i came across this when looking around to see if anybody else had any research/experiment with tachyon particles in regards to computers and fiber optics
this is pretty interesting
[video=youtube;0a_FxQU05b0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0a_FxQU05b0[/video]
[video] [url]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEBSmi8zRjQ[/url][/video]
I have something better, it's called a 'Cellular regeneration and entertainment chamber'
[editline]30th May 2015[/editline]
[QUOTE=Aircraft;47843554]Dude, tachyons by definition cannot do anything that is described in the videos posted. Let alone the fact that a tachyonic particles haven't been found, or have any evidence, rhyme, or reason to exist outside of the original thought experiment. Considering this account's posting history over the past few months, I'm pretty sure its a troll.[/QUOTE]
basically what you're saying is since it is hypothetical and hasn't been proven yet it technically does not exist so the effects does not exist etc etc
and then you think im trolling
[editline]30th May 2015[/editline]
[QUOTE=Craptasket;47843561]I have something better, it's called a 'Cellular regeneration and entertainment chamber'[/QUOTE]
haha interesting
There's a joke in there somewhere. Hypothetical particles that travel faster than light saving your grapes, hah!
-
[QUOTE=Craptasket;47843561]I have something better, it's called a 'Cellular regeneration and entertainment chamber'[/QUOTE]
Careful with that kind of thinking or the soulless minions of orthodoxy are gonna be out to get you
[QUOTE=justin gurel;47843573][editline]30th May 2015[/editline]
basically what you're saying is since it is hypothetical and hasn't been proven yet it technically does not exist so the effects does not exist etc etc
and then you think im trolling
[editline]30th May 2015[/editline]
haha interesting[/QUOTE]
Making grapes rot slower is detectable.
Tachyons have not been detected
A+B=this is bullshit
TAKYON
[QUOTE=Aircraft;47843647]No, what I mean is that by definition, a tachyon cannot be utilized because it cannot be detected. A tachyon exists only as to explain what with our current knowledge how matter faster than the speed of light would behave, if it could exist, and if you took the time to look it up, you would see why it would be impossible to even detect one, at least with the technology and understanding of physics we have today.
Also yes considering your past blatant ignorance of other people's arguments and disjointed/incoherent posting I think you're a troll.[/QUOTE]
well according to his video he was able to utilize it and yeah to my knowledge i dont think we have any instruments to detect it precisely we just seen effects...hopefully we can detect a gravitational field that can put us on a good road to look further into.
listen aircraft this is new stuff take it easy
-
[QUOTE=justin gurel;47843751]well according to his video he was able to utilize it and yeah to my knowledge i dont think we have any instruments to detect it precisely we just seen effects...hopefully we can detect a gravitational field that can put us on a good road to look further into.
listen aircraft this is new stuff take it easy[/QUOTE]
If we could see the effects, that would be detecting it, and the scientific community would be all over that.
I'm all for pseudo-science if it at least kinda makes sense, since yeah there's always a tiny chance the scientific community missed something, and it's usually harmless speculation. This [I]really[/I] doesn't make sense at all, and you'd know that if you took the time to look into it.
yeah the ability to look into the future is what keeps me guessing,i keep telling my self that's not possible
it's just that in textbook terms to get a reading on its effect on gravitation field would mean you would have to read it's mass yet we have negitave mass squared...
i then think about warp fields
[QUOTE=justin gurel;47843751]well according to his video he was able to utilize it and yeah to my knowledge i dont think we have any instruments to detect it precisely we just seen effects...hopefully we can detect a gravitational field that can put us on a good road to look further into.
listen aircraft this is new stuff take it easy[/QUOTE]
It's not even about detecting tachyons. These discs supposedly radiate them, meaning that these guys somehow not only have the ability to create them, but to do some process to some material that causes them to be constantly created.
[QUOTE=Aircraft;47843785]New stuff? these videos are several years old. Because definition isn't quite enough to shoot this down, being able to harness tachyons would change everything, as being able to detect a tachyon would mean we could transmit information faster than the speed of light, which from our current view of the world breaks everything. Its implications are tremendous, but a tachyon would do nothing to slow the aging of a grape. Nor would anyone be concerned enough to slow the aging of a grape when ftl travel, and an infinite observable universe would all be in reach.
Since you don't seem to have a full grasp of why this is, I suggest you read this: [URL]http://rd11.web.cern.ch/RD11/rkb/PH14pp/node26.html[/URL][/QUOTE]
yeah i was reading up on that earlier when i was looking into tachyons and its reaction makes sense mechanically
-
They are also quite useful in deep space....
[video=youtube;ShCV_JhBSbo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShCV_JhBSbo[/video]
[QUOTE=justin gurel;47843825]yeah i was reading up on that earlier when i was looking into tachyons and its reaction makes sense mechanically[/QUOTE]
Look, for all we know, the discs actually do keep grapes fresh. Sure, why not; it's stupidly implausible but lets just assume it works. You just can't assume it's tachyons doing it, for no other reason than "mysterious powers".
Nothing about tachyons, from how they're hypothetically formed to how they hypothetically behave would give you a reason to assume they're behind what's happening.
If these things really worked (once again, probably not), I'd peg some sort of undiscovered form of energy before I even [I]thought[/I] of making the wild leap to tachyons, and even that would be a terrible assumption to make.
[QUOTE=justin gurel;47843815]yeah the ability to look into the future is what keeps me guessing,i keep telling my self that's not possible
it's just that in textbook terms to get a reading on its effect on gravitation field would mean you would have to read it's mass yet we have negitave mass squared...
i then think about warp fields[/QUOTE]
Are you schizophrenic or something?
[editline]31st May 2015[/editline]
[QUOTE=Aircraft;47843839]No it doesn't, not in relation to the videos you just posted.[/QUOTE]
as in speed and etc,how tachyons react to cherenkov radiation
[editline]31st May 2015[/editline]
how ever what we know about light and gravity isent all that true either...but ionno because everything contradicts each other.
If tachyons exist, they are infinitely fast and infinitely close to massless.
They shouldn't react with anything because they've already crossed the universe twice since you started reading this sentence.
They don't do shit for your grapes. Or react to Cherenkov radiation what does that even mean you are babbling nonsense
Basically everything he said is pure BS.
Im pretty damn sure that the concept of zero point energy does not arise from a field that is present everywhere, rather it originates from the theory that any quantum mechanical system has energy in its ground state. An example is that if you somehow cooled something like liquid helium down to absolute zero it would still have energy.
It also theorizes that even if you had a vacuum, with no particles present, there is still energy there because the fields that we DO know perpetuate space (electromagnetic field, gauge fields, the like) have energy associated with them even in their ground state (vacuum energy).
In a nutshell, its a theory that as far as temperature and vacuums go, nothing really isnt nothing.
And he is saying tachyons are supposed to be the quantum particle associated with this field? lel
im talking about its behavior according to. and yes the more energy it looses the more it accelerates
[editline]31st May 2015[/editline]
maybe we can see its ghost when it breaks past the threshold
[editline]31st May 2015[/editline]
[QUOTE=justin gurel;47843953]im talking about its behavior according to. and yes the more energy it looses the more it accelerates
[editline]31st May 2015[/editline]
maybe we can see its ghost when it breaks past the threshold[/QUOTE]
yee nvm theres a gif on wiki about that
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
