Thunderf00t vs Anita Sarkeesian (women as background decoration)
144 replies, posted
[URL="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9Ju-1I1DTU"] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9Ju-1I1DTU[/URL]
[video=youtube;l9Ju-1I1DTU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9Ju-1I1DTU[/video]
Its amazing how these women are as resistant to facts and reason as fox and friends are....
[highlight](User was permabanned for this post ("it's amazing this account becomes active every time shreddinger is banned for exactly the same posts" - dai))[/highlight]
thunderf00t is hardly a creditable source that will stand up because it's the same yellow journalism that tries to contribute to social studies, but it just falters as being the same parroted crap over and over again
I hate Anita Sarkeesian as much as anyone else, but TF is awful at "destroying" her. "Here's some of the sources she lists on her website, but I gave up half way through and couldn't find a real source!" Maybe because you only looked at half of them? I'm not gonna go check myself, but im sure that's not a good precedent to set for yourself. That and most of his arguements are "She's stupid lol !!!! xxddddd". He does do a decent job of demonstrating how dumb the subject/object dichotomy is though.
[QUOTE=cumizon;45305214][URL="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pA3HP9e3PrA"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pA3HP9e3PrA[/URL]
[video=youtube;pA3HP9e3PrA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pA3HP9e3PrA[/video]
Its amazing how these women are as resistant to facts and reason as fox and friends are....[/QUOTE]
oh thank god we lost shreddinger and now we've got some new chucklehead for all our thunderfoot needs
[editline]6th July 2014[/editline]
so together that you're posting the entirely wrong vid too
[QUOTE=Ownederd;45305238]wrong link dude, and thunderf00t is hardly a creditable source that will stand up.[/QUOTE]
Link fixed, and explain where thunderf00t is wrong.
No, feelings don't count, explain factually where he goes wrong. Because as far as I can see only he manages to argue based on reason and in an honest manner, where people like sarkeesian are caught lying about their status as gamer, doctoring footage to deliberately mislead, or simply lying about things over and over again with no repercussions. Her most recent one was the most deliberate in its attempt to mislead through omission or insinuation. Like showing a woman being tied up and carried in red dead redemption, implying hes going to abuse her after when the fact is that you aren't allowed to in that game, or when the hitman throws the womans body into the dumpster, which is a standard game mechanic you can do to all bodies, but again, its used to imply the games just a woman abuse simulator because she relies on her audiences ignorance in order to make points to mislead. Thunderf00t fights against such dishonesty, and so you are going to have bring on some pretty significant evidence before you can just dismiss him out of hand.
[video=youtube;H901KdXgHs4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H901KdXgHs4[/video]
Here's his video on solar freakin roadways, again, tell me where he is wrong, and why its not "credible".
How to make popular threads on FP:
Step 1: Post the same goddamn Thunderf00t/TAA video for the 50th time.
Step 2: Watch thread views and replies go up lightning fast.
Step 3: Have your thread closed.
Step 4 (Optional): Get banned.
Hey Shreddinger glad to see you back. As for Thunderf00t, he's still my personal hero and I believe everyone should strive to be like him. Without him I wouldn't have discovered the wonderful book known as The God Delusion, and I wouldn't know how ridiculous solar roadways are.
So I've never heard of Thunderfoot, who is this guy why do yah dislike him?
[QUOTE=dragon1972;45305248]I hate Anita Sarkeesian as much as anyone else, but TF is awful at "destroying" her. "Here's some of the sources she lists on her website, but I gave up half way through and couldn't find a real source!" Maybe because you only looked at half of them? I'm not gonna go check myself, but im sure that's not a good precedent to set for yourself. That and most of his arguements are "She's stupid lol !!!! xxddddd". He does do a decent job of demonstrating how dumb the subject/object dichotomy is though.[/QUOTE]
I agree that wasn't the right thing to say, that being said, the problem is that she isn't honest by default. An academic work doesn't have ANY disreputable or unrelated citations at all. Again, try this at school or anywhere else, support your work with unrelated or just disreputable links and just claim that somewhere in there is a good one and see how people react, there simply should be none to be found. Other people have looked at her supposed sources and found them similarly wanting. She is a scam artist as such she won't make it easy for anyone to check her work. Sometimes she cites things from places which require payment, other times they aren't even academic journals. The fact is even if she cites 1 bad study that is enough to throw her work into question. Never mind her credibility. Jordanowen42 did recognize some of the studies which are the same ones gail dines relies on, which kind of tells you about the level of quality of the work is just how its probably unrelated.
