Oh come on. So if Apple rips people off it's okay, but not vice-versa.
[editline]7th April 2011[/editline]
It's even worse considering what Apple tries to patent/trademark, *cough*APP STORE*cough*..
[QUOTE=Armyis1337;29031281]Oh come on. So if Apple rips people off it's okay, but not vice-versa.
[editline]7th April 2011[/editline]
It's even worse considering what Apple tries to patent/trademark, *cough*APP STORE*cough*..[/QUOTE]
The bigger you are the more you get away with.
[QUOTE=Elstumpo;29031401]The bigger you are the more you get away with.[/QUOTE]
I'm half expecting some kind of gabe newell/episode 3 joke
[QUOTE=Keggs;29031428]I'm half expecting some kind of gabe newell/episode 3 joke[/QUOTE]
There is nothing funny about Gabe's weight.
:v:
Beck: Sex Change
Great image BBC
What happened here is that they failed to provide evidence that Apple ripped them off. Kind of a dumb move to take someone, specially someone as big as Apple, to court without solid evidence.
Awww poor little Apple
You bully Mirror Worlds!
GTFO, Apple.
[QUOTE=LuckOrLoss;29031680]Beck: Sex Change
Great image BBC[/QUOTE]
it says Sea Change
Didn't the beatles start the original apple company and these guys ripped them off?
:colbert:
[quote][b]small[/b] technology firm Mirror Worlds.[/quote]
vs [quote]apple[/quote]
i'm sadly not Surprised by the verdict
:smith:
wow what a sensational headline
look what's right under it
A judge has thrown out a ruling that would have forced Apple to pay $625m (£383m) for alleged patent infringements.
[quote][B]Reviewing the case, Judge Davis upheld Mirror Worlds' patents, [/B][/quote]
Doesn't that technically mean Mirror Worlds should've won? :colbert:
I [I]really[/I] hate my country sometimes.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
