• John McCain continues to stand in the way of DADT repeal
    20 replies, posted
[url=http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_GAYS_IN_MILITARY?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2010-12-02-10-48-06]AP[/url] [img]http://hosted.ap.org/photos/1/17f25de1-c208-4895-bf54-eca9bd416a22-big.jpg[/img] [quote]A doubting John McCain led Republican opposition Thursday to letting gays serve openly in the military, sternly clashing with the Pentagon's top leaders and [b]warning that troops would quit in droves if Congress repealed the "don't ask, don't tell" law.[/b] In tense exchanges with Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, McCain and other Republicans [b]dismissed a Pentagon study on gays as biased[/b] and said objections by combat troops were being ignored. Gates and Mullen defended the study, but McCain blamed politics for pushing the matter forward during wartime. He predicted that Marines and soldiers assigned combat duties, in particular, would abandon their service if they had to serve along with gays open about their sexual orientation. McCain, R-Ariz., also said the study was flawed because it asked troops what impact repeal would have, instead of whether they wanted the law repealed at all. The study found that two-thirds of troops predicted few problems, but those who did were mostly assigned to combat roles. "We send these young people into combat," said McCain. "We think they're mature enough to fight and die. I think they're mature enough to make a judgment on who they want to serve with and the impact on their battle effectiveness." Gates shot back that asking troops if they want to serve alongside gays would amount to issuing a referendum on a policy decision that should be made by Congress or the courts. The goal of the study, he said, was to find out it if it could be done without hurting the military's ability to fight. "Are you going to ask them if they want 15-month tours? You going to ask them if they want to be part of the surge in Iraq? That's not the way our civilian-led military has ever worked in our entire history," Gates said. McCain, a four-term Republican and former Navy pilot who endured a harrowing ordeal as a prisoner of war during the Vietnam War, has taken a higher profile on socially divisive issues since losing the 2008 presidential race to Barack Obama. He has even differed with his wife, Cindy, who in a recent online video opposed the military policy and accused the government of treating gays like "second-class citizens." Frowning and lecturing Gates and other top officials who tried to defend the Obama administration's effort to repeal the gay ban, McCain scoffed at their contention that the concerns of combat troops could be addressed through time and training. His opposition foreshadows this month's Senate debate on a bill to overturn the 1993 "don't ask, don't tell" law banning gays from serving openly in the armed forces. Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., has promised a Senate vote. But Republicans have blocked previous attempts on procedural grounds. Further hurting chances of repeal is an agreement among the Senate GOP not to vote on any bill this month before addressing tax cuts and government spending. Throughout Thursday's hearing by the Senate Armed Services Committee, McCain was openly dismissive of Gates and Mullen, appearing angry and even suggesting at one point that the two leaders had failed personally because their 10-month study didn't directly ask troops whether they supported the law. "Every great leader I've ever known always consulted subordinates for their views, no matter what the issue," McCain said. Mullen took particular exception to suggestions by McCain made prior to Thursday's hearing that the Joint Chiefs chairman's opinion was less valuable because he wasn't directly commanding troops from his perch at the Pentagon. "You do not have to agree with me on this issue," Mullen said. "But don't think for one moment that I haven't carefully considered the impact of the advice I give on those who will have to live with the decisions that advice informs." Gates and Mullen on Thursday asked Congress to act as soon as possible to pre-empt further intervention from federal courts. Earlier this fall, a federal judge in California shook the Pentagon's cautious effort by ordering the department to stop enforcing the ban. For eight days, the ban was lifted, creating confusion and uncertainty among troops until an appeals court granted a stay and reasserted the policy. "Repeal of the law will not prove unacceptable risk to military readiness," Mullen told the Senate panel on Thursday. "Unit cohesion will not suffer if our units are well-led. And families will not encourage their loved ones to leave the service in droves." Each of the panel's Republicans, except repeal supporter Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, agreed with McCain that the study was flawed. Several said the 28 percent response rate was too small to be indicative of the entire force. Gen. Carter Ham, who co-chaired the study, said he was comfortable that troops who did respond were representative. Republicans also noted that combat troops were the most resistant to the change, and said retention of valuable soldiers and Marines would suffer. Nearly 60 percent of those in Marine Corps and Army combat units, such as infantry and special operations, said in the survey they thought repealing the law would hurt their units' ability to fight. Gates and Mullen noted that 92 percent of troops in the survey who believed they had served with a gay person said they never saw an impact on their units' morale or effectiveness.[/quote] McCain you idiot
McCain is clearly a closet homosexual
it's because he had a bad gay experience with a vietcong soldier dont blame him
I don't understand this any one of those soldiers could be killed by a roadside bomb out of fucking nowhere tomorrow or get sniped without warning but sharing a room with a homosexual is something they can't deal with?
