[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFduts6Cp_g&feature=feedu[/media]
DOES EVERY GAME NEEDS IRONSIGHTS?
Fuck ironsights, also that vibrator at the end :D
Stop comparing this shit to Call of Duty! Stop saying Call of Duty is better! Fuck IGN!
Good I dont want a CoD rehash.
Haha so it's like a mindless killing game with humour thrown in
[QUOTE=Derkaderk;27988680]Haha so it's like a mindless killing game with humour thrown in[/QUOTE]
Just like it should be.
Hurr call of duty hurr halo how can it compete?
I'm one of the people who doesn't mind the Call of Duty franchise but even I find the videos comparing it to COD annoying.
"The era of CoD and Halo"
Shut the FUCK up, IGN.
What's wrong with ironsights? You always bitch about autoaim and ironsights are more accurate than just firing from the hip.
there's no ironsights what are you talking about
did you even listen to what it said
Wow,IGN is horrible.
Comparing it to COD...that's fucking stupid.
Everything I've seen and read about this game is just what I expected. And it is as it should be!
fuck IGN, who needs halo when you have a vibrator?
HOW CAYN DIS GAEM COMPAER TO MODARN WARFUR AN HALO!!111one!!1
''you wanna touch it, don't you?''
[QUOTE=BrickInHead;27989124]there's no ironsights what are you talking about
did you even listen to what it said[/QUOTE]
[quote=IGN]Gearbox stubbornly resist to use new innovations such as ironsights[/quote]
There's only one thing that I need to know...
[B]WHERE IS THE MIGHTY BOOT?[/B]
That was like the stupidest preview I have ever heard. Let's compare this sub-genre to another sub-genre.
i'm ok if IGN jsut said they resist to use these "new innovations"
but really?
to say STUBBORNLY
[QUOTE=Matrix374;27989344][/QUOTE]
Yeah you just made a tool of yourself.
Only thing that is an "advancement" is regenerating health (for singleplayer games), the rest is just something that is reserved for military shooters.
"Why are they showing a prop spazzing out at the end?
Is that a... Ahh that explains it."
IGNorant
~game journalism expertise~
I DONT SEE THIS GAME COMPETEING WITH THIS YEARS CALL OF DUTY 9 BECAUSE IT DOESNT HAVE IRONSIGHTS
[QUOTE=Matrix374;27989403]i'm ok if IGN jsut said they resist to use these "new innovations"
but really?
to say STUBBORNLY[/QUOTE]
They're gamers who expect ironsights in every game, that's why everybody hates them. You can't compare an original game such as good 'ole Duke Nukem to Call of Duty, if you do, you may as well dig yourself a hole, and shoot yourself.
[QUOTE=clanratc;27989474]Only thing that is an "advancement" is regenerating health (for singleplayer games), the rest is just something that is reserved for military shooters.[/QUOTE]
I wouldn't call it an advancement, it's simply a choice made by the devs.
Hahhhahahhhaa
this is the same guy that did the dead space 2 review
[URL]http://ps3.ign.com/articles/114/1145331p1.html[/URL]
His opinion is null and void
[QUOTE=Wii60;27989676]Hahhhahahhhaa
this is the same guy that did the dead space 2 review
[URL]http://ps3.ign.com/articles/114/1145331p1.html[/URL]
His opinion is null and void[/QUOTE]
lol
'Is finishing up a 14 year old game such a good idea, especially in the era of Call of Duty and Halo?'
this guy is fucking retarded
[QUOTE=Merijn;27989669]I wouldn't call it an advancement, it's simply a choice made by the devs.[/QUOTE]
No it's an advancement. It lets devs always know how much health the player will have at the start of an encounter, therefor can design them better. It also doesn't make you have to restart a level because some mistake that made you lose a bunch of health in the middle of a fight.
The downside to regenerating health is that it removes a lot of the exploration you had to do in earlier games, good designers will add other things you can find by exploring though.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.