• Trump, once again, validates leaked intelligence in crybaby Twitter rant, telling NY Times to apolog
    74 replies, posted
[Quote] President Trump on Thursday called for The New York Times and other publications to apologize after reporting leaked information, saying the spotlight is on "low-life leakers." "Leaking, and even illegal classified leaking, has been a big problem in Washington for years," the president tweeted. "Failing @nytimes (and others) must apologize!" In a subsequent tweet, the president said those who leaked information will be caught. "The spotlight has finally been put on the low-life leakers!" he tweeted. "They will be caught!" [/Quote] [Media]https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/832197515248275456[/media] [Media]https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/832198588201594880[/media] [Url="http://thehill.com/homenews/319818-trump-calls-for-ny-times-to-apologize-leaking-has-been-big-problem-in-washington-for"]The Hill [/URL] Oh but during his campaign, WikiLeaks was wonderful and completely okay?
maybe they should apologize once he apologizes to all of the muslims and mexicans he called murderers and rapists
I love how he always has to preface any news organisation he dislikes with 'failing'. It's cute.
[QUOTE=Sobotnik;51830882]maybe they should apologize once he apologizes to all of the muslims and mexicans he called murderers and rapists[/QUOTE] Every woman he's probably molested would probably ask them to get in line first. I think that six months into his presidency (assuming he makes it that far), we'll need a list of the people he [B][I]hasn't[/I][/B] managed to insult with his childish behavior that is unbecoming of a head of state, let alone one of the most powerful countries on earth.
He must go
The hypocrisy is so thick you can cut it with a knife, spread it on some bread and make a delicious "oh god what's going on" sandwich.
President Cheeto being a massive hypocrite as always, I see.
He wouldnt be the president without leakers
I like this power struggle that trump and the media have. It encourages the media to fuck over the government every chance they get while trump and friends try to fight back only to get slaughtered. Its quite entertaining to say at the least.
Lol the president of the united states is commanding newspapers to apologize for doing their job :suicide:
This buffoon being in the Oval Office today is all the Democrat supporters' fault for not getting out to fucking vote on election day. So many states swung with such a small difference of votes had just a few hundred thousand people voted Democrat, evenly distributed among those states, Clinton would be president now. Instead we have this poor orange excuse for a "human" being complaining about "failing newspapers" and berating reporters for doing their fucking jobs, which is you know, journalism :downs:
[QUOTE=Zonesylvania;51831393]This buffoon being in the Oval Office today is all the Democrat supporters' fault for not getting out to fucking vote on election day. :[/QUOTE] Sanders you mean? Clinton was a terrible candidate. The DNC fucked up because they rather have that sweet sweet donor cash versus actually fucking winning.
[QUOTE=Zonesylvania;51831393]This buffoon being in the Oval Office today is all the Democrat supporters' fault for not getting out to fucking vote on election day. So many states swung with such a small difference of votes had just a few hundred thousand people voted Democrat, evenly distributed among those states, Clinton would be president now. Instead we have this poor orange excuse for a "human" being complaining about "failing newspapers" and berating reporters for doing their fucking jobs, which is you know, journalism :downs:[/QUOTE] So you blame non-voters more the you blame trump voters? That's pretty fucked.
[QUOTE=Guriosity;51831472]Sanders you mean? Clinton was a terrible candidate. The DNC fucked up because they rather have that sweet sweet donor cash versus actually fucking winning.[/QUOTE] She was less terrible than Trump, and furthermore, Bernie actually convinced her to go for a number of his policies. He made a compromise in an attempt to leave a legacy behind instead of his efforts going completely for nothing. As it turned out, they did end up going for nothing because the electoral college failed its purpose by letting a demagogue populist into the White House with a victory tally of -3 million votes. A tally, furthermore, that he still disputes as being impossible because most of those votes, according to him, are "fake."
I thought that Donald Trump loved leaks, golden-coloured ones from Russian prostitutes...
