Die Hard 5 - General - Facepunch Forum

[IMG]http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Film/Pix/pictures/2007/06/04/diehard982734.jpg[/IMG] The script is apparently completed, shooting commences at the beginning of 2011. Hopefully, or "luckily" released at the end of 2011 or beginning of 2012. I'm happy. [editline]14th October 2010[/editline] Here is some sauce. [URL]http://www.imdb.com/news/ni1050835/[/URL] Oops, that one seems to have gone off. [URL]http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1649232/20101004/story.jhtml[/URL] EDIT: could someone clarify what the disagrees are about?

I was hoping Live Free or Die Hard would be the last...

The first one will remain my favourite. The others weren't bad but Die Hard setting and villain was the best in my opinion. Hopefully Bruce will have energy for this.

If Bruce Willis is in this its going to suck , he's like 40

Jackie Chan is 50, but he can still act and do stunts. I believe Jet Lee is getting up there as well. He played his character very well in The Expendables.

Die Hard 4 was a good movie to be honest. He was 51 when he made that movie. I'm sure him being 55 won't let him NOT be John McClain :v: [editline]14th October 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=The_Marine;25402306]I was hoping Live Free or Die Hard would be the last...[/QUOTE] He plans on making a sixth Die Hard then ending the franchise. Why do people hate the idea that "oldness" means bad? What was wrong with Die Hard 4?

They really need to stop. The first was the best, the third was really good, but Live Free or Die Hard was awful. They need to let it go before they ruin the series.

Don't know why loads of people didn't like Die Hard 4, it was perfectly good. Hope this one's better, though.

As long as it's not a PG or something ridiculous like the last one.

[QUOTE=JesusKitty;25402400]They really need to stop. The first was the best, the third was really good, but Live Free or Die Hard was awful. They need to let it go before they ruin the series.[/QUOTE] Die Hard 2 was great too :3: [editline]14th October 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=FoxMeister;25402412]As long as it's not a PG or something ridiculous like the last one.[/QUOTE] They released an uncensored version with a lot more of the gore and swearing that was edited out in the first cinema release version.

[QUOTE=Akayz;25402413]Die Hard 2 was great too :3: [editline]14th October 2010[/editline] They released an uncensored version with a lot more of the gore and swearing that was edited out in the first cinema release version.[/QUOTE]Yeah, I liked 2 also. But 1 and 3 were even better! I think I saw that version and liked it better.

[QUOTE=Generic.Monk;25402403]Don't know why loads of people didn't like Die Hard 4, it was perfectly good. Hope this one's better, though.[/QUOTE] It was good, but the technobabble was unbearable. it made some sense for the first few acts. Then went to utter shit in the last few. Why the fuck am I watching Die Hard for a realistic view of hacking?

[QUOTE=JesusKitty;25402445]Yeah, I liked 2 also. But 1 and 3 were even better! I think I saw that version and liked it better.[/QUOTE] 3 was definitely brilliant. But I personally don't think it would have been without Samuel L Jackson and Jeremy Irons.

[QUOTE=hexpunK;25402470]It was good, but the technobabble was unbearable. it made some sense for the first few acts. Then went to utter shit in the last few. Why the fuck am I watching Die Hard for a realistic view of hacking?[/QUOTE] [img]http://art.penny-arcade.com/photos/217521921_7GXmh-L-2.jpg[/img]

It was alright, although DH1 is my fav.

[QUOTE=Satansick;25402333]If Bruce Willis is in this its going to suck , he's like 40[/QUOTE] clint eastwood is like 326 and he was great in gran torino shut up

Die Hard 4 was the best one since the original in my opinion. So if this happens I am going to jizz in my pants. Really though, I can't wait for this.

I love stupid action films. Always so actiony and full of cool explosions and crap. Yes when it comes to films I have quite simple taste, however avatar was a piece of shit.

As long as it's better than Die Hard 2. That shit was bad.

1>3>4>>>2 in my opinion. 4 was great, so I'm happy that they are making a 5th.

But whose ass will Bruce Willis kick once he's exhausted the ass supplies? Die Hard 6 will have to take place in space.

When die hard 6 comes out an Bruce is about 60 they shouldn`t put tons of make up and such on him. I think having a bad-ass 60 year old bearded guy driving cars into helicopters is pretty cool for once.

[QUOTE=fenwick;25403628]As long as it's better than Die Hard 2. That shit was bad.[/QUOTE] Oi. Hating on Die Hard 2 will get you nowhere :saddowns: I love all the Die Hard movies for what they are.

I loved all the die hards. I have to admit though, 4 was kind of...out there. But hey, they were going for an "old school hero meets today's cyber terrorist" type of feeling.

[QUOTE=Satansick;25402333]If Bruce Willis isn't in this its going to suck[/QUOTE] Fixed that for you.

Die hard 84: Rise of the pensioners john, he took her medication! Yippie-kayay, motherfuckers

[QUOTE=mysteryman;25403973]I loved all the die hards. I have to admit though, 4 was kind of...out there. But hey, they were going for an "old school hero meets today's cyber terrorist" type of feeling.[/QUOTE] The plane part was awful. They could have definitely done without that part. But the rest of it I thought had the same spirit as the original, even though it wasn't just McClane vs. Hans it kicked ass.

Let it die.

[QUOTE=mysteryman;25403973]But hey, they were going for an "old school hero meets today's cyber terrorist" type of feeling.[/QUOTE]Which is a stupid idea and doesn't make for a good movie. Especially one that had so much potential.

[QUOTE=Doc Diddles;25404167]Let it die.[/QUOTE] Let Terminator and Indiana Jones die. Die Hard, will not die............... hard.