• Apple vs Samsung jury has reached a verdict
    5 replies, posted
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/dGr9qZ1.jpg[/IMG] [QUOTE]So far Samsung has been found to have violated at least one patent by the jury. [B]Specifically the ’647 patent which covers data detectors, all accused Samsung devices were found to be in violation.[/B] Patents 959 - which covers universal search – and 414 – involving background syncing – was where Samsung picked up some good news and none of its devices were found to have infringed. [B]However, on patent 721 which involves the slide to unlock feature, the jury was mixed finding that some of the Samsung devices did infringe on Apple while others did not.[/B] Not everything was bad news for Samsung today, however. [B]Apple was indeed found to have violated Samsung’s patent 449 in regards to cameras and folder organization.[/B] The jury awarded the company $158,400 in damages. [/QUOTE] [B]Source(s):[/B] [url]http://www.technobuffalo.com/2014/05...amsung-ruling/[/url] [url]http://www.theverge.com/2014/5/2/5676776/samsung-found-to-infringe-apple-patents-for-over-119-million-in[/url]
Still waiting for those patent reforms.
My apology for jumping the train again. I have some issues with updating the thread. Everytime I click the edit button I just get a white blank field and have to redo everything.
is that vs in Street Fighter IV font?
[QUOTE=The Baconator;44709631]is that vs in Street Fighter IV font?[/QUOTE] Oh no time to sue
"Some of your phones slide to the right to unlock [i]just like ours[/i]! We're going to sue you, you [i]dirty idea thief[/i]!" I hate this shit
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.