• Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows - Official Trailer
    39 replies, posted
[video=youtube;lNxhpNpnAkk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNxhpNpnAkk[/video]
You remember when Sherlock Holmes was a detective?
Aww Yeah!
[QUOTE=gt118;31081294]Aww Yeah![/QUOTE] Avatar suspiciously fits.
Is this a good thing, or is it a bad thing?
I don't recall the Sherlock Holmes stories having much action.
American film industry at it again alright.
I know what Im asking Santa for this christmas.
:dance:
Looks like it has too much action again.
[QUOTE=Gekkosan;31081605]American film industry at it again alright.[/QUOTE] i know the film industry is kicking ass but you don't need to ride their dick about it jeez man contain yourself
I enjoyed the first one and hope this one is even better. And at least it isn't ridiculous like the modern Three Musketeers movie.
The first one was good. Looking forward to this
So why did they get rid of the love interest from the first?
I know it's not exactly same as the stories but the first movie was very entertaining and this one looks too. And I really enjoy Downey.
hell yeah another explosive slow-mo scene with stuff flying all over the place :D
As a fan of the books these are weird, but not as weird as the TV series "Sherlock" from 2010.
[QUOTE=mac338;31087580]As a fan of the books these are weird, but not as weird as the TV series "Sherlock" from 2010.[/QUOTE] I agree, the first movie was quite interesting though. Also check out the The hound of the Baskervilles from 1959.The casting is amazing. Peter Cushing as Sherlock and Christopher Lee as Henry Baskerville.
This looks awesome. I'm a fan of the books, the Jeremy Brett series, Sherlock and these movies. These movies stress on the action theme a bit more, but I really don't see the problem - I still love it. Can't wait!
[QUOTE=mac338;31087580]As a fan of the books these are weird, but not as weird as the TV series "Sherlock" from 2010.[/QUOTE] I thought Sherlock was pretty good apart from the second episode. Edit: Yay 1,000th post
By the way, at the beginning I think Downey has that Tony Stark look to him. At least the beard seems like it.
This time they are on a quest to find black people in the first movie. THINK ABOUT IT.
he looks sexy in makeup
December, so far away. :(
[QUOTE=thrawn2787;31083139]So why did they get rid of the love interest from the first?[/QUOTE] Rachel Mcadams? She has a cameo in this
Where's Stephen Fry? He's supposed to play Mycroft Holmes in this, isn't he?
Wow really I never thought they'd make another one. I don't get it the director and the cast are all capable of making a smarter film why do they turn it into a corny action flick. [editline]13th July 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=SpasticPinoy;31082987]And at least it isn't ridiculous like the modern Three Musketeers movie.[/QUOTE]Yeah it's just SLIGHTLY less ridiculous.
How all the letters where coming together I was expecting it to be 3D Thank god its not
[QUOTE=MasterG;31090844]This is simply another interpretation[/QUOTE] Yeah one that's disappointingly stupid and can be so much better considering what they have.
[QUOTE=Tunak Mk. II;31082312]i know the film industry is kicking ass but you don't need to ride their dick about it jeez man contain yourself[/QUOTE] I didn't say it was a bad thing necessarily. But I've grown tired of all the special effects and the millions burned into making these flicks.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.