• Testostacular! Battlefield 3 In-Game Footage
    163 replies, posted
[url]http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RockPaperShotgun/~3/YdDCr1Ow7zo/[/url]
Awww yeeaaahh :snoop:
Looks great!
Looks promising, but why are they showing off singleplayer footage? Nobody gives a fuck about the singleplayer.
im moist with ampristiamtion
Oh God, this looks great.
Looks... scripted!
It looks better than Crysis 2 :iia:
Ingame footage recorded on a pc instead of a fucking console as they usually do. Looks promising so far.
The gunplay actually looks rather boring, to be honest.
Awesome engine, its right up there with the source and unreal engines.
Those animations!
When I saw the WASD key I was happy. There aren't many games shown using PC footage these days.
I beat them to it.
not a big fan of the running in this game
[QUOTE=D4RkHaZz;28380133]Looks promising, but why are they showing off singleplayer footage? Nobody gives a fuck about the singleplayer.[/QUOTE] MP is a big focus but they're trying to show the singleplayer isn't what we're used to This actually looks good. Very tight.
Looks sexy.
hands look kinda retarded,also feels kinda like...you know,fov is in your face,kinda console like,I hope I'm wrong,SP seems too much cliche,but what can you do if all the writers write the same shit all over again,right?
Game itself looks beautiful but the combat mechanics didn't look good at all.
It showed him aiming down the sights and shooting at people. How does it "not look good at all" if it's like that in just about every other FPS?
Looking very awesome, looks pretty intense and fun.
Looks fantastic, the animations and immersiveness look fucking unbelievable.
[QUOTE=nVidia;28380265]Ingame footage recorded on a pc instead of a fucking console as they usually do. Looks promising so far.[/QUOTE] I was totally surprised. [QUOTE=PopLot]The gunplay actually looks rather boring, to be honest. [/QUOTE] I have to agree. It looks like another generic shooter.
[QUOTE=-n3o-;28380280]Awesome engine, its right up there with the source and unreal engines.[/QUOTE] I'm sorry but the source engine isn't 'up there', hasn't been for a long time now.
[QUOTE=overdark;28380846]I'm sorry but the source engine isn't 'up there', hasn't been for a long time now.[/QUOTE] [img]http://www.pcgamersworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/ss_8a772608d29ffd56ac013d2ac7c4388b96e87a21.1920x1080.jpg[/img] What's not beautiful about that?
[QUOTE=stewe231;28380925][img_thumb]http://www.pcgamersworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/ss_8a772608d29ffd56ac013d2ac7c4388b96e87a21.1920x1080.jpg[/img_thumb] What's not beautiful about that?[/QUOTE] Sligthly low resolution textures and not enough polygons for todays standards?
OhgodIjustcreamedmypantsohgodtheressomeoneoutsidemyroomsigningou
Looks like MoH.
[QUOTE=stewe231;28380925][img_thumb]http://www.pcgamersworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/ss_8a772608d29ffd56ac013d2ac7c4388b96e87a21.1920x1080.jpg[/img_thumb] What's not beautiful about that?[/QUOTE] In terms of tech Source will remain outdated because of the fundamentals it's based on. Doesn't mean it can't look pretty in its own way. [editline]2nd March 2011[/editline] BF3 seems to be setting a new standard for immersion. Now I just want footage of the new destructible environments :saddowns:
They better not disappoint us with this game. I have high hopes.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.