How badly does that speak of our fighting forces if someone thinks they'll quit in droves just because they have to fight/live with someone they might find uncomfortable, somewhat. e: Really, does McCain not realize this is more insulting to our troops than almost anything the dreaded socialist left could say?
[QUOTE=DainBramageStudios;26461164]I don't understand this any one of those soldiers could be killed by a roadside bomb out of fucking nowhere tomorrow or get sniped without warning but sharing a room with a homosexual is something they can't deal with?[/QUOTE] idk what about sharing a closet
On my opinion of DADT: If they want to die for our country, go ahead, protect this country, nice knowing you.
[QUOTE=Zeke129;26461140]McCain is clearly a closet homosexual[/QUOTE] He's homophobic, he has a phobia for gays.
[img]http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/4295/johnmcgayn.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Mr. Scorpio;26461144]it's because he had a bad gay experience with a vietcong soldier dont blame him[/QUOTE] Nothing gayer than being locked in a cell and tortured for half a decade, right?
mccain is like 367 years old [editline]3rd December 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=O'10er;26461291]Nothing gayer than being locked in a cell and tortured for half a decade, right?[/QUOTE] no, probably not actually
[QUOTE=M_B;26461269][img_thumb]http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/4295/johnmcgayn.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE] I read that as bigot first. Congrats on the 35,000th post.
I'm just glad he isn't president.
Ugh, why does he think things still are the way they were 50 years ago? Some people can just not accept change.
[QUOTE=Jimpy;26461395]I'm just glad he isn't president.[/QUOTE]As one comedian once said, he would've been the first president that could be assassinated by a mild winter.
[QUOTE=DamagePoint;26461407]Ugh, why does he think things still are the way they were 50 years ago? Some people can just not accept change.[/QUOTE] Social conservatism = conserving society/keeping the status quo
[QUOTE=Sgt Doom;26461449]As one comedian once said, he would've been the first president that could be assassinated by a mild winter.[/QUOTE] I loled so hard i needed to barrow a air tank for a few mins
[QUOTE=Zeke129;26461465]Social conservatism = conserving society/keeping the status quo[/QUOTE] That's basically what conservatism is in general, conserving the way that things are done. If everything is changed to what current liberals want, then wouldn't they all become conservative? [editline]3rd December 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=O'10er;26461291]Nothing gayer than being locked in a cell and tortured for half a decade, right?[/QUOTE] He's just crazy
[QUOTE=Sgt Doom;26461449]As one comedian once said, he would've been the first president that could be assassinated by a mild winter.[/QUOTE] and then palin would be president aaauauuuuuuugggghghhhhhhhh [img]http://www.threadbombing.com/data/media/2/Vomit.gif[/img]
[QUOTE=Tetracycline;26461509] If everything is changed to what current liberals want, then wouldn't they all become conservative? [/QUOTE] :psyduck:
[QUOTE=Tetracycline;26461509] If everything is changed to what current liberals want, then wouldn't they all become conservative? [/QUOTE] I've also wondered about this.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.