Guy becomes only man on campus at female college and still can't get laid. Gets angry.
23 replies, posted
[url]http://jezebel.com/5416119/oh-yeah-male-student-calls-wellesley-women-bunch-of-whores[/url]
Calls the girls a 'bunch of whores' and writes a long rant on the 'fuck my life' forum.
Edit: Also of interest
Most guys at a college with 40% men 60% women ratio aren't getting laid. Reason: Girls are competing for the very top alpha males and ignoring the rest.
Roissy deals out harsh truth on the NY Times article here:
[url]http://roissy.wordpress.com/2010/02/11/is-college-a-poon-nirvana/[/url]
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("Wrong section" - Benji))[/highlight]
Quality thread
um... ok? you just post a link?
Well if they go to a school like that, then they're probably not sluts or are just lesbos.
[editline]03:16AM[/editline]
I didn't read the OP
[QUOTE=Meller Yeller;22814523]Well if they go to a school like that, then they're probably not sluts or are just lesbos.
[editline]03:16AM[/editline]
I didn't read the OP[/QUOTE]
You've never been to a same-sex school, have you?
[QUOTE=mapreader;22814468][url]http://jezebel.com/5416119/oh-yeah-male-student-calls-wellesley-women-bunch-of-whores[/url]
Calls the girls a 'bunch of whores' and writes a long rant on the 'fuck my life' forum.[/QUOTE]
That link reads out as oh yeah munch of whores.
ITT, we discuss how we munch on whores.
with my tongue, i suppose, they rarely enjoy teeth being used
This whore tastes weird.
Pass the ketchup.
[QUOTE=Mind Man;22814539]You've never been to a same-sex school, have you?[/QUOTE]
Nope. Please enlighten me.
Aren't most females these days whores?
I can't get laid! Wawawa there all whores.
[QUOTE=Meller Yeller;22814623]Nope. Please enlighten me.[/QUOTE]
Girls who attend same-sex schools can be just as slutty are whorish as the ones who go to co-ed schools. Wether or not it's co-ed has no bearing on this.
[QUOTE=Mind Man;22814756]Girls who attend same-sex schools can be just as slutty are whorish as the ones who go to co-ed schools. Wether or not it's co-ed has no bearing on this.[/QUOTE]
They're breeding grounds for lesbians, and a girls gone wild film.
[QUOTE=Meller Yeller;22814623]Nope. Please enlighten me.[/QUOTE]
Girls at same-sex schools have a notorious habit of being very promiscuous. They rely on parties to meet guys, that combined with alcohol/drugs and being deprived of male company on a day to day basis...
Golden thread. This is hilarious.
[QUOTE=hypno-toad;22814874]Girls at same-sex schools have a notorious habit of being very promiscuous. They rely on parties to meet guys, that combined with alcohol/drugs and being deprived of male company on a day to day basis...[/QUOTE]
Exactly. Sending your daughter to an all-girl Catholic school will ensure she'll be making up for lost time when she gets out. Big time (no pun intended).
Why do the 'top guys' get all the girls?
They can only have one girl at a time (unless they have an orgy) and in the time it takes for a girl to get that guy, they could have found someone else who is acually MUCH better than the 'poular' aplha-cock.
Whores... i guess they'll never learn.
[QUOTE=Mind Man;22814756]Girls who attend same-sex schools can be just as slutty are whorish as the ones who go to co-ed schools. Wether or not it's co-ed has no bearing on this.[/QUOTE]
If anything they would be more slutty due to the lack of any males.
In any case, even though this guy is an ass-hat, this website is p. much a joke. They started off by calling him a douche, said that boys can't handle single sex schools, and created the sense that females are far greater than dumb douche-y males, even though there are plenty of female bitches. What happened gaining equality? This modern-age female empowerment thing is a joke.
td;dr: The guy's a prick, the website is rubbish.
I guess it's different at my highschool. Here, we have the "Prom Queen", as everyone calls her. It's a very fitting name, as she fills that stereotype perfectly.
The system at my school is alot like a beehive. There is one queen (the "Prom Queen"), and she has lots and [b]lots[/b] of mates (random people she decides to play with).
I guess I'll need to be ready for a dramatic system change when I graduate.
[QUOTE=lolnubs;22815036]Why do the 'top guys' get all the girls?
They can only have one girl at a time (unless they have an orgy) and in the time it takes for a girl to get that guy, they could have found someone else who is acually MUCH better than the 'poular' aplha-cock.
Whores... i guess they'll never learn.[/QUOTE]
It's Roissy's belief (which you should take with a grain of salt) that women would rather compete for and share an alpha male with other women, rather than settle for a beta male.
A comment on the NY Times article itself from a grad of that college says:
[QUOTE] “The most important comment in the whole article was one female student stating that she and her friends found only 20% of the male population datable. As a UNC grad myself, I can assure any and all readers that this was indeed the viewpoint of most women at the school. I could never figure out why so many Plain Jane communications majors who couldn’t carry on an intellectual conversation if their life depended on it all thought they deserved a tall, handsome, affluent male who was headed straight to law or med school.
A significant percentage of these women are single simply because they believe they are entitled to a male in the top 20%, when they themselves are nowhere near the top 20% of females of campus.”[/QUOTE]
Also, another telling comment from a college student on Roissy's site:
[QUOTE]I go to a “public-ivy” college, which faces interesting statistics: Girls don’t want to go to colleges with a skewed ratio. But the more prestigious your college is, the more men it can attract. So the higher up towards Ivy League you go, the more males the admissions office can let in. State schools have the 60-40 problem (some in my state are as bad as 70-30) but schools like mine are closer to 46-54.
At any rate, my school is so goddamn geeky and so alpha-starved, yet even 3s and 4s have bitch-shields that need to be broken down because we have a similar shortage of attractive women.
The slightly-skewed ratio here does nothing to help, it just makes betas band together and awkwardly fuck. Meanwhile, yeah, the 10 or 20 alphas we have on a 6,000 person campus live and fuck like gods.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=lolnubs;22815036]Why do the 'top guys' get all the girls?
They can only have one girl at a time (unless they have an orgy) and in the time it takes for a girl to get that guy, they could have found someone else who is acually MUCH better than the 'poular' aplha-cock.
Whores... i guess they'll never learn.[/QUOTE]
They hardly get to see guys at all, and when they do they have unreal expectations of them. So basically they go after the guys who look the best and have the best first impressions, but once they realize how the other person really is, they break up. That's why you always see the popular guys and girls going out with different people and never staying together for more than a year.
Wait...how are they whores if they aren't putting out?
[QUOTE=woodlander;22815626]Wait...how are they whores if they aren't putting out?[/QUOTE]
I assume his line of reasoning is: If they're not sleeping with me, they must be fucking guys off campus.
Whoa, a thread linking to a Jezebel article. That's something I thought I would never see.
[quote=Date of the Jezebel article]Dec 1, 2009[/quote]
[quote=Date of the blog post]February 11, 2010[/quote]
Any particular reason why you dug up two old articles and posted them here?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.