Nikki Haley suggests President Trump tweeted about classified info - Polidicks

[QUOTE] [URL="http://abcnews.go.com/topics/news/world/united-nations.htm"]United Nations[/URL] Ambassador [URL="http://abcnews.go.com/topics/news/us/nikki-haley.htm"]Nikki Haley[/URL] refused to comment this morning on a report about North Korea, saying, "I can't talk about anything that's classified." One person who didn't mind sharing the information? President [URL="http://abcnews.go.com/topics/news/donald-trump.htm"]Donald Trump[/URL]. The report in question was published on Fox News' website this morning. According to the story, U.S. spy satellites detected North Korean forces moving anti-ship cruise missiles. At 6:41 a.m. ET, Trump retweeted a post from Fox about the report, which it said was based on anonymous "U.S. officials with knowledge of the latest intelligence in the region." He [URL="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/tracing-president-trump-news/story?id=45964029"]regularly retweets[/URL] Fox News stories on his personal Twitter account. Haley was a guest on "Fox and Friends" this morning. After Trump retweeted the report, she was asked about the information included in the article. "I can't talk about anything that's classified. And if that's in the newspaper, that's a shame," Haley said. "I have no reason to comment on it," she added. When asked if it was "another leak," which the Trump administration has railed against, Haley said, "It's one of those things I don't know what's going on." "But I will tell you it's incredibly dangerous when things get out into the press like that. You're not only just getting a scoop on something. You're playing with people's lives. And this has got to stop. Whatever the leaks are coming from, if somebody thinks they are getting power or fame from it, all you are doing is putting Americans in danger," she said. [/QUOTE] [URL]http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/nikki-haley-suggests-president-trump-tweeted-classified-info/story?id=49093129[/URL] Not only possibly classified information, but also an article that relies on anonymous sources, which I guess are okay now.

"Anonymous sources are unreliable, except if its our side then its O.K."

i wonder what happens if a Trump tweet can be directly linked to hundreds of deaths like not that this could be that bad, this is just some dumb unrelated hypothetical, but god, that'd be fucking wild

There's more information leaking from the white house than it feels should be... possible. Like, if a country wanted to spy on us it doesn't seem like it would take a very competent spy.

[QUOTE=MedicWine;52553601]There's more information leaking from the white house than it feels should be... possible. Like, if a country wanted to spy on us it doesn't seem like it would take a very competent spy.[/QUOTE] Too late. They helped elect the least competent spy.

oh nikki, you're always ten minutes late to the trump party and standing on the wrong side of the room. Not that dysfunction should be so casually ignored but I distinctly get the impression her and trump have not met or spoke since he nominated her because she always is completely the opposite of the administration which is not how its supposed to work, the UN ambassador should be the extension of the administration to the world

Dumb bitches first thought is to go after the news when it's her fucking boss and our President divulging the news on twitter. We, are, fucked.