• Nirvana vs. Guns N Roses
    14 replies, posted
we all know that the '93(or '94 i forget) was the famous Nirvana vs. Guns N roses rivalry at the MTV music awards. i personally wanted nirvana. what about you guys?
Probably neither. Or Nirvana.
They both suck, but if I had to choose, I would pick Nirvana.
Nirvana, but you can't really compare the two since they're completely different kinds of music.
[QUOTE=Giant-Squid;16726627]They both suck, but if I had to choose, I would pick Nirvana.[/QUOTE] This
your name is my response
Guns N Roses i guess, Nirvana sucks
Guns. Nirvana has genius songwriting but I'm a big fan of technicality and Guns has far more than nirvana, obviously.
I'd pick Guns N' Roses. because I don't like nirvana's music. (not enough energy singer not really good and all.)
Guns N' Roses
guns n' roses. no offense to nirvana, but frankly after a couple of songs I can't stand kurt's whiny singing
Nirvana.
I hate em both.. Nirvana is a mediocre band that is remember with rose tinted glasses and Nostalgia to seem far better than they really were. Sure, they changed rock.. but it would have changed anyways. Guns and Roses is a band that just.. filled with too much ego. Axl Rose is pretty much an asshole, and I hate his voice. Slash is a douche, and is hailed as a better guitarist than he really is(I've seen far too many people call him the best guitarist alive, not jokingly). The rest of the band? What rest of the band...
Guns N' Roses
Just live with both and pick your favorite and go about your lives.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.