• Obama in Contempt of Court in ‘Birther’ Hearing
    52 replies, posted
Source: [url]http://www.infowars.com/obama-in-contempt-of-court-in-birther-hearing-infowars-nightly-news/[/url] [quote] Infowars Nightly News examines a leaked video of Rand Paul at the Nashville airport. Contrary to corporate media reports, Paul did not become irate and freak out over his detainment by the TSA and police. Obama is found in contempt of court of refusing to show up for a hearing on the eligibility issue over his birth certificate. [/quote] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-IGT9S5cmiE[/media] And it continues... The video has some other goodies in it, so watch that too.
using this website as a source is about as bad as taking fox news seriously
What the heck is this? Oh wait, it's just a faze thread. Move along people.
InfoWars is run by Alex Jones, who is a known conspiracy theorist. Pretty sure this story is bullshit.
I'd sooner believe tales from Comical Ali.
[QUOTE=TwinkieHouse;34450331]InfoWars is run by Alex Jones, who is a known conspiracy theorist. Pretty sure this story is bullshit.[/QUOTE] infowars has more bullshit in it then SOPA
Infowars? Oh faze, even this is low for you,
[QUOTE=TwinkieHouse;34450331]InfoWars is run by Alex Jones, who is a known conspiracy theorist. Pretty sure this story is bullshit.[/QUOTE] Uh, he didn't attend a hearing that he was supposed to be attending. [url]http://www.newsmax.com/US/Obama-birthers-birth-certificate/2012/01/26/id/425660[/url]
[QUOTE=faze;34450366]Uh, he didn't attend a hearing that he was supposed to be attending. [url]http://www.newsmax.com/US/Obama-birthers-birth-certificate/2012/01/26/id/425660[/url][/QUOTE] then use a better source then infowars, like fox news
[QUOTE=faze;34450366]Uh, he didn't attend a hearing that he was supposed to be attending. [url]http://www.newsmax.com/US/Obama-birthers-birth-certificate/2012/01/26/id/425660[/url][/QUOTE] Tony Blair and Bush didn't attend war criminals hearings, either. Of course, nobody cares what Malaysia thinks, right? A disproven and ridiculous waste of time is far more important, clearly.
[QUOTE=MrEndangered;34450394]Tony Blair and Bush didn't attend war criminals hearings, either. Of course, nobody cares what Malaysia thinks, right? A disproven and ridiculous waste of time is far more important, clearly.[/QUOTE] Those hearings didn't take place [B]in the United States.[/B]
[QUOTE=faze;34450366]Uh, he didn't attend a hearing that he was supposed to be attending. [url]http://www.newsmax.com/US/Obama-birthers-birth-certificate/2012/01/26/id/425660[/url][/QUOTE]Why did you even use Infowars in the first place if there's far better sites that have the story? And in that more reliable source: "Neither the president nor his attorneys attended the hearing, [B]and lawyers for the plaintiffs argued[/B] that Obama should be held in contempt of court" Quite a massive difference compared to the court actually finding Obama guilty of contempt of court.
[QUOTE=Hidole555;34450418]Those hearings didn't take place [B]in the United States.[/B][/QUOTE] Are you saying I think Malaysia is a US state?
[QUOTE=Sgt Doom;34450419]Why did you even use Infowars in the first place if there's far better sites that have the story? And in that more reliable source: "Neither the president nor his attorneys attended the hearing, [B]and lawyers for the plaintiffs argued[/B] that Obama should be held in contempt of court"[/QUOTE] Exactly, it's just the Birthers trying to pin anything on him that they can.
[QUOTE=Sgt Doom;34450419]Why did you even use Infowars in the first place if there's far better sites that have the story? And in that more reliable source: "Neither the president nor his attorneys attended the hearing, [B]and lawyers for the plaintiffs argued[/B] that Obama should be held in contempt of court"[/QUOTE] That pretty much settles it all. He's not in contempt of court, lawyers just think he should be.
[QUOTE=MrEndangered;34450431]Are you saying I think Malaysia is a US state?[/QUOTE] No. I'm saying a ruling in a court in the US would matter more to a President than a ruling in a court in Malaysia.
The "leaked" video that purports to show Paul's "illegal detainment" only shows him sitting down for a total of four minutes, from 00:42 to 00:46, according to the timecode. It looks like whoever uploaded it deliberately cut out a few frames here and there to make it appear as though it was longer.
[QUOTE=Hidole555;34450460]No. I'm saying a ruling in a court in the US would matter more to a President than a ruling in a court in Malaysia.[/QUOTE] Why should it? Their lawyers are the ones that do the traveling, not them. But of course, Americans are always more important.
[QUOTE=viperfan7;34450378]then use a better source then infowars, like fox news[/QUOTE] Or the Daily Mail. Or the Enquirer. Or that guy who lives under the overpass.
I wouldn't show up to court if some blithering idiot asked me to prove my identity.
[QUOTE=Mingebox;34450528]Or the Daily Mail. Or the Enquirer. Or that guy who lives under the overpass.[/QUOTE] Or RawStory. Or AlterNet. Or MotherJones.
[QUOTE=SPESSMEHREN;34450571]Or RawStory. Or AlterNet. Or MotherJones.[/QUOTE] Or a Geocities website about someone's puppy. [editline]29th January 2012[/editline] Wait, if someone had a Geocities website about a puppy, that puppy would be dead by now. I just made myself sad.
an InfoWars story about Obamas birth certificate what the fuck is wrong with you
[QUOTE=Kopimi;34450709]an InfoWars story about Obamas birth certificate what the fuck is wrong with you[/QUOTE] Faze must be a liberal. Nobody who's a genuinely concerned conservative would make themselves look so stupid. Faze, marine, Uber and glaber ruin the right-wing reputation (Which suits me, but hey). I wish we had more Emperor Scorpius's.
The Facepunch guide to determining accurate news sources! Is it political news? Yes: Is it bashing a conservative? Yes: Accurate. No: Criticize, accuse of lying. Is it praising a liberal? Yes: Accurate. No: Criticize, accuse of lying. [editline]29th January 2012[/editline] Not to say that infowars is an accurate news source. It isn't.
[t]http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_rH1PqYq7iu0/SpIt55f6aZI/AAAAAAAAAJs/SrA0br4DHvg/s1600/H1N1fluSHOT.jpg[/t] good example of what to expect from infowars
Wow, that was a genuinely crap post, Strongbad. Do you have any idea what infowars is or how shit it is?
[QUOTE=Strongbad;34450988] bla bla bla [/QUOTE] wow so edgy~~
[QUOTE=Doctor Zedacon;34451038]Wow, that was a genuinely crap post, Strongbad. Do you have any idea what infowars is or how shit it is?[/QUOTE] Note that I said that infowars is not an accurate news source. I was simply noting a pattern I'd observed in the News section. Here, let me spare you the monumental effort of pointing out what I said. [quote]Not to say that infowars is an accurate news source. It isn't. [/quote]
[QUOTE=Strongbad;34451057]Note that I said that infowars is not an accurate news source. I was simply noting a pattern I'd observed in the News section. Here, let me spare you the monumental effort of pointing out what I said.[/QUOTE]Yeah, you added that on afterwards. It wasn't there when I responded.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.