Everything Wrong With Shrek 2 In 18 Minutes Or Less
33 replies, posted
[video]https://youtu.be/W8D6dnIzMhc[/video]
Excuse me but Shrek 2 is a perfect film
For fucksake...He doesn't even go after actual movie mistakes...
Shrek 2 is legit one of my favorite films of all time. This video has attacked me on a personal level.
[QUOTE=Uber22;52651480]For fucksake...He doesn't even go after actual movie mistakes...[/QUOTE]
Well the series isn't meant to be taken seriously.
Shrek 4 was better than this video.
[QUOTE=Tuskin;52651555]Well the series isn't meant to be taken seriously.[/QUOTE]
[video=youtube;jp9LWZ1C0jw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jp9LWZ1C0jw[/video]
Actually he did point out actual mistakes in film, and then occasional throw in a joke here and there.
Now its just shitty jokes the whole time for the lulz
[QUOTE=Tuskin;52651555]Well the series isn't meant to be taken seriously.[/QUOTE]
You keep posting those videos and defending them in the same way despite it being clear that most of Facepunch actually despises them.
Why?
[QUOTE=Damjen;52651674]You keep posting those videos and defending them in the same way despite it being clear that most of Facepunch actually despises them.
Why?[/QUOTE]
And Facepunch isn't a hive mind.
There are probably people watching these and enjoying them, but are not posting because they'd get shit on.
I also haven't posted one of these videos in almost 2 years.
[QUOTE=Damjen;52651674]You keep posting those videos and defending them in the same way despite it being clear that most of Facepunch actually despises them.
Why?[/QUOTE]
Somebody once told him the site was gonna hate them, but he ain't the sharpest tool in the shed.
An interesting video relating to CinemaSins
[video=youtube;qnTZbZw1JPQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnTZbZw1JPQ[/video]
[QUOTE=buu342;52652033]An interesting video relating to CinemaSins
[video=youtube;qnTZbZw1JPQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnTZbZw1JPQ[/video][/QUOTE]
That was pretty glorious.
[QUOTE=Tuskin;52651711]And Facepunch isn't a hive mind.
There are probably people watching these and enjoying them, but are not posting because they'd get shit on.
I also haven't posted one of these videos in almost 2 years.[/QUOTE]
Sorry about your relapse, addiction is a nasty thing. Don't be afraid to seek professional help at a rehab if you must.
Jokes aside, I like the serious videos much more. The one where he makes shitty jokes really fast every half second is kind of obnoxious.
Also shit talk of shrek is blasphemy.
[QUOTE=Tuskin;52651555]Well the series isn't meant to be taken seriously.[/QUOTE]
Why is that always the fallback when the video is shit?
[QUOTE=Tuskin;52651711]And Facepunch isn't a hive mind.
There are probably people watching these and enjoying them, but are not posting because they'd get shit on.
I also haven't posted one of these videos in almost 2 years.[/QUOTE]
I know FP isn't a hivemind but there is literally not one single positive rating on the OP
CinemaSins hasn't been decent in a long time imo, the spinoffs by different people are better, like CinemaWins. Half the time the things he points out aren't even problems, let alone little gags and running in-jokes, they're just flat out non-issues or even something genuinely positive sometimes and it always irks the hell outta me.
[Editline]skdkcn[/editline]
Also, "it's not meant to be taken seriously" is a dumb as shit defense, comedy isn't supposed to be taken seriously but it can still be shit, it doesn't put it above criticism. You don't have to be a cook to know the food is bad.
[QUOTE=Tuskin;52651711]And Facepunch isn't a hive mind.
There are probably people watching these and enjoying them, but are not posting because they'd get shit on.
I also haven't posted one of these videos in almost 2 years.[/QUOTE]
Game Theory: Electric Boogaloo, here it comes :v:
[QUOTE=Tuskin;52651711]And Facepunch isn't a hive mind.[/QUOTE]
You can only push this phrase so far to justify your shitty opinions
[QUOTE=buu342;52652033]An interesting video relating to CinemaSins
[video=youtube;qnTZbZw1JPQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qnTZbZw1JPQ[/video][/QUOTE]
I came in here hoping notbob had a response to the Shrek one.
His videos probably take shit tons of time to make and don't reach enough people to really make it worth it. Despite them being absolutely great.
[QUOTE=Tuskin;52651555]Well the series isn't meant to be taken seriously.[/QUOTE]
[B]Abstract:[/B]
This is the horseshit excuse CinemaSins provides, but it's a bold-headed lie.
[B]Findings:[/B]
Ironically his own "serious" reviews in his car are evidence that his "humor" claims are bullshit and they're his actual opinions, which are 90% of the time factually incorrect statements because he missed dialog from five seconds previous to a "sin". You can watch it get pointed out multiple times in the Everything Wrong With CinemaSins videos.