[QUOTE=Manibogi;45305276]How to make popular threads on FP:
Step 1: Post the same goddamn Thunderf00t/TAA video for the 50th time.
Step 2: Watch thread views and replies go up lightning fast.
Step 3: Have your thread closed.
Step 4 (Optional): Get banned.[/QUOTE]
I feel like this is why we need twice as many video forum mods.
Ooh, also, don't forget to make every reply a mile-long paragraph.
[QUOTE=BrickInHead;45305254]oh thank god we lost shreddinger and now we've got some new chucklehead for all our thunderfoot needs
[editline]6th July 2014[/editline]
so together that you're posting the entirely wrong vid too[/QUOTE]
It's probably a fucking alt
Also thunderfoot needs to go the fuck outside and realize how the world works
internet SJW's/feminists/MRA's =/= real life people who actually stand for shit.
[QUOTE=WaffleCopter;45305299]So I've never heard of Thunderfoot, who is this guy why do yah dislike him?[/QUOTE]
He's a dude who spends more time talking about how other people know too little about the world instead of thinking of constructive ways to correct things.
He has some valid points but he goes way to far on things to the point where he can't see past his own nose.
Basically he is theamazingatheist 2.0 or most stereotypical redditor you can think of.
[QUOTE=WaffleCopter;45305299]So I've never heard of Thunderfoot, who is this guy why do yah dislike him?[/QUOTE]
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H901KdXgHs4[/media]
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3ftXinT4jI[/media]
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocV-RnVQdcs[/media]
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YeK5GI6Un8Y[/media]
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0c0QLaVLhTs[/media]
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=568iDYn8pjc[/media]
Because he debunks the dreams of stupid people, and he argues against irrationality. Whether it be fox news types, feminists like sarkeesian, or creationists/religious people. All people who exhibit the same types of immunity to facts and reason.
As we saw with solar roadways and thorium cars, even non religion people on the left aren't immune to irrationality, many of them bought the idea hook line and sinker...to the point where 2 million dollars were thrown at those con artists.
[QUOTE=Manibogi;45305276]How to make popular threads on FP
Step 1: Post the same goddamn Thunderf00t/TAA video for the 50th time.
Step 2: Watch thread views and replies go up lightning fast.
Step 3: Have your thread closed.
Step 4 (Optional): Get banned.[/QUOTE]
Its new.
[QUOTE=WaffleCopter;45305299]So I've never heard of Thunderfoot, who is this guy why do yah dislike him?[/QUOTE]
[url]http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Thunderf00t#Ongoing_crusade_against_feminism[/url]
all you need to know
[QUOTE=cumizon;45305341]Its new.[/QUOTE]
[URL="http://facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1406630"]Yeah, very new.[/URL]
[QUOTE=cumizon;45305341]
Because he debunks the dreams of stupid people, and he argues against irrationality. Whether it be fox news types, feminists like sarkeesian, or creationists/religious people. All people who exhibit the same types of immunity to facts and reason.
As we saw with solar roadways and thorium cars, even non religion people on the left aren't immune to irrationality, many of them bought the idea hook line and sinker...to the point where 2 million dollars were thrown at those con artists.[/QUOTE]
No he's a selfrightous cunt who thinks he's the center of the universe and doesn't think "Is this actually what the movement, idea, or people are standing with? or is it just some jerkoff on the internet being an idiot".
Also isn't if funny to anyone else that when shreddinger's account got banned or something the cumming guy went active? [url]http://facepunch.com/search.php?searchid=5041393[/url]
[QUOTE=Ownederd;45305345][url]http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Thunderf00t#Ongoing_crusade_against_feminism[/url]
all you need to know[/QUOTE]
All you need to know is that people who couldn't argue him honestly resorted to smearing him on websites during the atheism + split where social justice warriors tried to take over atheism. These people aren't willing to engage in honest debate, and their underhanded tactics are well documented. They are the types to rely on posting smears on such sites and censoring inconvenient comments or just banning posters from whatever site they control.
