How the...
Why would you....
I... I don't even....
:quagmire:
Damn, that smilie doesn't fit.
The video spent too much time explaining everything rather than showing it, it ended the moment my jaw began to drop.
I am pretty confused
Thanks, I got a headache from that.
great another thing to put on my list of things i dont understand.
Even though I must say this is all really clever and cool, I really doubt how much fun there is to be had with this.
I mean, stuff turned in to what I call an unmanageable clusterfuck of snakes and lines. And I really doubt if any fun games can be made with this.
Whenever somebody explains the geometry of a 4 dimensional shape I can never understand it.
Umm isn't the 4 dimension time itself? So what he calls 3 is actually 4 since time is advancing, so it is technically moving through time.
Yes?
[QUOTE=coco911231;30878952]great another thing to put on my list of things i dont understand.[/QUOTE]
Whats number one? girls?
Looks boring. Third dimension is best dimension.
I understood literally 0% of that
Time traveling SNAAAAAAAAAAKE.
[img]http://oapboap.org/img/mgs.1062.png[/img]
I'm confus
It reminds me off my old math teacher, I really liked him, my favorite teacher. He actually taught us stuff outside the curriculum when we asked about stuff, pretty awesome dude. But yeah he tried to explain to me and a couple friends other dimensions. Mathematically, he said it's really easy to show other dimensions, like for the size of it, you would just find a side and put it to whatever power, 2 dimensions you have squared, or ^2, cubed, and so on, but the tricky part is representing it, and stuff like that. It was really awesome to see a guy who loved teaching and loved math.
TOTALLY understand this...
How will this help me collect cubes?
[QUOTE=thrawn2787;30880117]Umm isn't the 4 dimension time itself? So what he calls 3 is actually 4 since time is advancing, so it is technically moving through time.
Yes?[/QUOTE]
We represent time as a variable in a parametric equation in mathematics. In physics I believe they say that spacetime is what we should call the fourth dimension. Spacetime is a distorted on mass (which we have no fucking clue what causes mass).
But in math and whatnot, the fourth dimension is just adding another coordinate. Most of the same rules apply for vectors and calculus in 4D (which was fucking annoying in Calc 3 when we went over the section with lagrange multipliers). How you want to represent or explain 4D is up to the individual but we can't experience it.
[img]http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lke7rygU2o1qj72q0o1_500.jpg[/img]
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("Image macro" - Orkel))[/highlight]
that's cool, I never looked at the 4d cube as a representation where at one form the future is on the inner part, so those gifs of the cube are basically time flow
Seems hard.
Marty, you're not thinking fourh dimensionally!
I thought mathematically, there was a spacial fourth dimension, rather than it being "time".
For instance, a lot of theoretical physics related ideas need the existence of 10 or more dimensions (whatever that means), implying they aren't all time.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
