• ATI Radeon HD 4770 Promo Video - An After Effects Test Video
    46 replies, posted
Lately I've been watching a lot of After Effects tutorials and I want to make something. Well, here it is: [hd]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlcxOI5Z7Og&hd=1[/hd] After Effects version: CS4 • Number of layers: 14 excluding layers in pre-comps • Motion blur enabled • Frame rate: 30 • Resolution: 1280x720 Render time: 7 minutes Length: 38 seconds Final editing: Sony Vegas Pro 9 The tutorial that I watched: [url]http://www.videocopilot.net/basic[/url] C&C please, I would like to improve. Thanks! [b]Edit:[/b] Oh ya, those who think that it takes too long to render this short video, here's the reason: Athlon X2 7850 (2.8 GHz). I hope to switch to Athlon II X4 soon.
very simple, i like it :)
That type of ad looks like it should play before a movie in a big theater. Or before a game at a video game expo. Very good job.
Thanks for the positive comments guys!
Simple and to the point, easy readability and effective. Good job.
I know the arrow was indeed very fitting, (it's also a cool video great job) Using stuff from videocopilot is okay(and a great start, by the way), but you should eventually be able to make your own expressions after a while. Criticism would probably be that after you introduce the card, a fast beat music tone comes up, and it montages alot of games in action sequences (like every beat) for like 30 secs, then has some cool ending :v: All in all great job dude, especially if you are just beginning
Anything that I can improve so far? [b]Edit:[/b] Didn't notice the above post. I thought about that too, maybe I should put short gameplay videos? All the stuff that are from Video Copilot are the music, the font and the arrow, that's all.
Just said :v:
Seems like something you would see at a theater before the movie came on.
I believe you meant the 4850
[QUOTE=FHamster;17347365]I believe you meant the 4850[/QUOTE] I have that just an x2, don't believe it is 100$
Good and simple. 4850 is more worth it since they are priced very closed together.
hey thats what i have
Why does everything have Parkinson's?
I think you should have made the card at the end move forward slowly, instead of shake. Otherwise, well done.
Yeah really, way too much camera shake.
[QUOTE=Pandamobile;17347858]Why does everything have Parkinson's?[/QUOTE] Because the performance is too much that the card cannot contain it. [editline]11:52AM[/editline] [QUOTE=Okeydokeyman;17348156]I think you should have made the card at the end move forward slowly, instead of shake. Otherwise, well done.[/QUOTE] Thanks, will use that advice next time.
It's great. The only minor thing I disliked was the technical specifications of it. Well, it sounds cool, but I think most of the PC users don't give a shit about it, but rather some info they can relate to shit they know about their current GPU etc. Other than, great job. It's simple yet extensive. [editline]05:05PM[/editline] [QUOTE=faolco1;17348159]Yeah really, way too much camera shake.[/QUOTE] Not quite. It was moderate, which is good as it shows that the card is so fucking awesome.
17 - 23 is bland
It was okay. There wasn't any other effects apart from the two text ones you used, the shake and that arrow. I liked it, with the music an' all, but it was a bit bland for my tastes.
I liked it all, except for the font you used.
I see someones bin hitting the ol' video copilot a little too hard eh?, good job nonetheless.
[QUOTE=Kite_shugo;17347376]I have that just an x2, don't believe it is 100$[/QUOTE] [url]http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121253[/url]
The ONLY thing that bothers me about it is the background. I think that either it should change some how, or be slowly moving somehow in any way. Everything else was good!
The ending felt a bit cut short, but aside form that it was neat :D
It took 7 mintues to render text and two pictures for 30 seconds?
I would buy BTW I have the last card in the series, which unfortunately wasn't as good as this one, I'm actually thinking of buying this one.
why is the card having a fit?
[QUOTE=Un.Hxx.Aé;17365783]It took 7 mintues to render text and two pictures for 30 seconds?[/QUOTE] 1280x720 resolution, drop shadows and [b]motion blur[/b]. [editline]05:44PM[/editline] [QUOTE=BAZ;17366109]why is the card having a fit?[/QUOTE] What do you mean?
i loved the effects the background the movement and all but i still dont agree >.>
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.