[URL]http://freethoughtblogs.com/dispatches/2012/07/01/major-changes-at-freethought-blogs/[/URL]
oh shit lmao
[QUOTE=cumizon;45305376]All you need to know is that people who couldn't argue him honestly resorted to smearing him on websites during the atheism + split where social justice warriors tried to take over atheism. These people aren't willing to engage in honest debate, and their underhanded tactics are well documented. They are the types to rely on posting smears on such sites and censoring inconvenient comments or just banning posters from whatever site they control.[/QUOTE]
tbh i'm not going to take a guy seriously who drones on the same strawmans
[QUOTE=Ownederd;45305382][URL]http://freethoughtblogs.com/dispatches/2012/07/01/major-changes-at-freethought-blogs/[/URL]
oh shit lmao
[/QUOTE]
What a bunch of assholes. Thunderf00t is a gentleman and doesn't need them.
[QUOTE=JohnFisher89;45305364]No he's a selfrightous cunt who thinks he's the center of the universe and doesn't think "Is this actually what the movement, idea, or people are standing with? or is it just some jerkoff on the internet being an idiot".
Also isn't if funny to anyone else that when shreddinger's account got banned or something the cumming guy went active? [url]http://facepunch.com/search.php?searchid=5041393[/url][/QUOTE]
Ah in true social justice warrior fashion, trying to get personal when all you probably cry about is bullying:rolleyes:
You can try all you want to link me to that guy, whoever he is, but you will fail. Not that its a legitimate thing to bring up in the first place, but that's the point. People like thunderf00t argue based on reason, you have nothing, so you throw fits, call him names, and attack people, which are just things which are illegitimate by default.
from now on everyone just report these god awful threads
ive done my part so if someone else reports the op maybe hell get a good kick in the ass
[QUOTE=cumizon;45305376]All you need to know is that people who couldn't argue him honestly resorted to smearing him on websites during the atheism + split where social justice warriors tried to take over atheism. These people aren't willing to engage in honest debate, and their underhanded tactics are well documented. They are the types to rely on posting smears on such sites and censoring inconvenient comments or just banning posters from whatever site they control.[/QUOTE]
Does anyone care about this, really? The answer is No. fuck off.
[QUOTE=seano12;45305389]What a bunch of assholes. Thunderf00t is a gentleman and doesn't need them.[/QUOTE]
are you actually for real. thunderf00t tried to get back in by exploiting malicious loopholes
[URL]http://freethoughtblogs.com/dispatches/2012/08/10/thunderfoots-unethical-obsession/[/URL]
[QUOTE=cumizon;45305392]Ah in true social justice warrior fashion, trying to get personal when all you probably cry about is bullying:rolleyes:
You can try all you want to link me to that guy, whoever he is, but you will fail. Not that its a legitimate thing to bring up in the first place, but that's the point. People like thunderf00t argue based on reason, you have nothing, so you throw fits, call him names, and attack people, which are just things which are illegitimate by default.[/QUOTE]
all you say is "thunderf00t argues like a pro" with no reason over and over. the question is: can you actually address why are people criticizing you without going "gosh darn sjw" or "he's really smart!"
[QUOTE=Ownederd;45305382][URL]http://freethoughtblogs.com/dispatches/2012/07/01/major-changes-at-freethought-blogs/[/URL]
oh shit lmao
tbh i'm not going to take a guy seriously who drones on the same strawmans[/QUOTE]
"lol", he got thrown out as a heretic by people who claimed to be free thought atheists, but started taking on aspects of dogmatic religion. As we all know, religions have a habit of smearing heretics as not just wrong, but immoral people. Furthermore its their only move because they can't actually win based on reasonable arguments. That's what thunderf00t fights against, like it or not he documents his "fights" against such people in his other videos and they don't come off well, they have become very prone to dishonesty, no different than anita sarkeesian. Truth no longer matters when atheists become social justice warriors or feminists. That is no "free thought blog" when they ban people for disagreement, so stop being so naïve.
