• Samsung seeks ban of iPhone and iPad in The Netherlands
    27 replies, posted
[quote] Samsung Electronics has hit Apple with four patent cases in district court in The Hague, Netherlands, demanding a sales ban and a retail recall of all Apple products that use 3G technology. Similar Articles: Apple files inaccurate evidence in Dutch Samsung case Q&A: Tech patent expert Florian Mueller on smartphone lawsuits Apple wins ban on German sales of Samsung tablet Under the Gavel: On all fronts Samsung postpones tablet launch in Australia Apple awarded patent for iPhone interface The first hearing in the case is scheduled for Monday. Samsung in The Netherlands is demanding a preliminary injunction against all mobile products of Apple “specifically iPhone 3GS, iPhone 4, iPad 1, and iPad 2.” All these devices infringe four of Samsung’s essential 3G patents, the Korea-based tech giant claims in the complaints, which Webwereld, a Dutch IDG publication, has viewed. Samsung is seeking a ban in The Netherlands on importing, trading and sales by Apple and five Apple subsidiaries. Additionally, Samsung wants Apple to recall all infringing devices in stock from its “professional customers,” including electronics stores like Media Markt, where Apple has set up a shop-in-a-shop business. Samsung has filed separate cases for each of the four patents it is invoking against Apple in The Hague. The patents are related to methods of managing the data connection and speed between a mobile station, such as a smartphone or tablet, and a network base station. Samsung is also invoking similar patents in other cases against Apple in the U.S., the U.K., France, Germany, Japan and South Korea. The patents in question are so called standards-essential, which means they are incorporated in internationally accepted technology standards—in this case, 3G and UMTS standards as ratified by organizations such as ETSI. For Samsung this actually can turn out to be a liability, because however solid or crucial these patents might be, Samsung cannot deny Apple a license. This is because holders of standards-essential patents come have an obligation to provide all third parties with a licence under fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms, the so-called RAND or FRAND terms. Apple’s lawyers have requested an additional hearing to address these FRAND licensing issues before considering any other legal or technical issues. The district court judge has granted this request, meaning the hearing next Monday will only focus on these FRAND issues, a clerk of the court confirmed to Webwereld. Patent consultant and activist Florian Mueller applauded this decision. “I think the court in The Hague does the right thing by evaluating those FRAND issues first,” Mueller said. “This can simplify the whole case because it may reduce it to the question of whether Apple owes Samsung any money, and if so, how much, without any need to talk about an injunction.” Mueller is critical of Apple’s worldwide patent offensive, but he is even more critical of Samsung’s reply, which according to him amounts to “scattershot litigation around the globe with light and questionable artillery,” hoping to create a degree of legal uncertainty that might force Apple into a settlement favorable to Samsung. “Should it turn out that Apple entered the market without taking licenses to essential patents, then that’s indefensible and Apple should pay,” Mueller said. “However, it doesn’t justify an abuse of standards-essential patents. Asking for an injunction is an abuse unless the request for the injunction is limited to the scenario in which the defendant doesn’t accept to pay FRAND royalties.” Apple and Samsung and their respective counsels declined to comment, citing ongoing litigation.[/quote] [url]http://www.macworld.com/article/162462/2011/09/samsung_seeks_ban_of_iphone_and_ipad_in_the_netherlands.html#lsrc.rss_main[/url] JUST FUCKING STOP ALREADY, BOTH OF YOU.
This is becoming too fucking childish.
When you play with fire, you get burned. All of this "You sue me, well I'll sue you! You sue me? Well, fuck you, I'm going to sue you again! No fuck you, I'm a sue you" shit is getting ridiculous.
Samsung has orders of magnitude more patents that Apple, surely it would be simple to sue their ass to bankrupcy?
[QUOTE=Fatal-Error;32444123]Samsung has orders of magnitude more patents that Apple, surely it would be simple to sue their ass to bankrupcy?[/QUOTE] It would be more effective to invalidate both companies patent portfolios and not allow either of them to file for any more.
Sometimes I love living here... sometimes I don't.
[QUOTE=Zanfall;32444227]It would be more effective to invalidate both companies patent portfolios and not allow either of them to file for any more.[/QUOTE] Samsung make a lot more than a few toys like Apple do. Some rather important pieces of machinery require support and warrenties from Samsung.
If in doubt, throw lawyers at it
Close both companies.
About time apple got counter sued for the bullshit they're pulling.
Does everyone in these companies feel they need to sue each other, or is that just what their legal departments think?
[QUOTE=wari65;32446587]Does everyone in these companies feel they need to sue each other, or is that just what their legal departments think?[/QUOTE] They pretty much [B]do[/b] need to sue each other. If Samsung do not counter sue Apple will just keep going and walk right over them. Its getting fucking stupid that Apple think they can sue their competition away.
Meanwhile, HTC is off being awesome.
[QUOTE=ThatHippyMan;32447544]Meanwhile, HTC is off being awesome.[/QUOTE] "quietly brilliant" is a brilliant slogan for HTC. They don't make a load of noise and just make awesome products. They can leave all the evangelical stuff to Apple.
[QUOTE=ThatHippyMan;32447544]Meanwhile, HTC is off being awesome.[/QUOTE] HTC is shit. Literally everyone I know with a HTC phone complains.
[QUOTE=Bytecry;32447814]HTC is shit. Literally everyone I know with a HTC phone complains.[/QUOTE] Really? EVERYONE I know with an HTC seems to love it.
[QUOTE=Bytecry;32447814]HTC is shit. Literally everyone I know with a HTC phone complains.[/QUOTE] I have had an HTC desire Z for half a year now and never had a problem. 2 friends of mine have the same one, one of them broke but it got replaced within 2 weeks. I heard the older ones break more often though.
Is it bad that I actually laugh when I see another (Apple/Samsung) bans (iPad/Galaxy) in (X country)? Really, this is just getting silly now.
What goes around comes around.
"Push me and I push back!"
[QUOTE=The golden;32443947]It's like watching 2 toddlers fight.[/QUOTE] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYEXrUwRFUI[/media] Accurate representation of their fight.
Go Samsung, kick their snobby asses! [editline]24th September 2011[/editline] Somewhat related: [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MeXQBHLIPcw[/media]
Meanwhile the Motorola Droid 3 and Asus Eee Pad Transformer are better than any of their shit and aren't banned or facing bans anywhere
Good christ, just let both fucking tablets allowed in each and every country and just stop fucking bickering.
Lavacano seeks ban of Apple and Samsung in world's courtrooms
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.