that normally they would have been sent to jail. However, he handed the girls - all Somalian Muslims - suspended sentences after hearing that they were not used to alcohol because their religion does not allow it. [/release] This is horrendous news and the women should have a normal jail sentence despite their religion. Read more: [url]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2070562/Muslim-girl-gang-kicked-Rhea-Page-head-yelling-kill-white-slag-FREED.html#ixzz1fmAEMXnp[/url]

Fucking disgusting, saying that you're not used to drinking isn't any excuse to do this shit to anyone. Also it seems to be racially motivated and they got off, the fuck.

That's ridiculous, though it is a Daily Mail article so it's suspicious.

A+ legal system

could it be anything other than dailymail? though if it is true, then UK's legal system is severely fucked

Article seems pretty biased, its still messed up though

Fuck the fact they're not used to drinking. They got drunk, they fucked up, they should suffer the consequences. Not get away with this shit just because "they're not used to drinking". If I were to get blind stinking drunk on my first time ever drinking you can bet your ass I wouldn't get away with it.

What does "six-month suspended sentences" mean? How badly was the girl injured? Were they actually attempting to kill her, or is that just something they yelled?

[QUOTE=BuffaloBill;33598438]Fuck the fact they're not used to drinking. They got drunk, they fucked up, they should suffer the consequences. Not get away with this shit just because "they're not used to drinking". If I were to get blind stinking drunk on my first time ever drinking you can bet your ass I wouldn't get away with it.[/QUOTE] The first time I got drunk I got really drunk, and I was calm as fuck, I was just happy and wanted to talk to everyone. I don't get people who want to fight and whatnot when they're drunk.

[QUOTE=markg06;33598413]That's ridiculous, though it is a Daily Mail article so it's suspicious.[/QUOTE] It's not a tabloid, so at least it's not The Sun.

The daily mail hasn't had a field day like this since when they introduced the metric system.

Yeah, I saw this a while ago. Fucking ridiculous. [QUOTE=markg06;33598413]That's ridiculous, though it is a Daily Mail article so it's suspicious.[/QUOTE] Yeah I thought so too, but Telegraph posted the news as well. [url]http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/8937856/Muslim-women-not-used-to-drinking-walk-free-after-attack-on-woman.html[/url]

[QUOTE=Master X;33598445]What does "six-month suspended sentences" mean? How badly was the girl injured? Were they actually attempting to kill her, or is that just something they yelled?[/QUOTE] A suspended sentence is a legal term for a judge's delaying of a defendant's serving of a sentence after they have been found guilty. Put it this way, the girl is scared to leave her house and has lost her job due to stress and flashbacks.

There's clearly a whole lot more to this story, but for the life of me I can't find it anywhere but Sun, Mail and rightwing blogs. [editline]6th December 2011[/editline] Actual Bodily Harm? Sounds more like GBH to me if the article is accurate

[QUOTE=A.C.I.D;33598503]There's clearly a whole lot more to this story, but for the life of me I can't find it anywhere but Sun, Mail and rightwing blogs.[/QUOTE] I will keep searching and if I find anything I'll post it here. There probably is more, and I don't really like the daily mail either.

Urgh, Somalians.

If this story is true, I wouldn't be entirely surprised. Not that the girl was attacked, but that the girls were let off. Our government is really eager to let off anyone who might cause a scene, which is why the reaction to the riots was so horrible.

If a drunk mormon had done the same to any minority, he'd be in jail for a freaking long time. Disgusting.

drunk thoughts speak a sober mind.

really fucking obviously fake

[QUOTE=AK'z;33598466]It's not a tabloid, so at least it's not The Sun.[/QUOTE] The Daily Mail is a terrible paper, it's basically everything wrong is because of immigrants/black people in general and everything would be better if Diana wasn't dead.

Fucking morons Just because the legal system is under the illusion that it's the substances that actually cause people to do nasty things doesn't mean it's true. It was their own fucking idea, the alcohol didn't put it there therefore the fact that they are not used to alcohol is completely fucking irrelevant. Fucking fuck fucking fuck fuck foo. Yeah. Disregard if this is just Daily Mail hysteria.

[QUOTE=Cypher_09;33598587]really fucking obviously fake[/QUOTE] [url]http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/8937856/Muslim-women-not-used-to-drinking-walk-free-after-attack-on-woman.html[/url] Just going to repost that for you. It might be the Torygraph, but apart from it's right wing slant, it's not a tabloid, but a respectable news source. And even has CCTV footage of the incident.

Can we get another source since the Dailymail and the telegraph are notoriously bias against muslims and immigrants. [editline]6th December 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Craigewan;33598620][url]http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/8937856/Muslim-women-not-used-to-drinking-walk-free-after-attack-on-woman.html[/url] Just going to repost that for you.[/QUOTE] They are also a conservative news paper.

[QUOTE=A.C.I.D;33598503]There's clearly a whole lot more to this story, but for the life of me I can't find it anywhere but Sun, Mail and rightwing blogs. [editline]6th December 2011[/editline] Actual Bodily Harm? Sounds more like GBH to me if the article is accurate[/QUOTE] GBH is using a weapon, actual bodily harm is using fists/feet

[QUOTE=gazzy_GUI;33598401]Fucking disgusting, saying that you're not used to drinking isn't any excuse to do this shit to anyone. Also it seems to be racially motivated and they got off, the fuck.[/QUOTE] it must be true because i read it in the daily mail!

[QUOTE=Cone;33598549]If this story is true, I wouldn't be entirely surprised. Not that the girl was attacked, but that the girls were let off. Our government is really eager to let off anyone who might cause a scene, which is why the reaction to the riots was so horrible.[/QUOTE] It's completely idiotic that they would let them off even though this was quite obviously a racial hate crime. Bad enough that they got off due to the religion card but the fact they're basically ignoring a hate crime speaks volumes.

[QUOTE=markg06;33598605]The Daily Mail is a terrible paper, it's basically everything wrong is because of immigrants/black people in general and everything would be better if Diana wasn't dead.[/QUOTE] Who the hell was Diana anyways? Wasn't she that drunken whore who died in a car crash? The comment above is more than enough to make Daily Mail readers explode with rage.

[QUOTE=carcarcargo;33598621]Can we get another source since the Dailymail and the telegraph are notoriously bias against muslims and immigrants. [editline]6th December 2011[/editline] They are also a conservative news paper.[/QUOTE] It has a video of the attack. And the Torygraph having a right-wing bias doesn't mean it doesn't report on actual news (It's not the Daily Mail/The Sun), it just couches it Right-Wingly. I don't like the Telegraph, but it's a valid news source.

Couldn't this actually be classified as a racially fueled hate crime.