[quote]
A man found naked at a casino claimed he was a Terminator sent from the future.
19-year-old Sean Stanley Smith was arrested on the Nevada border after he was spotted by a motorist wandering around the highway nude. He was ordered by police to stop but proceeded into a nearby casino - where he was then tasered in front of a group of children.
Smith claims he was a Terminator sent back in time from the future - a reference to the film character made popular by Arnold Schwarznegger in the sci-fi franchise. The films usually start with a naked man being transported to the past.
However, it turned out that Smith was not a time-travelling Terminator but was in fact suffering from the effects of LSD and marijuana. He was charged with indecent exposure and resisting a police officer.[/quote]
Source: [URL]http://uk.movies.yahoo.com/13072009/5/naked-man-casino-terminator-0.html[/URL]
What a shocking experience. :smug:
Because being a terminator will endear you to the police, rather than make them terminate you.
He wasn't charged with possession?
Lucky day for that dude.
uh oh
Oh fuck what have the police done? They need to set him free so John Connor can survive!
[QUOTE=laurencedgreat;20174230]Oh fuck what have the police done? They need to set him free so John Connor can survive![/QUOTE]
John Connor was a prick anyway.
i bet people in the casino were like "he be back"
Think I seen something similiar like this before. :P
I bet the Casino Owners were like Hasta La Vista Baby!
[QUOTE=MachiniOs;20174288]John Connor was a prick anyway.[/QUOTE]
He broke into the vet and stole drugs after hitting a deer on his motorcycle.
He was a fucking badass.
But he also was a douchebag back in the early 90's :\
what happens if this is real?
[QUOTE=Lankist;20174123]He wasn't charged with possession?
Lucky day for that dude.[/QUOTE]
He can only be charged with possession if he has drugs on him. I'm guessing he had them in his bloodstream but not in his pockets or anything.
[QUOTE=Mudbone;20174665]what happens if this is real?[/QUOTE]
We're fucked :byodood:
[QUOTE=Veribigbos;20174689]He can only be charged with possession if he has drugs on him. I'm guessing he had them in his bloodstream but not in his pockets or anything.[/QUOTE]
Lankist is a lawyer, and he didn't even think of that.
:smug:
[QUOTE=MachiniOs;20174288]John Connor was a prick anyway.[/QUOTE]
Let Sarah Connor live then?
[QUOTE=Mudbone;20174665]what happens if this is real?[/QUOTE]
Skynet would be a bunch of idiots to make a tasererable Terminator. It isn't their style.
:v:
[QUOTE=Veribigbos;20174689]He can only be charged with possession if he has drugs on him. I'm guessing he had them in his bloodstream but not in his pockets or anything.[/QUOTE]
Being provably under the influence of illicit substances is enough for a warrant for search and seizure, and enough to charge them with possession before the evidence is recovered for a trial. Should no evidence be found the charges would be dropped.
It can go the other way, they can plant a charge after they search but they wouldn't have arrested him for that and they couldn't keep him held for that until the evidence is recovered.
This means a criminal could be released on lower bail with opportunity to go destroy the evidence before the police could find it, therefore if they intend to charge him with possession, distribution or any other drug charge they would likely want to do it with the established evidence that is intoxication before allotting him the time to go destroy it.
[editline]01:57PM[/editline]
When I said it was his lucky day I said that because his bail would have been inordinately higher had they thrown everything they had at him from the get-go, rather than simple indecency and resistance.
You guys must think the police are incredibly inefficient if you think they can't pin drug charges on someone until they make a huge bust.
[QUOTE=windwakr;20175097]How is it lucky? He was nude in front of children. They're probably going to register him as a sex offender or something.[/QUOTE]
True, but he's probably not going to be pegged as a sex offender as much as he is an addled idiot.
There's a bit of a double-standard in prosecution between indecent exposure in men and indecent exposure in women.
Am I the only one that wonders why children were in a casino ?
[QUOTE=TheTalon;20175742]Am I the only one that wonders why children were in a casino ?[/QUOTE]
The casinos on the nevada border have all sorts of rollercoasters and shit, my dad used to take me there all the time when I was little.
[QUOTE=Lankist;20174123]He wasn't charged with possession?
Lucky day for that dude.[/QUOTE]
He'd already smoked his shit man.
Nothing to 'possess.' :v:
lol 'suffering from the effects'. that sounds like it was fun
Terminator.
[img]http://www.vancouversun.com/sports/2010wintergames/2555654.bin?size=620x400[/img]
[editline]03:31PM[/editline]
Also, lol at: [quote]where he was then tasered in front of a group of children[/quote]
[QUOTE=Bourne;20174617]i bet people in the casino were like "he be back"[/QUOTE]
Racist.
Must have been some good acid.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.