[QUOTE=cumizon;45305419]"lol", he got thrown out as a heretic by people who claimed to be free thought atheists, but started taking on aspects of dogmatic religion. As we all know, religions have a habit of smearing heretics as not just wrong, but immoral people. That's what thunderf00t fights against, like it or not he documents his "fights" against such people in his other videos and they don't come off well, they have become very prone to dishonesty, no different than anita sarkeesian. Truth no longer matters when atheists become social justice warriors or feminists.[/QUOTE]
like i just said, you're parroting the same thing over and over. i'll be surprised if anyone takes you seriously
[QUOTE=cumizon;45305419]"lol", he got thrown out as a heretic by people who claimed to be free thought atheists, but started taking on aspects of dogmatic religion. As we all know, religions have a habit of smearing heretics as not just wrong, but immoral people. Furthermore its their only move because they can't actually win based on reasonable arguments. That's what thunderf00t fights against, like it or not he documents his "fights" against such people in his other videos and they don't come off well, they have become very prone to dishonesty, no different than anita sarkeesian. Truth no longer matters when atheists become social justice warriors or feminists. That is no "free thought blog" when they ban people for disagreement, so stop being so naïve.[/QUOTE]
Are you related to Shreddinger or something? Dear lord.
[QUOTE=cumizon;45305392]Ah in true social justice warrior fashion, trying to get personal when all you probably cry about is bullying:rolleyes:
You can try all you want to link me to that guy, whoever he is, but you will fail. Not that its a legitimate thing to bring up in the first place, but that's the point. People like thunderf00t argue based on reason, you have nothing, so you throw fits, call him names, and attack people, which are just things which are illegitimate by default.[/QUOTE]
I actually don't like SJW's at all, but I know the difference between someone who spends too much time infront of a PC and who actualy goes OUTSIDE and interacts with society. Thunderf00t reminds me of people I know, who never go outside and meet society which thinks anyone rationally. They think tumblr and twitter represents the world, which it doesn't.
If people thought how thunderf00t projected no women would work in the world, everyone would be a zombie eating mcdonalds, and weigh 800 pounds.
[QUOTE=Ownederd;45305415]are you actually for real. thunderf00t tried to get back in by exploiting malicious loopholes
[URL]http://freethoughtblogs.com/dispatches/2012/08/10/thunderfoots-unethical-obsession/[/URL]
all you say is "thunderf00t argues like a pro" with no reason over and over. the question is: can you actually address why are people criticizing you without going "gosh darn sjw" or "he's really smart!"[/QUOTE]
All in the past my friend. Thunderf00t is too good for them. He is a wizard beyond measure.
[QUOTE=cumizon;45305419]"lol", he got thrown out as a heretic by people who claimed to be free thought atheists, but started taking on aspects of dogmatic religion. As we all know, religions have a habit of smearing heretics as not just wrong, but immoral people. Furthermore its their only move because they can't actually win based on reasonable arguments. That's what thunderf00t fights against, like it or not he documents his "fights" against such people in his other videos and they don't come off well, they have become very prone to dishonesty, no different than anita sarkeesian. Truth no longer matters when atheists become social justice warriors or feminists. That is no "free thought blog" when they ban people for disagreement, so stop being so naïve.[/QUOTE]
I want to believe this is satire and some joke, that people don't actually think this assholic about people having their own opinions about things...
[QUOTE=cumizon;45305419]"lol", he got thrown out as a heretic by people who claimed to be free thought atheists, but started taking on aspects of dogmatic religion. As we all know, religions have a habit of smearing heretics as not just wrong, but immoral people. Furthermore its their only move because they can't actually win based on reasonable arguments. That's what thunderf00t fights against, like it or not he documents his "fights" against such people in his other videos and they don't come off well, they have become very prone to dishonesty, no different than anita sarkeesian. Truth no longer matters when atheists become social justice warriors or feminists. That is no "free thought blog" when they ban people for disagreement, so stop being so naïve.[/QUOTE]
You know how people complain about these SJWs for being dismissive, holier-than-thou and having a firm belief in intangible things like moral superiority?
You're doing the same thing, except substituting in truth and logic as if such a thing as perfect truth exists. It makes you look like a massive tool and you're hurting the cause a lot more than helping.
[QUOTE=cumizon;45305419]"lol", he got thrown out as a heretic by people who claimed to be free thought atheists, but started taking on aspects of dogmatic religion. As we all know, religions have a habit of smearing heretics as not just wrong, but immoral people. Furthermore its their only move because they can't actually win based on reasonable arguments. That's what thunderf00t fights against, like it or not he documents his "fights" against such people in his other videos and they don't come off well, they have become very prone to dishonesty, no different than anita sarkeesian. Truth no longer matters when atheists become social justice warriors or feminists. That is no "free thought blog" when they ban people for disagreement, so stop being so naïve.[/QUOTE]
Thank god we have people like thunderf00t who stands up against the evil women of the world to protect us poor mistreated males.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.