[B]Conclusions:[/B]
CinemaSins is an intellectually dishonest fuckboy who hides behind "its humor" to shield the glaring fact that he must be looking at his phone through entire movies.
[QUOTE=DeVotchKa;52654989]CinemaSins hasn't been decent in a long time imo, the spinoffs by different people are better, like CinemaWins. Half the time the things he points out aren't even problems, let alone little gags and running in-jokes, they're just flat out non-issues or even something genuinely positive sometimes and it always irks the hell outta me.
[Editline]skdkcn[/editline]
Also, "it's not meant to be taken seriously" is a dumb as shit defense, comedy isn't supposed to be taken seriously but it can still be shit, it doesn't put it above criticism. You don't have to be a cook to know the food is bad.[/QUOTE]
bobvids and Shawn & Jen also demonstrated that it's not actually "satire" -- the guy has a "serious discussion in the car after seeing the movie" series, where he makes [i]the exact same stupid complaints[/i] that make their way into his CinemaSins videos. Including the "sins" that aren't actually "sins" and it's painfully obvious he just missed something glaringly obvious because he wasn't paying attention during the movie.
"dumb CinemaSins video" cliche... ex machina :vs:
[editline]7th September 2017[/editline]
wow ninja'd
Shrek 1 and 2 are great films and I'll fight any fucker that says otherwise. They lost the magic when they got to 3.
[QUOTE=RainbowStalin;52658242]Shrek 1 and 2 are great films and I'll fight any fucker that says otherwise. They lost the magic when they got to 3.[/QUOTE]
Shrek the turd
[QUOTE=Tuskin;52651555]Well the series isn't meant to be taken seriously.[/QUOTE]
If its supposed to be a joke then the videos are terrible because none of it is funny
If its supposed to be serious the videos are terrible because the nitpicks are shit and mostly invalid
Cinemasins sux
[QUOTE=Tuskin;52651555]Well the series isn't meant to be taken seriously.[/QUOTE]
That doesn't excuse it from being bad.
[QUOTE=Tuskin;52651555]Well the series isn't meant to be taken seriously.[/QUOTE]
this is what people use to defend game theory
I subscribe to the idea of using "isn't meant to be taken seriously" for EWW generally but it only works to such an extreme limit these days
I always thought CinemaSins entire jist was pointing out small details and oversights that don't actually make a difference to the movie's quality at all (or pointing out plotholes/odd reasoning behind actions). I think he's been memeing it up recently but I haven't looked at his recent videos, but they're not meant to be serious in the slightest. It's not some excuse to pardon bad quality, the channel's just literally never been that serious, it's pretty evident in the very specific editing style it has, i dont know why some people think its supposed to be serious when it adopts such a specific presentation style. But yeah he has been making a lot more unsubtle jokes recently
[QUOTE=t h e;52659677]It's not some excuse to pardon bad quality, the channel's just literally never been that serious, it's pretty evident in the very specific editing style it has, i dont know why some people think its supposed to be serious when it adopts such a specific presentation style.[/QUOTE]
tbh watch a single video of everything wrong with cinemasins and come back. or keep watching, because those are actually enjoyable works on how to not make content
the inconsistencies CS points out are nearly always things that are explained either through dialog or what's literally right onscreen. oftentimes he takes stiff out of context and presents them as faults to the writing and structure of the movie. despite the "nonserious" attitude his serious work has said the same things and almost exactly the same way.
its bullshit because he frames all of these things in movies in a bad light and with charged language, "sins", but he winds up missing everything actually critiqueable while favoring zingers that don't work when you think for two seconds. it brings down the level of discourse and makes people think perfectly fine films have these glaring flaws that they actually don't.
[QUOTE=t h e;52659677]I always thought CinemaSins entire jist was pointing out small details and oversights that don't actually make a difference to the movie's quality at all (or pointing out plotholes/odd reasoning behind actions). I think he's been memeing it up recently but I haven't looked at his recent videos, but they're not meant to be serious in the slightest. It's not some excuse to pardon bad quality, the channel's just literally never been that serious, it's pretty evident in the very specific editing style it has, i dont know why some people think its supposed to be serious when it adopts such a specific presentation style. But yeah he has been making a lot more unsubtle jokes recently[/QUOTE]
As pointed out earlier, it's disingenuous to say "it's never been serious". Watch the Django Unchained video posted above, and virtually all of the points he makes are legitimate continuity errors and plot holes, with only one or two joke dings.
Also note the length of the video.
You can trace out when CinemaSins started going down the shitter by the length of the videos. As they get longer and longer, they get worse and worse.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.