[QUOTE=TraderRager;51831476]So you blame non-voters more the you blame trump voters? That's pretty fucked.[/QUOTE] Less people voted this year than the past few elections
[QUOTE=Guriosity;51831472]Sanders you mean? Clinton was a terrible candidate. The DNC fucked up because they rather have that sweet sweet donor cash versus actually fucking winning.[/QUOTE] Clearly not as terrible as Trump. Clinton would have been a crappy president, but I do not imagine her telling newspapers to apologize for having their freedom of press. Or bankrupting the country on a literal wall with a once friendly nation. Or shit all over the judicial system when they decide your executive orders written right after taken office are unconstitutional.
The ballad of Shit-Gibbon continues
The absolute worse thing Clinton would have done I think is push through another AWB, but that probably wouldn't even come to fruit because she would have taken office immediately as a lame-duck president.
Trump: "Leaking is bad unless it helps me!" [QUOTE=TraderRager;51831476]So you blame non-voters more the you blame trump voters? That's pretty fucked.[/QUOTE] Democratic voters are far more likely to refrain from voting than Republicans. So he's actually not necessarily wrong to blame them. When Republicans are given a shit choice, they just default to voting for the Republican candidate even if they don't like them while Democrats fall into either feeling like their vote doesn't matter or just refuse to compromise.
[QUOTE=Emperor Scorpious II;51831661]The absolute worse thing Clinton would have done I think is push through another AWB, but that probably wouldn't even come to fruit because she would have taken office immediately as a lame-duck president.[/QUOTE] The people who don't already agree with you believe Clinton would have caused literal nuclear war.
Great, he doesn't even say they're liars or that they're fake
[QUOTE=Raidyr;51831754]The people who don't already agree with you believe Clinton would have caused literal nuclear war.[/QUOTE] But the "power and devastation is very important" to Trump
[QUOTE=Eva-1337;51830908]The hypocrisy is so thick you can cut it with a knife, spread it on some bread and make a delicious "oh god what's going on" sandwich.[/QUOTE] "Glowing 1000 Degree Knife VS Trump's Hypocrisy."
[QUOTE=Zonesylvania;51831488]She was less terrible than Trump, and furthermore, Bernie actually convinced her to go for a number of his policies. He made a compromise in an attempt to leave a legacy behind instead of his efforts going completely for nothing. As it turned out, they did end up going for nothing because the electoral college failed its purpose by letting a demagogue populist into the White House with a victory tally of -3 million votes. A tally, furthermore, that he still disputes as being impossible because most of those votes, according to him, are "fake."[/QUOTE] yes the same woman who demonized black americans in the past and also advocated for a border "barrier" is somehow better than the man that says the exact same things about different people.
[QUOTE=space1;51831899]yes the same women who demonized black americans in the past and also advocated for a border "barrier" is somehow better than the man says the exact same things about different people.[/QUOTE] Well at least Clinton has a respect for democracy.
[QUOTE=space1;51831899]yes the same women who demonized black americans in the past and also advocated for a border "barrier" is somehow better than the man says the exact same things about different people.[/QUOTE] Do you legitimately think trump is better than Hillary?
[QUOTE=space1;51831899]yes the same women who demonized black americans in the past and also advocated for a border "barrier" is somehow better than the man says the exact same things about different people.[/QUOTE] The same woman who demonized black americans and advocated for a border "barrier" [I]in the past [/I] is in fact better than the man who says the exact same things about brown people in the present.
Trump and Hillary were both shit. Americans couldn't win. I'm sorry to all my southern Neighbors.
[QUOTE=space1;51831899]yes the same women who demonized black americans in the past and also advocated for a border "barrier" is somehow better than the man says the exact same things about different people.[/QUOTE] On the other hand, Donald "I still believe they were responsible" Trump called for the execution of five innocents who were in the wrong place at the wrong time with a full page ad. Do you think he would apologize or compensate their families had they been wrongfully executed, especially considering the real crook, a Hispanic at that, surrendered to the cops?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.